[1]
Aguilera, A. et al. 2016. Home-based telework in France: Characteristics, barriers and perspectives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 92, (Oct. 2016), 1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.021.
[2]
Arnold, J. and Randall, R. 2016. Work psychology: understanding human behaviour in the workplace. Pearson.
[3]
Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. 1989. Social Identity Theory and the Organization. The Academy of Management Review. 14, 1 (Jan. 1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/258189.
[4]
Avolio, B.J. et al. 2009. Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions. Annual Review of Psychology. 60, 1 (Jan. 2009), 421–449. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621.
[5]
Buchanan, D.A. and Huczynski, A. 2017. Organizational behaviour. Pearson.
[6]
Drath, W.H. et al. 2008. Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 19, 6 (Dec. 2008), 635–653. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.003.
[7]
Ellemers, N. et al. 2004. Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance. The Academy of Management Review. 29, 3 (Jul. 2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/20159054.
[8]
Gajendran, R.S. and Harrison, D.A. 2007. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology. 92, 6 (2007), 1524–1541. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.
[9]
Haslam, S.A. 2004. Psychology in organizations: the social identity approach. SAGE.
[10]
Ibarra, Herminia 2015. The Authenticity Paradox. Harvard Business Review. 93, Issue 1/2, p52-59. 8p. 2 Color Photographs (2015), 52–59.
[11]
Peters, K. et al. 2015. Marines, medics, and machismo: Lack of fit with masculine occupational stereotypes discourages men’s participation. British Journal of Psychology. 106, 4 (Nov. 2015), 635–655. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12106.
[12]
Steffens, N.K. et al. 2015. ‘Of the group’ and ‘for the group’: How followership is shaped by leaders’ prototypicality and group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology. 45, 2 (Mar. 2015), 180–190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2088.
