Bibliography for LMM107: Criminal Procedure 2 BETA

Ashworth, Andrew and Redmayne, Mike. The Criminal Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. The Criminal Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. The Criminal Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. The Criminal Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

‘Attorney Generals Guidelines on Disclosure: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/attorney_generals_guidelines_on_disclosure/>.

Ball, Caroline. ‘Youth Justice? Half a Century of Responses to Youth Offending [2004] Crim. L.R. 167’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

‘Bar Standards Board: Guidance on Preparation of Defence Statements’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/>.

Barsby, Clare, and D.C. Ormerod. ‘Special Advocates: Human Rights Act 1998 Sch. 1, Pt 1, Art. 6 [2004] Crim LR 861’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

‘*Blackstone’s Criminal Practice’. : n. pag. Print.

Boon, Andrew, and Susan Nash. ‘Special Advocacy: Political Expediency and Legal Roles in Modern Judicial Systems [2006] 9(1) Legal Ethics 101’. Legal Ethics n. pag. Web. <http://0-heinonline.org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lethics9&collection=journals&index=journals/lethics101&id=101>.

Choo, Andrew L. - T. Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Criminal Pleadings / Andrew L. - T. Choo. Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice. New York : Oxford University Press: N.p., 2008. Print.

Choo, Andrew L.-T. and Oxford Scholarship Online Law. Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Criminal Proceedings. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280834.001.0001>.

‘Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990)’. Web. <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf>.

‘Criminal Appeal Act 1968. S2’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-GVS0-TWPY-Y1P8&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Criminal Appeal Act 1995, s.13 (and Generally)’. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-GYD0-TWPY-Y14S&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Criminal Justice Act 2003, Part 9 (Ss. 57-74)’. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61N0-TWPY-Y1DV&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Ss 42, 44’. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61K0-TWPY-Y15R&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘*Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, Part 1 (as Amended)’. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC60-TWPY-Y0NT&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Criminal Procedure and Sentencing by Peter Hungerford-Welch - Updates on Companion Website to Book’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415442923/updates.asp>.

‘---’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415442923/updates.asp>.

‘---’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415442923/updates.asp>.

‘Criminal Procedure Rules’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal>.

‘Crown Prosecution Service v P [2007] EWHC 946 (Admin) (27 April 2007)’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2007/946.html>.

‘Disclosure Manual: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/disclosure_manual/>.

‘*DPP v Humphrys [1977] AC 1’. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-617P&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Elliott, Catherine. ‘Criminal Responsibility and Children: A New Defence Required to Acknowledge the Absence of Capacity and Choice (2011) 75 JCL 289’. Journal of Criminal Law n. pag. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=53D1-5Y41-DYJF-P03K&csi=280328&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 5 of the Convention: Right to Liberty and Security’. Web. <http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_5_ENG.pdf>.

‘Executive Summary of Law Com No 269 - Bail and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Web. <http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc269_Bail_and_the_Human_Rights_Act_summary.pdf>.

Great Britain. Double Jeopardy and Prosecution Appeals: Report on Two References under Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 : Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor...March 2001. LAW COM (Law Commission report). HMSO, 2001. Print.

---. The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice: Report: Cm 2263. London : HMSO: N.p., 1993. Print.

‘High Court’s Jurisdiction in Relation to Criminal Proceedings - Law Commission’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/high-courts-jurisdiction.htm>.

Hofmeyr, Kate. ‘The Problem of Private Entrapment [2006] Crim. L.R., Apr, 319’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Hoyano, Laura. ‘R v A: Perverting the Course of Justice [2013] Crim. L.R., 3, 240’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Hucklesby, Anthea. ‘Not Necessarily a Trip to the Police Station: The Introduction of Street Bail [2004] Crim LR 803’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Hungerford-Welch, Peter. ‘Abuse of Process: R v F - Delayed Complaint of Sexual Abuse [2012] Crim. L.R., 4, 282’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Hungerford-Welch, Peter. Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. 7th ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print.

---. Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. 7th ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print.

Hungerford-Welch, Peter. ‘Prosecution Interviews of Defence Witnesses [2010] Crim LR 690’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

---. ‘R v Austin: Abuse of Process - Disclosure - Non-Disclosure in Previous Proceedings Which Had Been Discontinued [2013] Crim. L.R., 11, 914’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

---. ‘R v Barkshire (David Robert): Evidence - Non-Disclosure - Evidence of Police Officer’s Activity Undermining Prosecution Case Not Disclosed to Defence [2012] Crim. L.R., 6, 453’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Hungerford-Welch, Peter and Hungerford-Welch, Peter. Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. 7th ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print.

---. Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. 7th ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print.

---. *Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. 7th ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print.

---. Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. 7th ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print.

---. Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. 7th ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print.

Jackson, John, and Jenny Johnstone. ‘The Reasonable Time Requirement: An Independent and Meaningful Right? [2005] Crim. L.R., Jan, 3’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

‘Law Commission Paper Number 269, Bail and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Web. <http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc269_Bail_and_the_Human_Rights_Act.pdf>.

Malleson, K. ‘Decision Making in the Court of Appeal: The Burden of Proof in an Inquisitorial Process’. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 1.4 (1996): 175–186. Web. <http://0-heinonline.org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intjevp1&collection=journals&index=journals/intjevp261&id=261>.

Malleson, Kate et al. Review of the Appeal Process. Research study / Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. London: HMSO, 1993. Print.

‘Ministry of Justice: Youth Justice’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.justice.gov.uk/youth-justice>.

O’Connor, Patrick. ‘“Abuse of Process” after Warren and Mitchell [2012] Crim. L.R., 9, 672’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Ormerod, David, Adrian Waterman, and Rudi Fortson. ‘Prosecution Appeals - Too Much of a Good Thing? [2010] Crim. L.R. 3, 169’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Padfield, Nicola. Text and Materials on the Criminal Justice Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.

---. Text and Materials on the Criminal Justice Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.

---. Text and Materials on the Criminal Justice Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.

‘R v Grant (Edward) [2006] QB 60 (CA)’. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K95-N7B0-TXD5-X1HT&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v JTB [2009] UKHL 20 (29 April 2009)’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2009/20.html>.

Redmayne, Mike. ‘*The Criminal Justice Act: (1) Disclosure and Its Discontents [2004] Crim LR 441’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

‘Resolutions and Recommendations Adopted by the Committee of Ministers’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/family/Resolutions_recommendations_cm_en.asp>.

‘Review of Disclosure in Criminal Proceedings - Gross LJ’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications-and-reports/reports/crime/review-disclosure-criminal-proceedings-september-2011>.

‘Rules of Engagement - Changing the Heart of Youth Justice: A Policy Report by the Youth Justice Working Group (January 2012)’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/rules-of-engagement>.

‘R-v- Mouncher [2011] Ruling’. Web. <http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-mouncher-ruling.pdf>.

Sanders, Andrew, Young, Richard, and Burton, Mandy. Criminal Justice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. Criminal Justice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. Criminal Justice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. Criminal Justice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. Criminal Justice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

‘SC v United Kingdom (2005) 40 E.H.R.R. 10’. : n. pag. Print.

Sharpe, Sybil. ‘*The Human Rights Act 1998: Part 3: Article 6 and the Disclosure of Evidence in Criminal Trials [1999] Crim LR 273’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Shiels, Robert S. ‘The Duties of a Prosecutor [2012] Crim. L.R., 9, 687’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Spencer, J.R. ‘Quashing Convictions for Procedural Irregularities [2007] Crim. L.R., Nov, 835’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

Sprack, John and Sprack, John. A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure. 14th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.

‘T v United Kingdom (2000) 30 E.H.R.R. 121’. : n. pag. Print.

‘The Law Commission Guidance for Bail Decision-Takers and Their Advisers’. Web. <http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc269_Bail_and_the_Human_Rights_Act_advice.pdf>.

Thompson, Richard. ‘Grave Crimes - Now It’s Personal [2012] Crim. L.R. 30’. Criminal Law Review n. pag. Print.

‘TP, R (on the Application of) v West London Youth Court & Ors [2005] EWHC 2583 (Admin) (21 November 2005)’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/2583.html>.

‘United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (the Beijing Rules)’. Web. <http://www.unodc.org/pdf/compendium/compendium_2006_part_01_02.pdf>.

‘Warren and Others v Attorney General for Jersey [2012] 1 AC 22’. Web. <http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.wam.city.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=54VK-NV21-F02Y-M41R&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Youth Justice Board’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.justice.gov.uk/about/yjb>.