[1]
J. Arnold and R. Randall, Work psychology: understanding human behaviour in the workplace, Sixth edition. Harlow, England: Pearson, 2016.
[2]
B. J. Avolio, F. O. Walumbwa, and T. J. Weber, ‘Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 421–449, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621.
[3]
W. H. Drath, C. D. McCauley, C. J. Palus, E. Van Velsor, P. M. G. O’Connor, and J. B. McGuire, ‘Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership’, The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 635–653, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.003.
[4]
Ibarra, Herminia, ‘The Authenticity Paradox.’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 93, no. Issue 1/2, p52-59. 8p. 2 Color Photographs, pp. 52–59, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1089299&db=bth&AN=100020763
[5]
D. A. Buchanan and A. Huczynski, Organizational behaviour, Ninth edition. Harlow, England: Pearson, 2017.
[6]
S. A. Haslam, Psychology in organizations: the social identity approach, 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://0-sk.sagepub.com.wam.city.ac.uk/books/psychology-in-organizations
[7]
N. Ellemers, D. De Gilder, and S. A. Haslam, ‘Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 29, no. 3, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.2307/20159054.
[8]
B. E. Ashforth and F. Mael, ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 1989, doi: 10.2307/258189.
[9]
N. K. Steffens, S. C. Schuh, S. A. Haslam, A. Pérez, and R. van Dick, ‘“Of the group” and “for the group”: How followership is shaped by leaders’ prototypicality and group identification’, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 180–190, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2088.
[10]
K. Peters, M. K. Ryan, and S. A. Haslam, ‘Marines, medics, and machismo: Lack of fit with masculine occupational stereotypes discourages men’s participation’, British Journal of Psychology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 635–655, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1111/bjop.12106.
[11]
A. Aguilera, V. Lethiais, A. Rallet, and L. Proulhac, ‘Home-based telework in France: Characteristics, barriers and perspectives’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 92, pp. 1–11, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.021.
[12]
R. S. Gajendran and D. A. Harrison, ‘The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences.’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1524–1541, 2007, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.
