1.
Lupton D, Taylor & Francis. Risk [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203070161
2.
Symon, Andrew. Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
3.
Murphy-Lawless, Jo. Reading birth and death: a history of obstetric thinking. Cork: Cork University Press; 1998.
4.
Lowe P, Ebook Central. Reproductive health and maternal sacrifice: women, choice and responsibility [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=4720159
5.
Mander R, Murphy-Lawless J, Taylor & Francis. The politics of maternity [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203630617
6.
Lupton D, Taylor & Francis. Risk [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203070161
7.
Symon A. Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
8.
Joan Skinner. The midwife in the ‘risk’ society. New Zealand College of Midwives - Journal [Internet]. 2003;28:4–7. Available from: https://www.midwife.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Jnl-28-April-2013.pdf
9.
Pairman S, Tracy SK, Thorogood C, Pincombe J. Midwifery: preparation for practice. Third edition. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2015.
10.
Symon A. Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
11.
Taylor-Gooby, Peter, Zinn, Jens. Risk in social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
12.
Scamell M. Childbirth Within the Risk Society. Sociology Compass [Internet]. 2014 Jul;8(7):917–28. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/soc4.12077
13.
Lupton D. Risk and emotion: towards an alternative theoretical perspective. Health, Risk & Society. 2013 Dec;15(8):634–47.
14.
Hammer RP, Burton-Jeangros C. Tensions around risks in pregnancy: A typology of women’s experiences of surveillance medicine. Social Science & Medicine. 2013 Sep;93:55–63.
15.
Molly Wiant Cummins. Reproductive Surveillance: The Making of Pregnant Docile Bodies [Internet]. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.686.9862&rep=rep1&type=pdf
16.
Thomas GM, Lupton D. Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption. Health, Risk & Society [Internet]. 2016 Feb;17(7–8):495–509. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698575.2015.1127333
17.
Robertson JH, Thomson AM. A phenomenological study of the effects of clinical negligence litigation on midwives in England: The personal perspective. Midwifery. 2014 Mar;30(3):e121–30.
18.
Hannah Dahlen. Undone by fear? Deluded by trust? Midwifery. 2010;26(2):156–62.
19.
Mandie Scamell. Time, risk and midwife practice: the vaginal examination. Health, Risk & Society. 2014 Feb 21;16(1):84–100.
20.
Scamell Mandie. The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: a tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2011;33(7):987–1001.
21.
Skinner J, Maude R. The tensions of uncertainty: Midwives managing risk in and of their practice. Midwifery. 2016 Jul;38:35–41.
22.
Lane K, Reiger K. Regime change in Australian maternity hospitals. Social Theory & Health [Internet]. 2013;11(4):407–27. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263325317_Regime_change_in_Australian_maternity_hospitals
23.
Fit to Reproduce? The Regulative Role of Pregnancy Texts. Feminism & Psychology. 2000 Aug 1;10(3):351–66.
24.
Armstrong D. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1995 Jun;17(3):393–404.
25.
Coxon K, Homer C, Bisits A, Sandall J, Bick D. Reconceptualising risk in childbirth. Midwifery. 2016 Jul;38:1–5.
26.
Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review. Women and Birth. 2016 Apr;29(2):107–16.
27.
Burton-Jeangros C. Surveillance of risks in everyday life: The agency of pregnant women and its limitations. Social Theory & Health [Internet]. 2011 Nov;9(4):419–36. Available from: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:32829
28.
Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. A metasynthesis of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies. Midwifery. 2014 Apr;30(4):403–11.
29.
Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: A systematic review. Health, Risk & Society. 2012 Sep;14(6):511–31.
30.
Gupton A, Heaman M, Cheung LWK. Complicated and Uncomplicated Pregnancies: Women’s Perception of Risk. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2001 Mar;30(2):192–201.
31.
Jackson M, Dahlen H, Schmied V. Birthing outside the system: Perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths. Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):561–7.
32.
Bayrampour H, Heaman M, Duncan KA, Tough S. Predictors of Perception of Pregnancy Risk among Nulliparous Women [Internet]. Vol. 42, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2013. p. 416–27. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1552-6909.12215
33.
Bayrampour H, Heaman M, Duncan KA, Tough S. Advanced maternal age and risk perception: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012 Dec;12(1).
34.
Levy V. Maintaining equilibrium: a grounded theory study of the processes involved when women make informed choices during pregnancy. Midwifery. 1999 Jun;15(2):109–19.
35.
Jackson C, Bosio P, Habiba M, Waugh J, Kamal P, Dixon-Woods M. Referral and attendance at a specialist antenatal clinic: qualitative study of women’s views. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology [Internet]. 2006 Aug;113(8):909–13. Available from: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01016.x
36.
Commentary by Smeltzer. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2006 Mar 1;28(2):230–1.
37.
Bayrampour Hamideh, Heaman Maureen, Duncan Karen A., Tough Suzanne. Comparison of Perception of Pregnancy Risk of Nulliparous Women of Advanced Maternal Age and Younger Age. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2012;57(5):445–53.
38.
Bayrampour H, Heaman M, Duncan KA, Tough S. Advanced maternal age and risk perception: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012 Dec;12(1).
39.
Kirstie Coxon. Reconceptualising risk in childbirth. Midwifery [Internet]. 2016;38:1–5. Available from: https://www.midwiferyjournal.com/article/S0266-6138(16)30071-7/fulltext
40.
P Brocklehurst. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed) [Internet]. 2011;343:d7400–d7400. Available from: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3223531
41.
Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society. 2014 Jan 2;16(1):51–67.
42.
Kennedy HP, Nardini K, McLeod-Waldo R, Ennis L. Top-Selling Childbirth Advice Books: A Discourse Analysis. Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):318–24.
43.
Jackson C, Land V, Holmes EJB. Healthcare professionals’ assertions and women’s responses during labour: A conversation analytic study of data from One born every minute. Patient Education and Counseling. 2017 Mar;100(3):465–72.
44.
Seale, C., 2003. Health and media: an overview. Sociology of health & illness, 25(6), pp.513-531. [Internet]. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.wam.city.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00356
45.
Making evidence about risks and benefits accessible to parents [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nct.org.uk/sites/default/files/related_documents/Coxon%20Making%20evidence%20about%20risks%20and%20benefits%20accessible%20to%20parents%20PerspSept12%20p5-6%20No%20advert.pdf
46.
The King’s Fund. Safe Births: Everybody’s business: An independent inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England.
47.
Risk and the Midwife: a Descriptive and Interpretive Examination of the Referral for Obstetric Consultation Practices and Attitudes of New Zealand Midwives [Internet]. Available from: http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/56
48.
MacKenzie Bryers H, van Teijlingen E. Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery. 2010 Oct;26(5):488–96.
49.
Midwifery. 26(5). Available from: https://hz7fp2gl5k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=journal&rft.jtitle=Midwifery&rft.pub=Longman+Group&rft.issn=1532-3099&rft.eissn=1532-3099&rft.externalDocID=ssj0009407
50.
Reiger K, Dempsey R. Performing birth in a culture of fear: an embodied crisis of late modernity. Health Sociology Review. 2006 Oct;15(4):364–73.
51.
Edwards NP, Mander R, Murphy-Lawless J, editors. Untangling the maternity crisis. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018.
52.
Edwards NP, Mander R, Murphy-Lawless J, editors. Untangling the maternity crisis [Internet]. London: Routledge,Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315277059
53.
Dahlen H. Undone by fear? Deluded by trust? Midwifery. 2010 Apr;26(2):156–62.
54.
Lee E. Breast-Feeding Advocacy, Risk Society and Health Moralism: A Decade’s Scholarship. Sociology Compass. 2011 Dec;5(12):1058–69.
55.
Precarious beginnings: Gendered risk discourses in psychiatric research literature about postpartum depression. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. 2010 Sep 1;14(5):451–66.
56.
Mead M, Bogaerts A, Reyns M. Midwives’ perception of the intrapartum risk of healthy nulliparae in spontaneous labour, in The Flanders, Belgium. Midwifery. 2007 Dec;23(4):361–71.
57.
Possamai-Inesedy A. Confining risk: Choice and responsibility in childbirth in a risk society. Health Sociology Review. 2006 Oct;15(4):406–14.
58.
Perspectives on risk, or risk in perspective. Essentially MIDIRS. 2011;2(7):17–21.
59.
Weir L, Taylor & Francis. Pregnancy, risk and biopolitics: on the threshold of the living subject [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2006. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203966716
60.
Beck, Ulrich. Risk society: towards a new modernity. Vol. Theory, culture&society. London: Sage; 1992.
61.
Lupton D, Taylor & Francis. Risk [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203070161
62.
MacKenzie Bryers H, van Teijlingen E. Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery. 2010 Oct;26(5):488–96.
63.
Skinner J. Risk: Let’s look at the bigger picture. Women and Birth. 2008 Jun;21(2):53–4.
64.
Dr. Annmarie Ruston Director of Research. Interpreting and managing risk in a machine bureaucracy: Professional decision-making in NHS Direct. Health, Risk & Society. 2007 Jan 22;8(3):257–71.
65.
Dare To Know | Prof. Frank Furedi | TEDxLimassol [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5iQNY11xH8
66.
Pairman S, Tracy SK, Thorogood C, Pincombe J. Midwifery: preparation for practice. Third edition. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2015.
67.
Symon A. Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
68.
Michael Power. The risk management of everything. The journal of risk finance. 2004 Jan 1;5(3).
69.
Petrovska K, Sheehan A, Homer CSE. Media Representations of Breech Birth: A Prospective Analysis of Web-Based News Reports. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2017 Jul;62(4):434–41.
70.
Boyce T. Health, risk and news: the MMR vaccine and the media. Vol. v. 9. New York: Peter Lang; 2007.
71.
Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. A qualitative exploration of how midwives’ and obstetricians’ perception of risk affects care practices for low-risk women and normal birth. Women and Birth. 2017 Oct;30(5):367–75.
72.
Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Can maternity care move beyond risk? Implications for midwifery as a profession. British Journal of Midwifery. 2016 Mar 2;24(3):203–9.
73.
Booker C, North R. Scared to death: from BSE to global warming, how scares are costing us the earth. London: Continuum; 2007.
74.
Luce A, Cash M, Hundley V, Cheyne H, van Teijlingen E, Angell C. "Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016 Dec;16(1).
75.
Dahlen HG, Homer CSE. ‘Motherbirth or childbirth’? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery. 2013 Feb;29(2):167–73.
76.
Victoria A Carne. Informed Choice or Informed Compliance? Available from: https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/28/informed-choice-or-informed-compliance
77.
Seale, C., 2003. Health and media: an overview. Sociology of health & illness, 25(6), pp.513-531. [Internet]. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.wam.city.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00356
