[1]
‘European intellectual property review’.
[2]
Institute of Information Scientists and Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (Great Britain), ‘Journal of information science’.
[3]
Aslib, ‘Aslib proceedings’.
[4]
American Society for Information Science, ‘Journal of the American Society for Information Science’, 2000.
[5]
‘LawboreTM Directory’.
[7]
‘Welcome to Lawlinks - Lawlinks - University of Kent’.
[9]
D. I. Bainbridge and D. I. Bainbridge, Introduction to information technology law, 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2008.
[10]
Pedley, Paul, Essential law for information professionals, 3rd ed. London: Facet, 2011.
[11]
I. J. Lloyd, Information technology law, Seventh edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[12]
Staying Legal. Facet Publishing.
[13]
Shapiro, Carl and Varian, Hal R., Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School, 1999.
[14]
Eisenschitz, Tamara S., Information transfer policy: issues of control and access. Library Association, 1993.
[15]
Akdeniz, Yaman, Walker, Clive, and Wall, David, The Internet, law and society. Harlow: Pearson, 2000.
[16]
Edwards, Lilian. Edwards, Law and the Internet, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Hart, 2009.
[17]
L. Bently and B. Sherman, Intellectual property law, Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[18]
Stamatoudi, Irini A., Copyright and multimedia products: a comparative analysis, vol. Cambridge studies in intellectual property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[19]
Litman, Jessica, Digital copyright: protecting intellectual property on the Internet. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2001.
[20]:
:: ‘the future of ideas ’:
[21]
Thierer, Adam D., Crews, Wayne, and Cato Institute, Copy fights: the future of intellectual property in the information age. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2002.
[22]
Cho, George, Geographic information systems and the law: mapping the legal frontiers. Chichester, England: J. Wiley & Sons, 1998.
[23]
Jones, Hugh and Benson, Christopher, Publishing law, 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2011.
[24]
Crone, Tom, Alberstat, Philip, Crone, Tom, Cassels, Tom, and Over, Estelle, Law and the media, 4th ed. Oxford: Focal, 2002.
[25]
Bott, Frank, Professional issues in information technology. Swindon: British Computer Society, 2005.
[26]
Pedley, Paul, Essential law for information professionals, 3rd ed. London: Facet, 2011.
[27]
Cho, George, Geographic information systems and the law: mapping the legal frontiers. Chichester, England: J. Wiley & Sons, 1998.
[28]
Jones, Hugh and Benson, Christopher, Publishing law, 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2011.
[29]
G. L. Williams, Glanville Williams : learning the law, Sixteenth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2016.
[30]
Atiyah, P. S., Law and modern society, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 1995.
[31]
Butterworths Expert Guide to the European Union. Lexis Law Publishing (Va).
[32]
Holborn, Guy, Butterworths legal research guide, 2nd ed. London: Butterworths, 2001.
[33]
‘Legislation Series - UK Parliament’.
[34]
‘Procedure Series - UK Parliament’.
[35]
‘Bills before Parliament 2012-13 — UK Parliament’.
[37]
‘The 1709 Blog - powered by FeedBurner’.
[38]
‘The IPKat - powered by FeedBurner’.
[40]
‘Mondaq.Com - feed of articles on Intellectual Property’.
[41]
‘Out-Law News :: Copyright’.
[42]
‘Out-Law News :: Data protection’.
[43]
‘UK Freedom of Information Blog’.
[44]
‘Out-Law News :: Freedom of information’.
[45]
‘Advisory Panel on Public Sector Information | The National Archives’.
[46]
‘EDRI | Digital Civil Rights in Europe’.
[47]
‘OECD.org - Internet economy’.
[49]
‘Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law - powered by FeedBurner’.
[53]
D. I. Bainbridge and D. I. Bainbridge, Introduction to information technology law, 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2008.
[54]
‘Treaties and Contracting Parties: WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT)’.
[55]
‘WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization’.
[56]
‘Intellectual Property Office - Welcome to the Intellectual Property Office’.
[57]
‘Geneva declaration for the future of WIPO 2004 - IP Justice’.
[58]
‘Gowers review on IPRs in the UK HM Treasury, 2006’.
[59]
‘Hargreaves report. Digital opportunity: a review of intellectual property and growth.’
[60]
Pedley, Paul, Essential law for information professionals, 3rd ed. London: Facet, 2011.
[61]
Bainbridge, David I. and Bainbridge, David I., Introduction to information technology law, 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2008.
[62]
Tania S.L. Cheng, ‘Does copyright law confer a monopoly over unpreserved cows?’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2006.
[63]
Mark J. Davison, ‘Football fixtures, horseraces and spin offs: the ECJ domesticates the database right’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2005.
[64]
T. Eisenschitz, ‘Moral rights and information content in published works’, Aslib Proceedings, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 316–329, 2006, doi: 10.1108/00012530610687696
[65]
T. Eisenschitz, ‘Non-literal copying of factual information: architecture of knowledge’, Aslib Proceedings, vol. 59, no. 4/5, pp. 411–421, 2007, doi: 10.1108/00012530710817609
[66]
David Gee, ‘Should librarians and information professionals be content with current UK copyright law?’, Legal Information Management, 2008.
[67]
Thomas Heide, ‘The Berne three-step test and the proposed Copyright Directive’, European Intellectual Property ReviewEditorial, 1999.
[68]
Anthony Mason, ‘Developments in the law of copyright and public access to information’, European Intellectual Property Review, 1997.
[69]
Timothy Pinto, ‘The influence of the European Convention on Human Rights on intellectual property rights’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2002.
[70]
Pamela Samuelson, ‘Challenges for the World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Trade-Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Council in regulating intellectual property rights in the information age’, European Intellectual Property Review, 1999.
[71]
‘’Online infringement of copyright (initial obligations) cost sharing: HM Government response’.
[72]
‘Ofcom | Online Infringement of Copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010’.
[73]
‘Consultation on legislative options to address illicit peer to peer (P2) file-sharing - Government response’.
[74]
‘Consultation on legislation to address illicit peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing. Department for Business Innovation and Skills, 16th June 2009’.
[75]
‘Judicial review of the Digital Economy Act 2010’.
[77]
‘The Government Response to the Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth’.
[78]
‘CONSULTATION ON COPYRIGHT’.
[79]
‘(Hargreaves review) supporting document T: text mining and data analytics in call for evidence responses’.
[80]
‘Impact assessment – exception for copying of works for use by text and data analytics.’
[81]
‘UK Publishers Moan About Content Mining’s Possible Problems; Dismiss Other Countries’ Actual Experience | Techdirt’.
[82]
‘Content mining copyright exemption would harm UK business, publishers claim’.
[83]
‘Content Mining Free For All Would Be Bad For All’.
[84]
‘SRoC: Slightly Right of Centre: Copyright law and data analytics (data mining) discussed in depth at PICTFOR’.
[85]
‘Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law: Hargreaves & “text mining” - digging up copyright?’
[86]
‘The Publishers Association says Hargreaves data mining proposals are an "unwarranted blunt instrument”’.
[87]
‘Journal article mining: a research study into practices, policies, plans and promises. Publishing Research Consortium, May 2011.’
[88]
‘Text Mining : JISC’.
[89]
D. I. Bainbridge and D. I. Bainbridge, Introduction to information technology law, 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2008.
[90]
(INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW) BY LLOYD, IAN J.[ AUTHOR ]Paperback 06-2011 [Paperback]. Oxford University Press (2 Jun 2011).
[91]
Jeffrey Belson, ‘Brand protection in the age of the Internet’, European Intellectual Property ReviewEditorial, 1999.
[92]
McBain, Mark and City University, ‘Appropriation of domain names & domain name blocking: implications of trademarks and internet governance on the domain name system’, City University, 2006.
[93]
‘WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization’.
[94]
‘Intellectual Property Office - Welcome to the Intellectual Property Office’.
[95]
D. I. Bainbridge and D. I. Bainbridge, Introduction to information technology law, 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2008.
[96]
Pedley, Paul, Essential law for information professionals, 3rd ed. London: Facet, 2011.
[97]
‘Council of Europe - ETS No. 185 - Convention on Cybercrime’.
[98]
‘EUR-Lex - 32005F0222 - EN’.
[99]
‘EUROPA - Press Releases - Commission to boost Europe’s defences against cyber-attacks’.
[100]
‘The cost of cyber crime | Cabinet Office’.
[101]
‘Deloitte | Cyber Crime: A Clear and Present Danger’.
[102]
‘ACPO manager’s guide: good practice and advice for managers of e-crime investigations.’
[103]
D. Vadgama and City University, ‘Is current UK legislation adequate to deal with the ever changing techniques of cybercrime? Is there a need to have a “super law” designed to curb cybercrime incidents and allow for effective prosecution of cybercriminals?’, City University.
[104]
‘Protecting and promoting the UK in a digital world | Cabinet Office’.
[105]
Pedley, Paul, Essential law for information professionals, 3rd ed. London: Facet, 2011.
[106]
Kelvin Smith, Freedom Of Information. Library Assn Pub Ltd.
[107]
A. Stead, Information rights in practice: the non-legal professional’s guide. London: Facet, 2008.
[108]
Brooke, Heather, Your right to know: a citizen’s guide to the Freedom of Information Act, 2nd ed. London: Pluto, 2007.
[109]
‘Data Protection and Freedom of Information advice - ICO’.
[110]
‘Freedom of Information Act 2000’.
[111]
‘[ARCHIVED CONTENT] IAR and inforoute’.
[112]
Cowley, Jonathan and City University, ‘The impact of the freedom of information act on UK higher education institutions: a comparative study examing similar legislation in Ireland, Canada and Australia’, City University, 2004.
[113]
Cordell, Grace and City University, ‘Open government?: preparation and culture in local government approaching implementation of the freedom of information act 2000’, City University, 2004.
[114]
A. Withers and City University, ‘How User Friendly are the FoI Systems in England and Scotland?’, City University, 2008.
[115]
Pedley, Paul, Essential law for information professionals, 3rd ed. London: Facet, 2011.
[116]
‘Human Rights Act 1998’.
[118]
‘LawboreTM Directory’.
[119]
R. Gordon and T. Ward, ‘Human Rights Act in Practice’, The Solicitors’ journal, pp. 204–205, 5 AD.
[120]
Roger Smith, ‘Human Rights and the UK Constitution: can Parliament legislate “irrespective of the Human Rights Act”?’, Legal Information Management, 2006.
[121]
‘How fair is Britain? Equality, Human Rights and Good Relations in 2010; The First Triennial Review’.
[122]
‘United Kingdom: Time for an inquiry into the UK’s role in human rights violations overseas since 11 September 2001 | Amnesty International’.
[123]
‘Joint Committee Reports - Human Rights’.
[124]
J. Norman and P. Oborne, ‘Churchill’s legacy: the conservative case for the Human Rights Act’.
[125]
‘Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust Ltd | Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust’.
[126]
‘Information Economy Report (Series)’.
[127]
‘Digital economy rankings 2010: beyond e-readiness’.
[128]
‘Eurostat. E-commerce (includes RFID) Eurostat news release 12/2010, 19 January 2010’.
[129]
L. Waverman and K. Dasgupta, ‘Connectivity scorecard 2009’.
[130]
European Commission, ‘Europe’s digital competitiveness report 2010’.
[131]
‘The Digital Economy Fact Book’.
[132]
‘United Nations E-Government Development Knowledge Base’.
[133]
‘Electronic Voting- A challenge to democracy?’
[134]
‘May 2007 pilot scheme - Electoral Commission’.
[135]
‘May 2007 Election Report | Open Rights Group’.
[136]
‘The European e-government action plan 2011-2015: harnessing ICT to promote smart, sustainable & innovative government’.
[137]
‘Breaking Barriers to e-Government: Home’.
[138]
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, ‘E-democracy; Postnote- January 2009’.
[139]
‘Ofcom | The Communications Market 2010 (August)’.
[140]
‘Government launches National Infrastructure Plan - HM Treasury’.
[141]
‘e-Government - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia’.
[142]
‘E-democracy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia’.
[143]
‘Network neutrality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia’.
[144]
‘UNESCO. National information society policy: a template’.
[145]
‘Public Sector Information Economic Indicators & Economic case study on charging models’.
[146]
‘The commercial use of public information (December 2006) - The Office of Fair Trading’.
[147]
‘The United Kingdom report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information 2009.’
[148]
‘Policy options for geographic information from Ordnance Survey: Consultation - Government Response - Corporate - Department for Communities and Local Government’.
[149]
‘World Government Data | guardian.co.uk’.
[150]
‘Annex 2 – Public Data Principles | data.gov.uk’.
[151]
‘UK Government Licensing Framework | The National Archives’.
[152]
‘Open Government Licence’.
[153]
‘Data Protection: 16 Sep 2010: Hansard Written Answers and Statements - TheyWorkForYou’. Available: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2010-09-16a.15690.h&s=%22data protection%22
[154]
‘EUR-Lex - 32003L0098 - EN’.
[155]
‘The Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2005’.
[156]
‘Public Data Corporation to free up public data and drive innovation | Cabinet Office’.
[157]
‘The Role of the Information Asset Owner: a Practical Guide’.
[158]
‘Information management | The National Archives’.
[159]
N. Korn and C. Oppenheim, ‘Licensing Open Data: A Practical Guide’.
[160]
‘Workshop on using copyright to promote access to information and creative content.’
[161]
‘Making Open Data Real: A Public Consultation | Cabinet Office’.
[162]
‘Consultation on Data Policy for a Public Data Corporation | Cabinet Office’.
[163]
J. Houghton, ‘Costs and Benefits of Data Provision’.
[164]
‘OFT probes alleged rogue resellers of government data; Information World Review September/October’.
[165]
‘The Information Daily.com - Criminals Using Transparency Agenda To Defraud Councils Of Millions Of Taxpayers’ Money Says Audit Commission’.
[166]
S.-L. Pang and City University, ‘Freeing public data: is the UK moving towards the wisdom age?’, City University.
[167]
Pedley, Paul, Essential law for information professionals, 3rd ed. London: Facet, 2011.
[168]
T. Eisenschitz, ‘Internet law and information policy’, Aslib Proceedings, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 267–273, 1998, doi: 10.1108/eb051505
[169]
T. Eisenschitz, ‘E-mail law’, Aslib Proceedings, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2002, doi: 10.1108/00012530210426275
[170]
G. Watson, ‘E-mail surveillance in the UK workplace – a management consulting case study’, Aslib Proceedings, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 23–40, 2002, doi: 10.1108/00012530210426266
[171]
L. Cooke, ‘Regulating the Internet: Policy and Practice With Reference to the Control of Internet Access and Content (Louise Cooke) - Academia.edu’.
[172]
M. Jones and City University, ‘Policing the misuse of the Internet and email in the workplace’, City University, 2006.
[173]
M. Crichard, ‘E-MAIL MONITORING- I: EAVESDROPPING AT WORK — IS IT LEGAL?’, The computer law and security report, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 120–121, 2001.
[174]
Anandarajan, Murugan, ‘INTERNET ABUSE IN THE WORKPLACE.’, Communications of the ACM, vol. 45 Issue 1, p53-54, 2p, no. 45 Issue 1, p53-54, 2p, Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1089299&db=bsu&AN=11934583
[175]
‘JANET acceptable use policy’.
[176]
‘the Web2.0 Rights project.’
