[1]
Ashworth, Andrew and Redmayne, Mike 2010. The criminal process. Oxford University Press.
[2]
Ashworth, Andrew and Redmayne, Mike 2010. The criminal process. Oxford University Press.
[3]
Ashworth, Andrew and Redmayne, Mike 2010. The criminal process. Oxford University Press.
[4]
Ashworth, Andrew and Redmayne, Mike 2010. The criminal process. Oxford University Press.
[5]
Attorney Generals Guidelines on Disclosure: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service: http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/attorney_generals_guidelines_on_disclosure/.
[6]
Ball, C. Youth justice? Half a century of responses to youth offending [2004] Crim. L.R. 167. Criminal Law Review.
[7]
Bar Standards Board: Guidance on preparation of defence statements: https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/.
[8]
Barsby, C. and Ormerod, D.C. Special advocates: Human Rights Act 1998 Sch. 1, Pt 1, Art. 6 [2004] Crim LR 861. Criminal Law Review.
[9]
Boon, A. and Nash, S. Special advocacy: political expediency and legal roles in modern judicial systems [2006] 9(1) Legal Ethics 101. Legal Ethics.
[10]
Choo, Andrew L. - T. 2008. Abuse of process and judicial stays of criminal pleadings / Andrew L. - T. Choo.
[11]
Choo, Andrew L.-T. and Oxford Scholarship Online Law 2008. Abuse of process and judicial stays of criminal proceedings. Oxford University Press.
[12]
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing by Peter Hungerford-Welch - Updates on companion website to book: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415442923/updates.asp.
[13]
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing by Peter Hungerford-Welch - Updates on companion website to book: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415442923/updates.asp.
[14]
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing by Peter Hungerford-Welch - Updates on companion website to book: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415442923/updates.asp.
[15]
Criminal Procedure Rules: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal.
[16]
Crown Prosecution Service v P [2007] EWHC 946 (Admin) (27 April 2007): http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2007/946.html.
[17]
Disclosure Manual: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service: http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/disclosure_manual/.
[18]
Elliott, C. Criminal responsibility and children: a new defence required to acknowledge the absence of capacity and choice (2011) 75 JCL 289. Journal of Criminal Law.
[19]
Great Britain 2001. Double jeopardy and prosecution appeals: report on two references under section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 : presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor...March 2001. HMSO.
[20]
Great Britain 1993. The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice: report: Cm 2263.
[21]
High Court’s Jurisdiction in Relation to Criminal Proceedings - Law Commission: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/high-courts-jurisdiction.htm.
[22]
Hofmeyr, K. The problem of private entrapment [2006] Crim. L.R., Apr, 319. Criminal Law Review.
[23]
Hoyano, L. R v A: perverting the course of justice [2013] Crim. L.R., 3, 240. Criminal Law Review.
[24]
Hucklesby, A. Not necessarily a trip to the police station: the introduction of street bail [2004] Crim LR 803. Criminal Law Review.
[25]
Hungerford-Welch, P. Abuse of process: R v F - delayed complaint of sexual abuse [2012] Crim. L.R., 4, 282. Criminal Law Review.
[26]
Hungerford-Welch, P. Prosecution interviews of defence witnesses [2010] Crim LR 690. Criminal Law Review.
[27]
Hungerford-Welch, P. R v Austin: abuse of process - disclosure - non-disclosure in previous proceedings which had been discontinued [2013] Crim. L.R., 11, 914. Criminal Law Review.
[28]
Hungerford-Welch, P. R v Barkshire (David Robert): evidence - non-disclosure - evidence of police officer’s activity undermining prosecution case not disclosed to defence [2012] Crim. L.R., 6, 453. Criminal Law Review.
[29]
Hungerford-Welch, Peter 2009. Criminal procedure and sentencing. Routledge-Cavendish.
[30]
Hungerford-Welch, Peter 2009. Criminal procedure and sentencing. Routledge-Cavendish.
[31]
Hungerford-Welch, Peter and Hungerford-Welch, Peter 2009. Criminal procedure and sentencing. Routledge-Cavendish.
[32]
Hungerford-Welch, Peter and Hungerford-Welch, Peter 2009. Criminal procedure and sentencing. Routledge-Cavendish.
[33]
Hungerford-Welch, Peter and Hungerford-Welch, Peter 2009. *Criminal procedure and sentencing. Routledge-Cavendish.
[34]
Hungerford-Welch, Peter and Hungerford-Welch, Peter 2009. Criminal procedure and sentencing. Routledge-Cavendish.
[35]
Hungerford-Welch, Peter and Hungerford-Welch, Peter 2009. Criminal procedure and sentencing. Routledge-Cavendish.
[36]
Jackson, J. and Johnstone, J. The reasonable time requirement: an independent and meaningful right? [2005] Crim. L.R., Jan, 3. Criminal Law Review.
[37]
Malleson, K. 1996. Decision making in the Court of Appeal: the burden of proof in an inquisitorial process. International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 1, 4 (1996), 175–186.
[38]
Malleson, Kate et al. 1993. Review of the appeal process. HMSO.
[39]
Ministry of Justice: Youth justice: http://www.justice.gov.uk/youth-justice.
[40]
O’Connor, P. ‘Abuse of process’ after Warren and Mitchell [2012] Crim. L.R., 9, 672. Criminal Law Review.
[41]
Ormerod, D. et al. Prosecution appeals - too much of a good thing? [2010] Crim. L.R. 3, 169. Criminal Law Review.
[42]
Padfield, Nicola 2008. Text and materials on the criminal justice process. Oxford University Press.
[43]
Padfield, Nicola 2008. Text and materials on the criminal justice process. Oxford University Press.
[44]
Padfield, Nicola 2008. Text and materials on the criminal justice process. Oxford University Press.
[45]
R v JTB [2009] UKHL 20 (29 April 2009): http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2009/20.html.
[46]
Redmayne, M. *The Criminal Justice Act: (1) Disclosure and its discontents [2004] Crim LR 441. Criminal Law Review.
[47]
Resolutions and recommendations adopted by the Committee of Ministers: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/family/Resolutions_recommendations_cm_en.asp.
[48]
Review of disclosure in criminal proceedings - Gross LJ: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications-and-reports/reports/crime/review-disclosure-criminal-proceedings-september-2011.
[49]
Rules of engagement - changing the heart of youth justice: a policy report by the Youth Justice Working Group (January 2012): http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/rules-of-engagement.
[50]
Sanders, Andrew et al. 2010. Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
[51]
Sanders, Andrew et al. 2010. Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
[52]
Sanders, Andrew et al. 2010. Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Sanders, Andrew et al. 2010. Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
[54]
Sanders, Andrew et al. 2010. Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
[55]
Sharpe, S. *The Human Rights Act 1998: Part 3: Article 6 and the disclosure of evidence in criminal trials [1999] Crim LR 273. Criminal Law Review.
[56]
Shiels, R.S. The duties of a prosecutor [2012] Crim. L.R., 9, 687. Criminal Law Review.
[57]
Spencer, J.R. Quashing convictions for procedural irregularities [2007] Crim. L.R., Nov, 835. Criminal Law Review.
[58]
Sprack, John and Sprack, John 2012. A practical approach to criminal procedure. Oxford University Press.
[59]
Thompson, R. Grave crimes - now it’s personal [2012] Crim. L.R. 30. Criminal Law Review.
[60]
TP, R (on the application of) v West London Youth Court & Ors [2005] EWHC 2583 (Admin) (21 November 2005): http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/2583.html.
[61]
Youth Justice Board: http://www.justice.gov.uk/about/yjb.
[62]
*Blackstone’s Criminal Practice. [s.n.].
[63]
Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990).
[64]
Criminal Appeal Act 1968. s2.
[65]
Criminal Appeal Act 1995, s.13 (and generally).
[66]
Criminal Justice Act 2003, Part 9 (ss. 57-74).
[67]
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, ss 42, 44.
[68]
*Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, Part 1 (as amended).
[69]
*DPP v Humphrys [1977] AC 1.
[70]
European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 5 of the Convention: Right to liberty and security.
[71]
Executive Summary of Law Com No 269 - Bail and the Human Rights Act 1998.
[72]
Law Commission Paper Number 269, Bail and the Human Rights Act 1998.
[73]
R v Grant (Edward) [2006] QB 60 (CA).
[74]
R-v- Mouncher [2011] ruling.
[75]
SC v United Kingdom (2005) 40 E.H.R.R. 10.
[76]
T v United Kingdom (2000) 30 E.H.R.R. 121.
[77]
The Law Commission Guidance for Bail Decision-Takers and their Advisers.
[78]
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (the Beijing Rules).
[79]
Warren and others v Attorney General for Jersey [2012] 1 AC 22.