1.
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2011;90(3):56–68. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
2.
Mearsheimer JJ. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2010 Dec 1;3(4):381–96.
3.
Robinson WI. The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective. Third World Quarterly. 2015 Jan 2;36(1):1–21.
4.
Weber C, Taylor & Francis. International relations theory: a critical introduction [Internet]. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2014. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
5.
Weber C. International relations theory: a critical introduction. Fourth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
6.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
7.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
8.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
9.
Enloe C, JSTOR. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics [Internet]. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2014. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
10.
Acharya A. Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 May;39(3):619–37.
11.
Anghie, A. Civilization and Commerce: The Concept of Governance in Historical Perspective [Internet]. Villanova Law Review. 2000. Available from: https://0-heinonline-org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/vllalr45&div=51&start_page=887&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
12.
Weber C, Taylor & Francis. International relations theory: a critical introduction [Internet]. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2014. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
13.
Weber C. International relations theory: a critical introduction. Fourth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
14.
Barnett M, Duvall R. Power in International Politics. International Organization. 2005 Jan;59(01).
15.
Hobson JM, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
16.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
17.
Prashad V. NEOLIBERALISM WITH SOUTHERN CHARACTERISTICS - The rise of the BRICS [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/neoliberalism-with-southern-characteristics/
18.
Hopewell K. The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance. International Affairs. 2017 Nov 1;93(6):1377–96.
19.
SHIMAZU, NAOKO. Diplomacy As Theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies [Internet]. 48:225–52. Available from: https://0-search-proquest-com.wam.city.ac.uk/docview/1469760013?pq-origsite=summon
20.
Cambridge Books Online EBS. Bandung, global history, and international law: critical pasts and pending futures [Internet]. Eslava L, Fakhri M, Nesiah V, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://0-doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/9781316414880
21.
Rodrigues Vieira V. Beyond the Market: The Global South and the WTO’s Normative Dimension. International Negotiation. 2016 Jun 2;21(2):267–94.
22.
Keukeleire S, Hooijmaaijers B. The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2014 May;52(3):582–99.
23.
Xiaoyu P. Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2012 Dec 1;5(4):341–67.
24.
Mark T. Berger. After the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 2004;25(1). Available from: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993775?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
25.
Hameiri S, Jones L. Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China. European Journal of International Relations. 2016 Mar;22(1):72–98.
26.
Miller MC. The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2016 Jun;9(2):211–38.
27.
Mearsheimer JJ. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2010 Dec 1;3(4):381–96.
28.
Lee PK, Chan LH. China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2016 Mar 3;70(2):179–214.
29.
Miller MC, ProQuest (Firm). Wronged by empire: post-imperial ideology and foreign policy in India and China [Internet]. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=1319336
30.
Dreyer JT. The ‘Tianxia Trope’: will China change the international system? Journal of Contemporary China. 2015 Nov 2;24(96):1015–31.
31.
Shaun Breslin. Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) [Internet]. 2009;85(4). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695092
32.
Callahan WA. Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review. 2008 Dec;10(4):749–61.
33.
Ferchen M. Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus. Review of International Political Economy. 2013 Apr;20(2):390–420.
34.
Suzuki S. Why Does China Participate in Intrusive Peacekeeping? Understanding Paternalistic Chinese Discourses on Development and Intervention. International Peacekeeping. 2011 Jun;18(3):271–85.
35.
Kiely R. "Poverty’s Fall”/China’s Rise: Global Convergence or New Forms of Uneven Development? Journal of Contemporary Asia. 2008 Aug;38(3):353–72.
36.
Legro JW. What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power. Perspectives on Politics. 2007 Sep;5(03).
37.
Logan J. China, America, and the Pivot to Asia | Cato Institute [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/china-america-pivot-asia
38.
Shambaugh D. Coping with a Conflicted China. The Washington Quarterly. 2011 Feb;34(1):7–27.
39.
Summers T. China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy. Third World Quarterly. 2016 Sep;37(9):1628–43.
40.
Xiaoyu P. Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2012 Dec 1;5(4):341–67.
41.
Miller MC, Sullivan de Estrada K. Pragmatism in Indian foreign policy: how ideas constrain Modi. International Affairs. 2017 Jan 1;93(1):27–49.
42.
NARLIKAR A. India rising: responsible to whom? International Affairs. 2013 May;89(3):595–614.
43.
IAN TAYLOR. India’s rise in Africa. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) [Internet]. 2012;88(4). Available from: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23255618?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=India%27s&searchText=rise&searchText=in&searchText=Africa&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2BIndia%2527s%2Brise%2Bin%2BAfrica%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100185&ab_segments=0%2Ftbsub-1%2Frelevance_config_with_tbsub&refreqid=search%3Acaf5d9907d63af2a8f7187028a7febf8&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
44.
Foot R, Gaddis JL, Hurrell A, ebrary, Inc, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science. Order and justice in international relations [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F3738
45.
Bloomfield A. India and the Libyan Crisis: Flirting with the Responsibility to Protect, Retreating to the Sovereignty Norm. Contemporary Security Policy. 2015 Jan 2;36(1):27–55.
46.
Chiriyankandath J. Realigning India: Indian foreign policy after the Cold War. The Round Table. 2004 Apr;93(374):199–211.
47.
Ganguly S, Pardesi MS. Explaining Sixty Years of India’s Foreign Policy. India Review. 2009 Feb 10;8(1):4–19.
48.
Kampani G. New Delhi’s Long Nuclear Journey. International Security. 2014 Apr;38(4):79–114.
49.
Andrew B. Kennedy. India’s Nuclear Odyssey: Implicit Umbrellas, Diplomatic Disappointments, and the Bomb. International Security [Internet]. 2011;36(2). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289700
50.
Ladwig WC. Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, "Look East,” and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific. Asian Security. 2009 Jun 5;5(2):87–113.
51.
Ladwig WC. India and Military Power Projection: Will the Land of Gandhi Become a Conventional Great Power? Asian Survey. 2010 Nov;50(6):1162–83.
52.
Mehta PB. Still Under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in India. India Review. 2009 Aug 13;8(3):209–33.
53.
Michaelowa, KatharinaMichaelowa, Axel. India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy [Internet]. 2012;12:575–90. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321407678?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=14510
54.
Chatterjee Miller M. The Un-Argumentative Indian?: Ideas About the Rise of India and Their Interaction With Domestic Structures. India Review. 2014 Jan 2;13(1):1–14.
55.
MUKHERJEE R, MALONE DM. Indian foreign policy and contemporary security challenges. International Affairs. 2011 Jan;87(1):87–104.
56.
Rohan Mukherjee and David M. Malone. From High Ground to High Table: The Evolution of Indian Multilateralism. Global Governance [Internet]. 2011;17(3). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23033750
57.
Amrita Narlikar. All That Glitters Is Not Gold: India’s Rise to Power. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 2007;28(5). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20454975
58.
Narang V, Staniland P. Institutions and Worldviews in Indian Foreign Security Policy. India Review. 2012 Apr;11(2):76–94.
59.
PANT HV, SUPER JM. India’s ‘non-alignment’ conundrum: a twentieth-century policy in a changing world. International Affairs. 2015 Jul;91(4):747–64.
60.
Pant HV. INDIAN FOREIGN POLICY CHALLENGES: SUBSTANTIVE UNCERTAINTIES AND INSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES. Asian Affairs. 2009 Mar;40(1):90–101.
61.
Scott D. India’s "Extended Neighborhood” Concept: Power Projection for a Rising Power. India Review. 2009 Jun;8(2):107–43.
62.
Vincent Wei-cheng Wang. ‘Chindia’ or Rivalry? Rising China, Rising India, and Contending Perspectives on India-China Relations. Asian Perspective [Internet]. 2011;35(3). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704764
63.
Scott D. The Great Power ‘Great Game’ between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography’. Geopolitics. 2008 Feb 15;13(1):1–26.
64.
Pan C. The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the Asian regional order. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2014 Aug 8;68(4):453–69.
65.
Kampani G. From existential to minimum deterrence: Explaining India’s decision to test. The Nonproliferation Review. 1998 Dec;6(1):12–24.
66.
Ollapally DM. Understanding Indian policy dilemmas in the Indo-Pacific through an India–US–China maritime triangle lens. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India. 2016 Jan 2;12(1):1–12.
67.
Sornarajah M, Wang J, Cambridge Books Online EBS. China, India and the International Economic Order [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511760235
68.
Brewster D. Beyond the ‘String of Pearls’: is there really a Sino-Indian security dilemma in the Indian Ocean? Journal of the Indian Ocean Region. 2014 Jul 3;10(2):133–49.
69.
Palit A. India’s Economic and Strategic Perceptions of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics. 2017 Apr 3;22(2):292–309.
70.
Pant HV, Cambridge Books Online EBS. The Rise of China: Implications for India [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9788175969377/type/BOOK
71.
Sharma SD, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. China and India in the Age of Globalization [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609916
72.
Brewster D. Indian Strategic Thinking about East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies. 2011 Dec;34(6):825–52.
73.
Blanchard JMF, Flint C. The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics. 2017 Apr 3;22(2):223–45.
74.
Lee PK, Chan LH. China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2016 Mar 3;70(2):179–214.
75.
Turner O. China, India and the US Rebalance to the Asia Pacific: The Geopolitics of Rising Identities. Geopolitics. 2016 Oct;21(4):922–44.
76.
Guihong Z. US-India Strategic Partnership. International Studies. 2005 Oct;42(3–4):277–93.
77.
Abdenur AE, Folly M, Moura K, Jordão SAS, Maia P. The BRICS and the South Atlantic: Emerging arena for South–South cooperation. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2014 Sep 2;21(3):303–19.
78.
van der Westhuizen J. Brazil and South Africa: the ‘odd couple’ of the South Atlantic? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 2016 Apr 2;54(2):232–51.
79.
Merke F. Neither balance nor bandwagon: South American international society meets Brazil’s rising power. International Politics. 2015 Feb;52(2):178–92.
80.
Ogunnubi. South Africa and the Question of Hegemony in Africa. Journal of developing societies. 2017;33(4).
81.
Marco Antonio Vieira and Chris Alden. India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership. Global Governance [Internet]. 2011;17(4). Available from: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23104289?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22india%2C+brazil+and+south+africa%22&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522india%252C%2Bbrazil%2Band%2Bsouth%2Bafrica%2522%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000814&refreqid=search%3Afd8a0d48c16faddc1066d4c0d180c142&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
82.
Jordaan E. Rising Powers and Human Rights: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum at the UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Human Rights. 2015 Oct 2;14(4):463–85.
83.
Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira. The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 2005;26(7). Available from: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/4017805?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
84.
Carranza ME. Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014 Jun;n/a-n/a.
85.
McDougall D. Responsibility While Protecting. Global Responsibility to Protect. 2014 Jan 1;6(1):64–87.
86.
Stuenkel O, Tourinho M. Regulating intervention: Brazil and the responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development. 2014 Aug 8;14(4):379–402.
87.
Abdenur AE. Rising powers in stormy seas: Brazil and the UNIFIL maritime task force. International Peacekeeping. 2016 May 26;23(3):389–415.
88.
Dauvergne P, BL Farias D. The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power. Third World Quarterly. 2012 Jun;33(5):903–17.
89.
de Freitas Barbosa A, Narciso T, Biancalana M. Brazil in Africa: Another Emerging Power in the Continent? Politikon. 2009 Apr;36(1):59–86.
90.
Andrés Malamud. A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy. Latin American Politics and Society [Internet]. 2011;53(3). Available from: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/41342327?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
91.
Oliveira G de LT. The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 2016 Mar 3;43(2):348–72.
92.
Sotero P. Brazil’s Rising Ambition in a Shifting Global Balance of Power. Politics. 2010 Dec;30(1_suppl):71–81.
93.
Cunliffe P, Kenkel KM, editors. Brazil as a rising power: intervention norms and the contestation of global order. Vol. 113. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2016.
94.
Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future [Internet]. Paul TV, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781316460191
95.
Chatin M. Brazil: analysis of a rising soft power. Journal of Political Power. 2016 Sep;9(3):369–93.
96.
ALDEN C, SCHOEMAN M. South Africa in the company of giants: the search for leadership in a transforming global order. International Affairs. 2013 Jan;89(1):111–29.
97.
Alden C, Soko M. South Africa’s economic relations with Africa: hegemony and its discontents. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 2005 Jul 28;43(3):367–92.
98.
Alden C, Schoeman M. South Africa’s symbolic hegemony in Africa. International Politics. 2015 Feb;52(2):239–54.
99.
Bond P. Sub-imperialism as Lubricant of Neoliberalism: South African ‘deputy sheriff’ duty within. Third World Quarterly. 2013 Mar;34(2):251–70.
100.
Hornsby DJ, Black DR. Breaking with tradition? South Africa–UK relations. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 2016 Apr 2;54(2):268–86.
101.
Pretorius J, Sauer T. The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2014 Sep 2;21(3):321–34.
102.
Verhoeven H, Murthy CSR, Soares de Oliveira R. ‘Our identity is our currency’: South Africa, the responsibility to protect and the logic of African intervention. Conflict, Security & Development. 2014 Aug 8;14(4):509–34.
103.
Beresford A. A responsibility to protect Africa from the West? South Africa and the NATO intervention in Libya. International Politics. 2015 May;52(3):288–304.
104.
Habib A. South Africa’s foreign policy: hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2009 Aug;16(2):143–59.
105.
Janis Van Der Westhuizen. South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 1998;19(3). Available from: https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993132?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
106.
Schoeman PM. South Africa as an emerging middle power. African Security Review. 2000 Jan;9(3):47–58.
107.
John J. Mearsheimer. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2014;93(5). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24483306
108.
Alexander J. Motyl. THE SURREALISM OF REALISM: Misreading the War in Ukraine. World Affairs [Internet]. 2015;177(5). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43555427
109.
SAKWA R. ‘New Cold War’ or twenty years’ crisis? Russia and international politics. International Affairs. 2008 Mar;84(2):241–67.
110.
Derek Averre. From Pristina to Tskhinvali: The Legacy of Operation Allied Force in Russia’s Relations with the West. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) [Internet]. 2009;85(3). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695032
111.
Cooley A. Chapter 1: Russia and the Recent Evolution of the SCO: Issues and Challenges for U.S. Policy - American Academy of Arts & Sciences [Internet]. Available from: https://www.amacad.org/content/publications/pubContent.aspx?d=1135
112.
Forsberg T, Herd G. Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015 Jan 2;23(1):41–57.
113.
Haukkala H. From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015 Jan 2;23(1):25–40.
114.
Hughes J. Russia and the Secession of Kosovo: Power, Norms and the Failure of Multilateralism. Europe-Asia Studies. 2013 Jul;65(5):992–1016.
115.
Howorth J. ‘Stability on the Borders’: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2017 Jan;55(1):121–36.
116.
Sebastian Job. Globalising Russia? The Neoliberal/Nationalist Two-Step and the Russification of the West. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 2001;22(6). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993455
117.
Kurowska X. Multipolarity as resistance to liberal norms: Russia’s position on responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development. 2014 Aug 8;14(4):489–508.
118.
Peng C. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective. International Critical Thought. 2017 Apr 3;7(2):267–78.
119.
Romanova T. Is Russian Energy Policy towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package. Geopolitics. 2016 Oct;21(4):857–79.
120.
Sakwa R. The problem of ‘the international’ in Russian identity formation. International Politics. 2012 Jul;49(4):449–65.
121.
Sakwa R, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Russia against the rest: the post-Cold War crisis of world order [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675885
122.
Hugh Gusterson. Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. 1999;14(1). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/656531
123.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2012;91(4). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
124.
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N. Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 91:157–62. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
125.
Pretorius J, Sauer T. The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2014 Sep 2;21(3):321–34.
126.
Gusterson H. Paranoid, Potbellied Stalinist Gets Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review. 2008 Mar;15(1):21–42.
127.
Scott Sagan, Kenneth Waltz and Richard K. Betts. A NUCLEAR IRAN: PROMOTING STABILITY OR COURTING DISASTER? Journal of International Affairs [Internet]. 2007;60(2). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357975
128.
Moshirzadeh H. Discursive Foundations of Iran’s Nuclear Policy. Security Dialogue. 2007 Dec;38(4):521–43.
129.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2012;91(4). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
130.
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N. Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 91:157–62. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
131.
Müller H. Icons Off the Mark. The Nonproliferation Review. 2013 Nov;20(3):545–65.
132.
Kumar AV, Cambridge Books Online EBS. India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: The Perennial Outlier [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297319
133.
Buszynski L. The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry. The Washington Quarterly. 2012 Apr;35(2):139–56.
134.
M. Taylor Fravel. Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes. International Security [Internet]. 2005 11;30(2):46–83. Available from: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.wam.city.ac.uk/article/190698
135.
The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status, and implications. Available from: https://hz7fp2gl5k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE+NINE-DASH+LINE+IN+THE+SOUTH+CHINA+SEA%3A+HISTORY%2C+STATUS%2C+AND+IMPLICATIONS&rft.jtitle=AMERICAN+JOURNAL+OF+INTERNATIONAL+LAW&rft.au=Gao%2C+ZG&rft.au=Jia%2C+BB&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.pub=AMER+SOC+INT+LAW&rft.issn=0002-9300&rft.eissn=2161-7953&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000316626600004&paramdict=en-UK
136.
Koo MG. Belling the Chinese Dragon at Sea: Western Theories and Asian Realities. Ocean Development & International Law. 2017 Jan 2;48(1):52–68.
137.
Jerden B. The Assertive China Narrative: Why It Is Wrong and How So Many Still Bought into It. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2014 Mar 1;7(1):47–88.
138.
Kreuzer P. A Comparison of Malaysian and Philippine Responses to China in the South China Sea. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2016 Sep;9(3):239–76.
139.
Lewis JW, Litai X. China’s security agenda transcends the South China Sea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2016 Jul 3;72(4):212–21.
140.
Liff AP, Ikenberry GJ. Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security. 2014 Oct;39(2):52–91.
141.
MORTON K. China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible? International Affairs. 2016 Jul;92(4):909–40.
142.
Raine S. Beijing’s South China Sea Debate. Survival. 2011 Nov;53(5):69–88.
143.
Scott D. India’s Role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in Play. India Review. 2013 Apr;12(2):51–69.
144.
Yahuda M. China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Journal of Contemporary China. 2013 May;22(81):446–59.
145.
Zhang (张 锋) F. Assessing China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2017 Jul 4;71(4):440–59.