1.
Lupton, D., Taylor & Francis: Risk. Routledge, London (2013).
2.
Symon, Andrew: Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh (2006).
3.
Murphy-Lawless, Jo: Reading birth and death: a history of obstetric thinking. Cork University Press, Cork (1998).
4.
Lowe, P., Ebook Central: Reproductive health and maternal sacrifice: women, choice and responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2016).
5.
Mander, R., Murphy-Lawless, J., Taylor & Francis: The politics of maternity. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2013).
6.
Lupton, D., Taylor & Francis: Risk. Routledge, London (2013).
7.
Symon, A.: Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh (2006).
8.
Joan Skinner: The midwife in the ‘risk’ society. New Zealand College of Midwives - Journal. 28, 4–7 (2003).
9.
Pairman, S., Tracy, S.K., Thorogood, C., Pincombe, J.: Midwifery: preparation for practice. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, Sydney (2015).
10.
Symon, A.: Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh (2006).
11.
Taylor-Gooby, Peter, Zinn, Jens: Risk in social science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
12.
Scamell, M.: Childbirth Within the Risk Society. Sociology Compass. 8, 917–928 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12077.
13.
Lupton, D.: Risk and emotion: towards an alternative theoretical perspective. Health, Risk & Society. 15, 634–647 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.848847.
14.
Hammer, R.P., Burton-Jeangros, C.: Tensions around risks in pregnancy: A typology of women’s experiences of surveillance medicine. Social Science & Medicine. 93, 55–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.033.
15.
Molly Wiant Cummins: Reproductive Surveillance:  The Making of Pregnant Docile Bodies, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.686.9862&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
16.
Thomas, G.M., Lupton, D.: Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption. Health, Risk & Society. 17, 495–509 (2016).
17.
Robertson, J.H., Thomson, A.M.: A phenomenological study of the effects of clinical negligence litigation on midwives in England: The personal perspective. Midwifery. 30, e121–e130 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.12.003.
18.
Hannah Dahlen: Undone by fear? Deluded by trust? Midwifery. 26, 156–162 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2009.11.008.
19.
Mandie Scamell: Time, risk and midwife practice: the vaginal examination. Health, Risk & Society. 16, 84–100 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.874549.
20.
Scamell Mandie: The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: a tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociology of Health & Illness. 33, 987–1001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01366.x.
21.
Skinner, J., Maude, R.: The tensions of uncertainty: Midwives managing risk in and of their practice. Midwifery. 38, 35–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.006.
22.
Lane, K., Reiger, K.: Regime change in Australian maternity hospitals. Social Theory & Health. 11, 407–427 (2013).
23.
Fit to Reproduce? The Regulative Role of Pregnancy Texts. Feminism & Psychology. 10, 351–366 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010003005.
24.
Armstrong, D.: The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness. 17, 393–404 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10933329.
25.
Coxon, K., Homer, C., Bisits, A., Sandall, J., Bick, D.: Reconceptualising risk in childbirth. Midwifery. 38, 1–5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.012.
26.
Healy, S., Humphreys, E., Kennedy, C.: Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review. Women and Birth. 29, 107–116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.010.
27.
Burton-Jeangros, C.: Surveillance of risks in everyday life: The agency of pregnant women and its limitations. Social Theory & Health. 9, 419–436 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2011.15.
28.
Lee, S., Ayers, S., Holden, D.: A metasynthesis of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies. Midwifery. 30, 403–411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.010.
29.
Lee, S., Ayers, S., Holden, D.: Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: A systematic review. Health, Risk & Society. 14, 511–531 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2012.701277.
30.
Gupton, A., Heaman, M., Cheung, L.W.-K.: Complicated and Uncomplicated Pregnancies: Women’s Perception of Risk. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 30, 192–201 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01535.x.
31.
Jackson, M., Dahlen, H., Schmied, V.: Birthing outside the system: Perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths. Midwifery. 28, 561–567 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.002.
32.
Bayrampour, H., Heaman, M., Duncan, K.A., Tough, S.: Predictors of Perception of Pregnancy Risk among Nulliparous Women, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1552-6909.12215, (2013).
33.
Bayrampour, H., Heaman, M., Duncan, K.A., Tough, S.: Advanced maternal age and risk perception: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 12, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-100.
34.
Levy, V.: Maintaining equilibrium: a grounded theory study of the processes involved when women make informed choices during pregnancy. Midwifery. 15, 109–119 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-6138(99)90007-4.
35.
Jackson, C., Bosio, P., Habiba, M., Waugh, J., Kamal, P., Dixon-Woods, M.: Referral and attendance at a specialist antenatal clinic: qualitative study of women’s views. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 113, 909–913 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01016.x.
36.
Commentary by Smeltzer. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 28, 230–231 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945905282306.
37.
Bayrampour Hamideh, Heaman Maureen, Duncan Karen A., Tough Suzanne: Comparison of Perception of Pregnancy Risk of Nulliparous Women of Advanced Maternal Age and Younger Age. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 57, 445–453 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00188.x.
38.
Bayrampour, H., Heaman, M., Duncan, K.A., Tough, S.: Advanced maternal age and risk perception: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 12, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-100.
39.
Kirstie Coxon: Reconceptualising risk in childbirth. Midwifery. 38, 1–5 (2016). https://doi.org/DOI:            https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.876191.
40.
P Brocklehurst: Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 343, d7400–d7400 (2011). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1136/bmj.d7400.
41.
Coxon, K., Sandall, J., Fulop, N.J.: To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society. 16, 51–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.859231.
42.
Kennedy, H.P., Nardini, K., McLeod-Waldo, R., Ennis, L.: Top-Selling Childbirth Advice Books: A Discourse Analysis. Birth. 36, 318–324 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00359.x.
43.
Jackson, C., Land, V., Holmes, E.J.B.: Healthcare professionals’ assertions and women’s responses during labour: A conversation analytic study of data from One born every minute. Patient Education and Counseling. 100, 465–472 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.004.
44.
Seale, C., 2003. Health and media: an overview. Sociology of health & illness, 25(6), pp.513-531., https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.wam.city.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00356.
45.
Making evidence about risks and benefits accessible to parents, https://www.nct.org.uk/sites/default/files/related_documents/Coxon%20Making%20evidence%20about%20risks%20and%20benefits%20accessible%20to%20parents%20PerspSept12%20p5-6%20No%20advert.pdf.
46.
The King’s Fund: Safe Births: Everybody’s business: An independent inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England.
47.
Risk and the Midwife: a Descriptive and Interpretive Examination of the Referral for Obstetric Consultation Practices and Attitudes of New Zealand Midwives, http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/56.
48.
MacKenzie Bryers, H., van Teijlingen, E.: Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery. 26, 488–496 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.003.
49.
Midwifery. 26,.
50.
Reiger, K., Dempsey, R.: Performing birth in a culture of fear: an embodied crisis of late modernity. Health Sociology Review. 15, 364–373 (2006). https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2006.15.4.364.
51.
Edwards, N.P., Mander, R., Murphy-Lawless, J. eds: Untangling the maternity crisis. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2018).
52.
Edwards, N.P., Mander, R., Murphy-Lawless, J. eds: Untangling the maternity crisis. Routledge,Taylor & Francis Group, London (2018).
53.
Dahlen, H.: Undone by fear? Deluded by trust? Midwifery. 26, 156–162 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2009.11.008.
54.
Lee, E.: Breast-Feeding Advocacy, Risk Society and Health Moralism: A Decade’s Scholarship. Sociology Compass. 5, 1058–1069 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00424.x.
55.
Precarious beginnings: Gendered risk discourses in psychiatric research literature about postpartum depression. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. 14, 451–466 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459309358595.
56.
Mead, M., Bogaerts, A., Reyns, M.: Midwives’ perception of the intrapartum risk of healthy nulliparae in spontaneous labour, in The Flanders, Belgium. Midwifery. 23, 361–371 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2006.05.003.
57.
Possamai-Inesedy, A.: Confining risk: Choice and responsibility in childbirth in a risk society. Health Sociology Review. 15, 406–414 (2006). https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2006.15.4.406.
58.
Perspectives on risk, or risk in perspective. Essentially MIDIRS. 2, 17–21 (2011).
59.
Weir, L., Taylor & Francis: Pregnancy, risk and biopolitics: on the threshold of the living subject. Routledge, London (2006).
60.
Beck, Ulrich: Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London (1992).
61.
Lupton, D., Taylor & Francis: Risk. Routledge, London (2013).
62.
MacKenzie Bryers, H., van Teijlingen, E.: Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery. 26, 488–496 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.003.
63.
Skinner, J.: Risk: Let’s look at the bigger picture. Women and Birth. 21, 53–54 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2008.03.007.
64.
Dr.  Annmarie  Ruston  Director of Research: Interpreting and managing risk in a machine bureaucracy: Professional decision-making in NHS Direct. Health, Risk & Society. 8, 257–271 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570600871729.
65.
Dare To Know | Prof. Frank Furedi | TEDxLimassol, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5iQNY11xH8, (2015).
66.
Pairman, S., Tracy, S.K., Thorogood, C., Pincombe, J.: Midwifery: preparation for practice. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, Sydney (2015).
67.
Symon, A.: Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh (2006).
68.
Michael Power: The risk management of everything. The journal of risk finance. 5, (2004).
69.
Petrovska, K., Sheehan, A., Homer, C.S.E.: Media Representations of Breech Birth: A Prospective Analysis of Web-Based News Reports. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 62, 434–441 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12609.
70.
Boyce, T.: Health, risk and news: the MMR vaccine and the media. Peter Lang, New York (2007).
71.
Healy, S., Humphreys, E., Kennedy, C.: A qualitative exploration of how midwives’ and obstetricians’ perception of risk affects care practices for low-risk women and normal birth. Women and Birth. 30, 367–375 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.02.005.
72.
Healy, S., Humphreys, E., Kennedy, C.: Can maternity care move beyond risk? Implications for midwifery as a profession. British Journal of Midwifery. 24, 203–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2016.24.3.203.
73.
Booker, C., North, R.: Scared to death: from BSE to global warming, how scares are costing us the earth. Continuum, London (2007).
74.
Luce, A., Cash, M., Hundley, V., Cheyne, H., van Teijlingen, E., Angell, C.: "Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 16, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0827-x.
75.
Dahlen, H.G., Homer, C.S.E.: ‘Motherbirth or childbirth’? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery. 29, 167–173 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.007.
76.
Victoria A Carne: Informed Choice or Informed Compliance?
77.
Seale, C., 2003. Health and media: an overview. Sociology of health & illness, 25(6), pp.513-531., https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.wam.city.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00356.