[1]
G. John Ikenberry, ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 56–68, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
[2]
J. J. Mearsheimer, ‘The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 381–396, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1093/cjip/poq016.
[3]
W. I. Robinson, ‘The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.976012.
[4]
C. Weber and Taylor & Francis, International relations theory: a critical introduction, 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
[5]
C. Weber, International relations theory: a critical introduction, Fourth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
[6]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[7]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[8]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[9]
C. Enloe and JSTOR., Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
[10]
A. Acharya, ‘Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 619–637, May 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811406574.
[11]
Anghie, A., ‘Civilization and Commerce: The Concept of Governance in Historical Perspective’, Villanova Law Review, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://0-heinonline-org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/vllalr45&div=51&start_page=887&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
[12]
C. Weber and Taylor & Francis, International relations theory: a critical introduction, 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
[13]
C. Weber, International relations theory: a critical introduction, Fourth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
[14]
M. Barnett and R. Duvall, ‘Power in International Politics’, International Organization, vol. 59, no. 01, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050010.
[15]
J. M. Hobson and Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA., The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
[16]
J. M. Hobson, The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[17]
V. Prashad, ‘NEOLIBERALISM WITH SOUTHERN CHARACTERISTICS - The rise of the BRICS’, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/neoliberalism-with-southern-characteristics/
[18]
K. Hopewell, ‘The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance’, International Affairs, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1377–1396, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1093/ia/iix192.
[19]
SHIMAZU, NAOKO, ‘Diplomacy As Theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 48, pp. 225–252 [Online]. Available: https://0-search-proquest-com.wam.city.ac.uk/docview/1469760013?pq-origsite=summon
[20]
Cambridge Books Online EBS., Bandung, global history, and international law: critical pasts and pending futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/9781316414880
[21]
V. Rodrigues Vieira, ‘Beyond the Market: The Global South and the WTO’s Normative Dimension’, International Negotiation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 267–294, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1163/15718069-12341333.
[22]
S. Keukeleire and B. Hooijmaaijers, ‘The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 582–599, May 2014, doi: 10.1111/jcms.12102.
[23]
P. Xiaoyu, ‘Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 341–367, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1093/cjip/pos017.
[24]
Mark T. Berger, ‘After the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993775?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[25]
S. Hameiri and L. Jones, ‘Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 72–98, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1354066115578952.
[26]
M. C. Miller, ‘The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 211–238, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1093/cjip/pow006.
[27]
J. J. Mearsheimer, ‘The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 381–396, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1093/cjip/poq016.
[28]
P. K. Lee and L.-H. Chan, ‘China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria?’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 179–214, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968.
[29]
M. C. Miller and ProQuest (Firm), Wronged by empire: post-imperial ideology and foreign policy in India and China. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=1319336
[30]
J. T. Dreyer, ‘The “Tianxia Trope”: will China change the international system?’, Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 24, no. 96, pp. 1015–1031, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1030951.
[31]
Shaun Breslin, ‘Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 85, no. 4, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695092
[32]
W. A. Callahan, ‘Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony?’, International Studies Review, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 749–761, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00830.x.
[33]
M. Ferchen, ‘Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 390–420, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09692290.2012.660184.
[34]
S. Suzuki, ‘Why Does China Participate in Intrusive Peacekeeping? Understanding Paternalistic Chinese Discourses on Development and Intervention’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 271–285, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1080/13533312.2011.563079.
[35]
R. Kiely, ‘"Poverty’s Fall”/China’s Rise: Global Convergence or New Forms of Uneven Development?’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 353–372, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1080/00472330802078451.
[36]
J. W. Legro, ‘What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 5, no. 03, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S1537592707071526.
[37]
J. Logan, ‘China, America, and the Pivot to Asia | Cato Institute’, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/china-america-pivot-asia
[38]
D. Shambaugh, ‘Coping with a Conflicted China’, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 7–27, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2011.537974.
[39]
T. Summers, ‘China’s “New Silk Roads”: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1628–1643, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415.
[40]
P. Xiaoyu, ‘Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 341–367, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1093/cjip/pos017.
[41]
M. C. Miller and K. Sullivan de Estrada, ‘Pragmatism in Indian foreign policy: how ideas constrain Modi’, International Affairs, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 27–49, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1093/ia/iiw001.
[42]
A. NARLIKAR, ‘India rising: responsible to whom?’, International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 595–614, May 2013, doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12035.
[43]
IAN TAYLOR, ‘India’s rise in Africa’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 88, no. 4, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23255618?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=India%27s&searchText=rise&searchText=in&searchText=Africa&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2BIndia%2527s%2Brise%2Bin%2BAfrica%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100185&ab_segments=0%2Ftbsub-1%2Frelevance_config_with_tbsub&refreqid=search%3Acaf5d9907d63af2a8f7187028a7febf8&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[44]
R. Foot, J. L. Gaddis, A. Hurrell, ebrary, Inc, and Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science, Order and justice in international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F3738
[45]
A. Bloomfield, ‘India and the Libyan Crisis: Flirting with the Responsibility to Protect, Retreating to the Sovereignty Norm’, Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 27–55, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/13523260.2015.1012347.
[46]
J. Chiriyankandath, ‘Realigning India: Indian foreign policy after the Cold War’, The Round Table, vol. 93, no. 374, pp. 199–211, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1080/00358530410001679567.
[47]
S. Ganguly and M. S. Pardesi, ‘Explaining Sixty Years of India’s Foreign Policy’, India Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4–19, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1080/14736480802665162.
[48]
G. Kampani, ‘New Delhi’s Long Nuclear Journey’, International Security, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 79–114, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00158.
[49]
Andrew B. Kennedy, ‘India’s Nuclear Odyssey: Implicit Umbrellas, Diplomatic Disappointments, and the Bomb’, International Security, vol. 36, no. 2, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289700
[50]
W. C. Ladwig, ‘Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, "Look East,” and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific’, Asian Security, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 87–113, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1080/14799850902886476.
[51]
W. C. Ladwig, ‘India and Military Power Projection: Will the Land of Gandhi Become a Conventional Great Power?’, Asian Survey, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1162–1183, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1525/as.2010.50.6.1162.
[52]
P. B. Mehta, ‘Still Under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in India’, India Review, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 209–233, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1080/14736480903116750.
[53]
Michaelowa, KatharinaMichaelowa, Axel, ‘India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations’, Climate Policy, vol. 12, pp. 575–590, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321407678?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=14510
[54]
M. Chatterjee Miller, ‘The Un-Argumentative Indian?: Ideas About the Rise of India and Their Interaction With Domestic Structures’, India Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1080/14736489.2014.873670.
[55]
R. MUKHERJEE and D. M. MALONE, ‘Indian foreign policy and contemporary security challenges’, International Affairs, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 87–104, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00961.x.
[56]
Rohan Mukherjee and David M. Malone, ‘From High Ground to High Table: The Evolution of Indian Multilateralism’, Global Governance, vol. 17, no. 3, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23033750
[57]
Amrita Narlikar, ‘All That Glitters Is Not Gold: India’s Rise to Power’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 5, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20454975
[58]
V. Narang and P. Staniland, ‘Institutions and Worldviews in Indian Foreign Security Policy’, India Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 76–94, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/14736489.2012.674818.
[59]
H. V. PANT and J. M. SUPER, ‘India’s “non-alignment” conundrum: a twentieth-century policy in a changing world’, International Affairs, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 747–764, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12336.
[60]
H. V. Pant, ‘INDIAN FOREIGN POLICY CHALLENGES: SUBSTANTIVE UNCERTAINTIES AND INSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES’, Asian Affairs, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 90–101, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1080/03068370802658724.
[61]
D. Scott, ‘India’s "Extended Neighborhood” Concept: Power Projection for a Rising Power’, India Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 107–143, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1080/14736480902901038.
[62]
Vincent Wei-cheng Wang, ‘“Chindia” or Rivalry? Rising China, Rising India, and Contending Perspectives on India-China Relations’, Asian Perspective, vol. 35, no. 3, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704764
[63]
D. Scott, ‘The Great Power “Great Game” between India and China: “The Logic of Geography”’, Geopolitics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14650040701783243.
[64]
C. Pan, ‘The “Indo-Pacific” and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the Asian regional order’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 453–469, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10357718.2014.884054.
[65]
G. Kampani, ‘From existential to minimum deterrence: Explaining India’s decision to test’, The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12–24, Dec. 1998, doi: 10.1080/10736709808436732.
[66]
D. M. Ollapally, ‘Understanding Indian policy dilemmas in the Indo-Pacific through an India–US–China maritime triangle lens’, Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/09733159.2016.1181392.
[67]
M. Sornarajah, J. Wang, and Cambridge Books Online EBS., China, India and the International Economic Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511760235
[68]
D. Brewster, ‘Beyond the “String of Pearls”: is there really a Sino-Indian security dilemma in the Indian Ocean?’, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 133–149, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1080/19480881.2014.922350.
[69]
A. Palit, ‘India’s Economic and Strategic Perceptions of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative’, Geopolitics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 292–309, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1274305.
[70]
H. V. Pant and Cambridge Books Online EBS., The Rise of China: Implications for India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9788175969377/type/BOOK
[71]
S. D. Sharma and Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA., China and India in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609916
[72]
D. Brewster, ‘Indian Strategic Thinking about East Asia’, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 825–852, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/01402390.2011.627155.
[73]
J.-M. F. Blanchard and C. Flint, ‘The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative’, Geopolitics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 223–245, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503.
[74]
P. K. Lee and L.-H. Chan, ‘China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria?’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 179–214, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968.
[75]
O. Turner, ‘China, India and the US Rebalance to the Asia Pacific: The Geopolitics of Rising Identities’, Geopolitics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 922–944, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1190708.
[76]
Z. Guihong, ‘US-India Strategic Partnership’, International Studies, vol. 42, no. 3–4, pp. 277–293, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1177/002088170504200306.
[77]
A. E. Abdenur, M. Folly, K. Moura, S. A. S. Jordão, and P. Maia, ‘The BRICS and the South Atlantic: Emerging arena for South–South cooperation’, South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 303–319, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10220461.2014.972442.
[78]
J. van der Westhuizen, ‘Brazil and South Africa: the “odd couple” of the South Atlantic?’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 232–251, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14662043.2016.1151169.
[79]
F. Merke, ‘Neither balance nor bandwagon: South American international society meets Brazil’s rising power’, International Politics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 178–192, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.49.
[80]
Ogunnubi, ‘South Africa and the Question of Hegemony in Africa’, Journal of developing societies, vol. 33, no. 4, 2017.
[81]
Marco Antonio Vieira and Chris Alden, ‘India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership’, Global Governance, vol. 17, no. 4, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23104289?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22india%2C+brazil+and+south+africa%22&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522india%252C%2Bbrazil%2Band%2Bsouth%2Bafrica%2522%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000814&refreqid=search%3Afd8a0d48c16faddc1066d4c0d180c142&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[82]
E. Jordaan, ‘Rising Powers and Human Rights: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum at the UN Human Rights Council’, Journal of Human Rights, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 463–485, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1080/14754835.2014.988784.
[83]
Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira, ‘The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 7, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/4017805?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[84]
M. E. Carranza, ‘Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status’, Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a-n/a, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1111/fpa.12065.
[85]
D. McDougall, ‘Responsibility While Protecting’, Global Responsibility to Protect, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 64–87, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1163/1875984X-00601004.
[86]
O. Stuenkel and M. Tourinho, ‘Regulating intervention: Brazil and the responsibility to protect’, Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 379–402, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1080/14678802.2014.930593.
[87]
A. E. Abdenur, ‘Rising powers in stormy seas: Brazil and the UNIFIL maritime task force’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 389–415, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/13533312.2016.1155413.
[88]
P. Dauvergne and D. BL Farias, ‘The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 903–917, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1080/01436597.2012.674704.
[89]
A. de Freitas Barbosa, T. Narciso, and M. Biancalana, ‘Brazil in Africa: Another Emerging Power in the Continent?’, Politikon, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 59–86, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1080/02589340903155401.
[90]
Andrés Malamud, ‘A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 53, no. 3, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/41342327?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[91]
G. de L. T. Oliveira, ‘The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 348–372, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.992337.
[92]
P. Sotero, ‘Brazil’s Rising Ambition in a Shifting Global Balance of Power’, Politics, vol. 30, no. 1_suppl, pp. 71–81, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01394.x.
[93]
P. Cunliffe and K. M. Kenkel, Eds., Brazil as a rising power: intervention norms and the contestation of global order, vol. 113. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
[94]
Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA., Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781316460191
[95]
M. Chatin, ‘Brazil: analysis of a rising soft power’, Journal of Political Power, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 369–393, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232286.
[96]
C. ALDEN and M. SCHOEMAN, ‘South Africa in the company of giants: the search for leadership in a transforming global order’, International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 111–129, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12007.
[97]
C. Alden and M. Soko, ‘South Africa’s economic relations with Africa: hegemony and its discontents’, The Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 367–392, Jul. 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0022278X05001011.
[98]
C. Alden and M. Schoeman, ‘South Africa’s symbolic hegemony in Africa’, International Politics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 239–254, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.47.
[99]
P. Bond, ‘Sub-imperialism as Lubricant of Neoliberalism: South African “deputy sheriff” duty within’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 251–270, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.775783.
[100]
D. J. Hornsby and D. R. Black, ‘Breaking with tradition? South Africa–UK relations’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 268–286, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14662043.2016.1151167.
[101]
J. Pretorius and T. Sauer, ‘The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns’, South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 321–334, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10220461.2014.965273.
[102]
H. Verhoeven, C. S. R. Murthy, and R. Soares de Oliveira, ‘“Our identity is our currency”: South Africa, the responsibility to protect and the logic of African intervention’, Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 509–534, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1080/14678802.2014.930594.
[103]
A. Beresford, ‘A responsibility to protect Africa from the West? South Africa and the NATO intervention in Libya’, International Politics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 288–304, May 2015, doi: 10.1057/ip.2015.11.
[104]
A. Habib, ‘South Africa’s foreign policy: hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation’, South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 143–159, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1080/10220460903265857.
[105]
Janis Van Der Westhuizen, ‘South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 3, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993132?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[106]
P. M. Schoeman, ‘South Africa as an emerging middle power’, African Security Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 47–58, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1080/10246029.2000.9628050.
[107]
John J. Mearsheimer, ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 93, no. 5, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24483306
[108]
Alexander J. Motyl, ‘THE SURREALISM OF REALISM: Misreading the War in Ukraine’, World Affairs, vol. 177, no. 5, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43555427
[109]
R. SAKWA, ‘“New Cold War” or twenty years’ crisis? Russia and international politics’, International Affairs, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 241–267, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00702.x.
[110]
Derek Averre, ‘From Pristina to Tskhinvali: The Legacy of Operation Allied Force in Russia’s Relations with the West’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 85, no. 3, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695032
[111]
A. Cooley, ‘Chapter 1: Russia and the Recent Evolution of the SCO: Issues and Challenges for U.S. Policy - American Academy of Arts & Sciences’. [Online]. Available: https://www.amacad.org/content/publications/pubContent.aspx?d=1135
[112]
T. Forsberg and G. Herd, ‘Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 41–57, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/14782804.2014.1001824.
[113]
H. Haukkala, ‘From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 25–40, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822.
[114]
J. Hughes, ‘Russia and the Secession of Kosovo: Power, Norms and the Failure of Multilateralism’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 992–1016, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09668136.2013.792448.
[115]
J. Howorth, ‘“Stability on the Borders”: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 121–136, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1111/jcms.12448.
[116]
Sebastian Job, ‘Globalising Russia? The Neoliberal/Nationalist Two-Step and the Russification of the West’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 6, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993455
[117]
X. Kurowska, ‘Multipolarity as resistance to liberal norms: Russia’s position on responsibility to protect’, Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 489–508, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1080/14678802.2014.930589.
[118]
C. Peng, ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective’, International Critical Thought, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 267–278, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1080/21598282.2017.1316436.
[119]
T. Romanova, ‘Is Russian Energy Policy towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package’, Geopolitics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 857–879, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1155049.
[120]
R. Sakwa, ‘The problem of “the international” in Russian identity formation’, International Politics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 449–465, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1057/ip.2012.10.
[121]
R. Sakwa and Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA., Russia against the rest: the post-Cold War crisis of world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675885
[122]
Hugh Gusterson, ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 14, no. 1, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/656531
[123]
Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 91, no. 4, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
[124]
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N, ‘Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 91, pp. 157–162 [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
[125]
J. Pretorius and T. Sauer, ‘The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns’, South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 321–334, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10220461.2014.965273.
[126]
H. Gusterson, ‘Paranoid, Potbellied Stalinist Gets Nuclear Weapons’, The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–42, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1080/10736700701852894.
[127]
Scott Sagan, Kenneth Waltz and Richard K. Betts, ‘A NUCLEAR IRAN: PROMOTING STABILITY OR COURTING DISASTER?’, Journal of International Affairs, vol. 60, no. 2, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357975
[128]
H. Moshirzadeh, ‘Discursive Foundations of Iran’s Nuclear Policy’, Security Dialogue, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 521–543, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0967010607084999.
[129]
Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 91, no. 4, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
[130]
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N, ‘Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 91, pp. 157–162 [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
[131]
H. Müller, ‘Icons Off the Mark’, The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 545–565, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1080/10736700.2013.849911.
[132]
A. V. Kumar and Cambridge Books Online EBS., India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: The Perennial Outlier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297319
[133]
L. Buszynski, ‘The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry’, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 139–156, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2012.666495.
[134]
M. Taylor Fravel, ‘Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes’, International Security, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 46–83, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.wam.city.ac.uk/article/190698
[135]
‘The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status, and implications’ [Online]. Available: https://hz7fp2gl5k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE+NINE-DASH+LINE+IN+THE+SOUTH+CHINA+SEA%3A+HISTORY%2C+STATUS%2C+AND+IMPLICATIONS&rft.jtitle=AMERICAN+JOURNAL+OF+INTERNATIONAL+LAW&rft.au=Gao%2C+ZG&rft.au=Jia%2C+BB&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.pub=AMER+SOC+INT+LAW&rft.issn=0002-9300&rft.eissn=2161-7953&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000316626600004&paramdict=en-UK
[136]
M. G. Koo, ‘Belling the Chinese Dragon at Sea: Western Theories and Asian Realities’, Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 52–68, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00908320.2017.1265365.
[137]
B. Jerden, ‘The Assertive China Narrative: Why It Is Wrong and How So Many Still Bought into It’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–88, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1093/cjip/pot019.
[138]
P. Kreuzer, ‘A Comparison of Malaysian and Philippine Responses to China in the South China Sea’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 239–276, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1093/cjip/pow008.
[139]
J. W. Lewis and X. Litai, ‘China’s security agenda transcends the South China Sea’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 212–221, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00963402.2016.1194056.
[140]
A. P. Liff and G. J. Ikenberry, ‘Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma’, International Security, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 52–91, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00176.
[141]
K. MORTON, ‘China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible?’, International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 909–940, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12658.
[142]
S. Raine, ‘Beijing’s South China Sea Debate’, Survival, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 69–88, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00396338.2011.621633.
[143]
D. Scott, ‘India’s Role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in Play’, India Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 51–69, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/14736489.2013.786965.
[144]
M. Yahuda, ‘China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea’, Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 22, no. 81, pp. 446–459, May 2013, doi: 10.1080/10670564.2012.748964.
[145]
F. Zhang (张 锋), ‘Assessing China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 440–459, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/10357718.2017.1287876.