1.
Douglas, B., Woolfe, R., Strawbridge, S., Kasket, E., Galbraith, V. eds: The handbook of counselling psychology. SAGE, London (2016).
2.
Kasket, Elaine: The counselling psychologist researcher. Counselling Psychology Review. 27, 64–73 (2012).
3.
Elena, Gil-Rodriguez, E., Kasket: The identity crisis in trainee counselling psychology research. Counselling Psychology Review. 26, 20–30 (2011).
4.
Henton, I.: The challenges of training in research and practice? | A blog, https://counsellingpsy.wordpress.com/2017/02/04/the-challenges-of-training-in-research-and-practice/.
5.
Carla, Willig, EBL.: Introducing qualitative research in psychology. McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead (2013).
6.
Bell, J., Waters, S.: Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers. McGraw Hill Education, London, England (2018).
7.
Wendy, Stainton Rogers, C., Willig: The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. SAGE Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (2017).
8.
Milton, M., Wiley InterScience (Online service), Wiley Online Library EBS.: Therapy and Beyond: Counselling Psychology Contributions for Therapeutic and Social Issues. Therapy and beyond: counselling psychology contributions to therapeutic and social issues. (16)AD. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470667279.
9.
McLeod, J.: Doing research in counselling and psychotherapy. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
10.
Robson, C., McCartan, K.: Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom (2016).
11.
O’Leary, Z.: The essential guide to doing your research project. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017).
12.
Silverman, D.: Doing qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2022).
13.
Henton, Isabel: Practice-based research and counselling psychology: A critical review and proposal. Counselling Psychology Review. 27, 11–28 (2012).
14.
Cooper, Mick1: Welcoming the Other: Actualising the humanistic ethic at the core of counselling psychology practice. Counselling Psychology Review. 24, 119–129 (2009).
15.
QAA Frameworks for Higher Education Qualifications, https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/qualifications-frameworks.pdf, (2014).
16.
QAA Doctoral Degree Characteristics, https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/doctoral-degree-characteristics-15.pdf?sfvrsn=50aef981_10.
17.
Lee, N.-J., EBL.: Achieving your professional doctorate. McGraw-Hill Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire (2009).
18.
Potter, S., Open University: Doing postgraduate research. Open University in association with SAGE Publications, Milton Keynes, U.K. (2006).
19.
Potter, S.: Doing postgraduate research. SAGE, London (2006).
20.
Cryer, P.: The research student’s guide to success. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead (2006).
21.
White, P.: Developing research questions: a guide for social scientists. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).
22.
Bor, R., Watts, M.H. eds: The trainee handbook: a guide for counselling and psychotherapy trainees. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017).
23.
Douglas, B., Woolfe, R., Strawbridge, S., Kasket, E., Galbraith, V. eds: The handbook of counselling psychology. SAGE, London (2016).
24.
Sharp, J.A., Peters, J., Howard, K.: The management of a student research project. Gower, Aldershot (2002).
25.
Phillips, E., Johnson, C., Phillips, E.: How to get a PhD: a handbook for students and their supervisors. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2022).
26.
Chamberlain, K. (2012). Do you really need a methodology? QMiP Bulletin, 13, 59-63, http://www.academia.edu/2022411/Chamberlain_K._2012_._Do_you_really_need_a_methodology_QMiP_Bulletin_13_59-63.
27.
Ponterotto, J.G.: Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 52, 126–136 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126.
28.
APA Handbooks in Psychology, APA PsycBOOKS.: APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Volume 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics. , Washington, D.C. (2012).
29.
Crotty, M.: The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1998).
30.
Hansen, J.T.: Thoughts on Knowing: Epistemic Implications of Counseling Practice. Journal of Counseling & Development. 82, 131–138 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00294.x.
31.
Maxwell, J.A.: What is Realism, and Why Should Qualitative Researchers Care, https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/44131_1.pdf, (2012).
32.
Willig, C.: Constructivism and ‘The Real World’: Can they co-exist? QMiP Bulletin. (2016).
33.
Dawn, Darlaston-Jones: Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods. The Australian Psychologist.
34.
Reicher, S.: Against methodolatry: Some comments on Elliott, Fischer, and Rennie. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 39, 1–6 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1348/014466500163031.
35.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, London (2011).
36.
Burr, V., Burr, V.: Social constructionism. Routledge, London (2003).
37.
Burr, V.: Social constructionism. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2015).
38.
Guba, E., Lincoln, Y.: Competing paradigms in qualitative research, https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PPP356/Guba%20%26%20Lincoln%201994.pdf.
39.
Richard, Young, B., Haverkamp: Paradigms, Purpose, and the Role of the Literature Formulating a Rationale for Qualitative Investigations. The Counseling Psychologist. 35, 265–294 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006292597.
40.
Madill, A., Gough, B.: Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods. 13, 254–271 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013220.
41.
Starks, H, Brown Trinidad, S: Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research. 17, 1372–1380 (2007).
42.
Nollaig, Frost: Pluralism in qualitative research: the impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research. 10, 441–460 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366802.
43.
Nicola J. Clarke: Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948980.
44.
Burck Charlotte: Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: the use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis. Journal of Family Therapy. 27, 237–262 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2005.00314.x.
45.
Kerry Chamberlain: Pluralisms in Qualitative Research: From Multiple Methods to Integrated Methods. Qualitative Research in Psychology. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.572730.
46.
Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N.: Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
47.
APA Handbooks in Psychology, APA PsycBOOKS.: APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Volume 2: Research designs : quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. , Washington, D.C. (2012).
48.
van der Wal, Dirk Mostert, M., Gerald Amandu: Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches. Nurse Researcher. 22, (2015). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.6.22.e1344.
49.
Willig, C.: The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. SAGE Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (2017).
50.
Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L.: Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
51.
David, Morgan: Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1, 48–76 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462.
52.
Alan, Bryman: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research. 6, 97–113 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
53.
Todd, Z.: Mixing methods in psychology: the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice. Psychology Press, Hove (2004).
54.
Foss, C., Ellefsen, B.: The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 40, 242–248 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02366.x.
55.
Shadish, W.R.: Philosophy of science and the quantitative-qualitative debates: Thirteen common errors. Evaluation and Program Planning. 18, 63–75 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(94)00050-8.
56.
Field, A.P.: Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
57.
CASP Checklists - Critiquing Research, https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
58.
Henton, I.: Criticality is critical in your literature review | A blog, https://counsellingpsy.wordpress.com/2016/09/10/criticality-is-critical-in-your-literature-review/.
59.
McLeod, J.: Doing research in counselling and psychotherapy. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
60.
Lee, N.-J., Ebook Central: Achieving your professional doctorate. McGraw-Hill Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire (2009).
61.
Cryer, P.: The research student’s guide to success. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead (2006).
62.
Murad, M.H., Guyatt, G., Cook, D.: How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care. JAMA. 312, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5559.
63.
Guyatt, G.: Users’ guides to the medical literature: essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York (2008).
64.
Guyatt, G.H.: Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: II. How to Use an Article About Therapy or Prevention B. What Were the Results and Will They Help Me in Caring for My Patients? JAMA. 270, (1993). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510210084032.
65.
Öst, L.-G.: Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 46, 296–321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.005.
66.
How to Critically Read Quantitative Research Using These 10 Questions, https://unstick.me/critically-read-quantitative-research/.
67.
BPS Statement on qualitative research in journals, https://web.archive.org/web/20210508103912/https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/statement-qualitative-research-journals.
68.
Grant, M.J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 26, 91–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
69.
Yardley, L.: Demonstrating the validity of qualitative research. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 12, 295–296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262624.
70.
Lucy Yardley: Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302.
71.
Bryman, A., Becker, S., Sempik, J.: Quality Criteria for Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research: A View from Social Policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 11, 261–276 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401644.
72.
Paul Price, Rajiv Jhangiani, I-Chant Chiang: Research Methods in Psychology. (2015).
73.
StatSoft: Electronic Statistics Textbook, http://www.statsoft.com/Textbook.
74.
Madill, Anna: Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology. 91, (2000).
75.
Williams, E.N., Morrow, S.L.: Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research. 19, 576–582 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802702113.
76.
Constance, Fischer, R., Elliott: Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 38, 215–229 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782.
77.
Nick, Pidgeon, K., Henwood: Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology. 83, 29–47 (1992).
78.
Morrow, S.: Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 52, 250–260 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
79.
Willig, C., Willig, C.: Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2013).
80.
John, Lewis: Redefining Qualitative Methods: Believability in the Fifth Moment. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 8, 1–14 (2009).
81.
Seale, C.: Quality in Qualitative Research. In: Qualitative research practice. pp. 379–389. SAGE, London (2004). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.d32.
82.
Seale, Clive, SAGE Research Methods Online: The quality of qualitative research. Sage Publications, London (1999).
83.
Member checks - Qualitative research guidelines project, http://www.qualres.org/HomeMemb-3696.html.
84.
James Drisko: Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education. 33, (1997).
85.
Birkbeck, University of London: Doing good IPA - Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, http://www.ipa.bbk.ac.uk/references/doinggoodipa.
86.
Smith, J.A.: Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review. 5, 9–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.510659.
87.
Smith, J.A.: Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: a reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria. Health Psychology Review. 5, 55–61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.541743.
88.
Gobo, G.: Sampling, Representativeness and Generalizability. In: Qualitative research practice. pp. 405–426. SAGE, London (2004). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.d34.
89.
Charmaz, K.: Constructing grounded theory. SAGE, London (2014).
90.
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., Larkin, M.: Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2022).
91.
Langdridge, D., Hagger-Johnson, G.: Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
92.
Breakwell, G.M., Wright, D.B., Barnett, J. eds: Research methods in psychology. SAGE, Los Angeles (2020).
93.
Willig, C., Willig, C.: Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2013).
94.
Charmaz, K.: Constructing grounded theory. SAGE, London (2014).
95.
Hollway, W., Jefferson, T., Hollway, W., Jefferson, T., Ebook Central: Doing qualitative research differently: a psychosocial approach. SAGE, London (2013).
96.
Riessman, C.K.: Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage, Los Angeles, Calif (2008).
97.
Finlay, L.: A Dance Between the Reduction and Reflexivity: Explicating the ‘Phenomenological Psychological Attitude’. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 39, 1–32 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1163/156916208X311601.
98.
Linda Finlay: The body’s disclosure in phenomenological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp051oa.
99.
Linda Finlay: Debating phenomenological research methods, http://www.psyking.net/HTMLobj-3824/Debating_Phenomenological_Research_Methods.pdf, (2009).
100.
Boden, Z., Eatough, V.: Understanding More Fully: A Multimodal Hermeneutic-Phenomenological Approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 11, 160–177 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.853854.
101.
Reavey, P., Taylor & Francis: Visual methods in psychology: using and interpreting images in qualitative research. Pyschology Press, Hove (2011).
102.
Crossley, M.: Introducing narrative psychology: self, trauma and the construction of meaning. Open University Press, Buckingham (2000).
103.
McAdams, D.P., Josselson, R., Lieblich, A., PsycBOOKS.: Identity and story: creating self in narrative. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2006).
104.
Langdridge, D.: Phenomenological psychology: theory, research and method. Pearson Prentice Hall, Harlow (2007).
105.
Marks, D., Yardley, L., SAGE Research Methods Online: Research methods for clinical and health psychology. SAGE, London (2004).
106.
Gubrium, J.F., SAGE Research Methods Online: The Sage handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2012).
107.
Brinkmann, S., Kvale, S.: InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
108.
Roulston, K., SAGE Research Methods Online: Reflective interviewing: a guide to theory and practice. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2010).
109.
Potter, J., Hepburn, A.: Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2, 281–307 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp045oa.
110.
Roulston, K.: Reflective interviewing: a guide to theory and practice. SAGE, London (2010).
111.
Steinar, Kvale: THE PSYCHOANALYTIC INTERVIEW AS INSPIRATION FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, http://www.psy.au.dk/fileadmin/Psykologi/Forskning/Kvalitativ_metodeudvikling/NB30/steinar_pta.pdf.
112.
Claire, Wright, A., Coyle: Using the Counselling Interview To Collect Research Data on Sensitive Topics. Journal of Health Psychology. 1, 431–440 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539600100402.
113.
Flick, U.: An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2023).
114.
Smith, J.A., Harre, R., Langenhove, L. van: Rethinking methods in psychology. SAGE, London (1995).
115.
McLeod, J.: Doing research in counselling and psychotherapy. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
116.
Gubrium, J.F., SAGE Research Methods Core: The Sage handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2012).
117.
Jorn, Cruikshank: The Role of Qualitative Interviews in Discourse Theory. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines. Vol. 6 (1): 38 – 52, (2012).
118.
Given, L.M., SAGE Research Methods Core: The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, Calif (2008).
119.
Finlay, L., Gough, B., Wiley InterScience (Online service): Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA.
120.
Linda Finlay: "Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research. 12, 531–545 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052.
121.
Anna Madill, B.G.: Subjectivity in psychological science: From problem to prospect. Psychological Methods. (2012).
122.
Lee, N.-J., Ebook Central: Achieving your professional doctorate. McGraw-Hill Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire (2009).
123.
Etherington Kim: Heuristic research as a vehicle for personal and professional development. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 4, 48–63 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140412331383973.
124.
Nollaig, Frost: Pluralism in qualitative research: the impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research. 10, 441–460 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366802.
125.
Ryan, L., Golden, A.: ‘Tick the Box Please’: A Reflexive Approach to Doing Quantitative Social Research. Sociology. 40, 1191–1200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506072287.
126.
BPS Code of Human Research Ethics (2014), https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/bps-code-human-research-ethics-2nd-edition-2014.
127.
Willig, C.: The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. SAGE Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (2017).
128.
McLeod, J.: Doing research in counselling and psychotherapy. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
129.
Andrew R. Thompson: Ethical Dilemmas for Clinical Psychologists in Conducting Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.630636.
130.
Harper, D., Thompson, A.R.: Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: a guide for students and practitioners. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2012).
131.
Kim Etherington: Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 13, 599–616 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301175.
132.
Flory, J., Emanuel, E.: Interventions to Improve Research Participants’ Understanding in Informed Consent for Research. JAMA. 292, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.
133.
Goldblatt, H., Karnieli-Miller, O., Neumann, M.: Sharing qualitative research findings with participants: Study experiences of methodological and ethical dilemmas. Patient Education and Counseling. 82, 389–395 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.016.
134.
Haverkamp, B.E.: Ethical perspectives on qualitative research in applied psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 52, 146–155 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.146.
135.
Danchev, D., Ross, A., SAGE Knowledge EBA.: Research ethics for counsellors, nurses and social workers. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
136.
Hammersley, M., Traianou, A., SAGE Research Methods Online: Ethics in qualitative research: controversies and contexts. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles [i.e. Thousand Oaks, Calif.] (2012).
137.
Milton, M.: Therapy and beyond: counselling psychology contributions to therapeutic and social issues. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex (2010).
138.
Lynn Gillam, M.G.: Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 10, 261–280 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
139.
Gavey, N., Braun, V.: Ethics and the publication of clinical case material. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 28, 399–404 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.28.4.399.
140.
Elena, Gil-Rodriguez, E., Kasket: The identity crisis in trainee counselling psychology research. Counselling Psychology Review. 26, 20–30 (2011).
141.
Lee, N.-J., Ebook Central: Achieving your professional doctorate. McGraw-Hill Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire (2009).
142.
Potter, S.: Doing postgraduate research. SAGE, London (2006).
143.
Ponterotto, J.G., Grieger, I.: Effectively Communicating Qualitative Research. The Counseling Psychologist. 35, 404–430 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287443.
144.
Etherington Kim: Writing qualitative research — A gathering of selves. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 1, 119–125 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140112331385158.
145.
Steven Keen: Strategies for Disseminating Qualitative Research Findings: Three Exemplars, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/285/625.
146.
Burton, S., Steane, P.: Surviving your thesis. Routledge, London (2004).
