Bibliography for IP1019: Emerging Powers in a changing world BETA

Abdenur, Adriana Erthal. ‘Rising Powers in Stormy Seas: Brazil and the UNIFIL Maritime Task Force’. International Peacekeeping 23.3 (2016): 389–415. Web.

---. ‘The BRICS and the South Atlantic: Emerging Arena for South–South Cooperation’. South African Journal of International Affairs 21.3 (2014): 303–319. Web.

Acharya, Amitav. ‘Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39.3 (2011): 619–637. Web.

ALDEN, CHRIS, and MAXI SCHOEMAN. ‘South Africa in the Company of Giants: The Search for Leadership in a Transforming Global Order’. International Affairs 89.1 (2013): 111–129. Web.

Alden, Chris, and Maxi Schoeman. ‘South Africa’s Symbolic Hegemony in Africa’. International Politics 52.2 (2015): 239–254. Web.

Alden, Chris, and Mills Soko. ‘South Africa’s Economic Relations with Africa: Hegemony and Its Discontents’. The Journal of Modern African Studies 43.3 (2005): 367–392. Web.

Alexander J. Motyl. ‘THE SURREALISM OF REALISM: Misreading the War in Ukraine’. World Affairs 177.5 (2015): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/43555427>.

Amrita Narlikar. ‘All That Glitters Is Not Gold: India’s Rise to Power’. Third World Quarterly 28.5 (2007): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20454975>.

Andrés Malamud. ‘A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy’. Latin American Politics and Society 53.3 (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/41342327?pq-origsite=summon&amp;seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents>.

Andrew B. Kennedy. ‘India’s Nuclear Odyssey: Implicit Umbrellas, Diplomatic Disappointments, and the Bomb’. International Security 36.2 (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289700>.

Anghie, A. ‘Civilization and Commerce: The Concept of Governance in Historical Perspective’. Villanova Law Review. N.p., 2000. Web. <https://0-heinonline-org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?public=true&amp;handle=hein.journals/vllalr45&amp;div=51&amp;start_page=887&amp;collection=journals&amp;set_as_cursor=0&amp;men_tab=srchresults>.

Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. ‘Power in International Politics’. International Organization 59.01 (2005): n. pag. Web.

Beresford, Alexander. ‘A Responsibility to Protect Africa from the West? South Africa and the NATO Intervention in Libya’. International Politics 52.3 (2015): 288–304. Web.

Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., and Colin Flint. ‘The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative’. Geopolitics 22.2 (2017): 223–245. Web.

Bloomfield, Alan. ‘India and the Libyan Crisis: Flirting with the Responsibility to Protect, Retreating to the Sovereignty Norm’. Contemporary Security Policy 36.1 (2015): 27–55. Web.

Bond, Patrick. ‘Sub-Imperialism as Lubricant of Neoliberalism: South African “Deputy Sheriff” Duty Within’. Third World Quarterly 34.2 (2013): 251–270. Web.

Brewster, David. ‘Beyond the “String of Pearls”: Is There Really a Sino-Indian Security Dilemma in the Indian Ocean?’ Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 10.2 (2014): 133–149. Web.

---. ‘Indian Strategic Thinking about East Asia’. Journal of Strategic Studies 34.6 (2011): 825–852. Web.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Print.

Buszynski, Leszek. ‘The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry’. The Washington Quarterly 35.2 (2012): 139–156. Web.

Callahan, William A. ‘Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-Hegemonic or a New Hegemony?’ International Studies Review 10.4 (2008): 749–761. Web.

Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future. Ed. T. V. Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Web. <http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781316460191>.

Cambridge Books Online EBS. Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Ed. Luis Eslava, Michael Fakhri, and Vasuki Nesiah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://0-doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/9781316414880>.

Carranza, Mario E. ‘Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status’. Foreign Policy Analysis (2014): n/a-n/a. Web.

Chatin, Mathilde. ‘Brazil: Analysis of a Rising Soft Power’. Journal of Political Power 9.3 (2016): 369–393. Web.

Chatterjee Miller, Manjari. ‘The Un-Argumentative Indian?: Ideas About the Rise of India and Their Interaction With Domestic Structures’. India Review 13.1 (2014): 1–14. Web.

Chiriyankandath, James. ‘Realigning India: Indian Foreign Policy after the Cold War’. The Round Table 93.374 (2004): 199–211. Web.

Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira. ‘The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism’. Third World Quarterly 26.7 (2005): n. pag. Web. <https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/4017805?pq-origsite=summon&amp;seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents>.

Cooley, Alexander. ‘Chapter 1: Russia and the Recent Evolution of the SCO: Issues and Challenges for U.S. Policy - American Academy of Arts & Sciences’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.amacad.org/content/publications/pubContent.aspx?d=1135>.

Cunliffe, Philip, and Kai Michael Kenkel, eds. Brazil as a Rising Power: Intervention Norms and the Contestation of Global Order. Vol. 113. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. Print.

Dauvergne, Peter, and Déborah BL Farias. ‘The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power’. Third World Quarterly 33.5 (2012): 903–917. Web.

de Freitas Barbosa, Alexandre, Thais Narciso, and Marina Biancalana. ‘Brazil in Africa: Another Emerging Power in the Continent?’ Politikon 36.1 (2009): 59–86. Web.

Derek Averre. ‘From Pristina to Tskhinvali: The Legacy of Operation Allied Force in Russia’s Relations with the West’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 85.3 (2009): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695032>.

Dreyer, June Teufel. ‘The “Tianxia Trope”: Will China Change the International System?’ Journal of Contemporary China 24.96 (2015): 1015–1031. Web.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

Enloe, Cynthia and JSTOR. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014. Web. <http://0-www.jstor.org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6>.

Ferchen, Matt. ‘Whose China Model Is It Anyway? The Contentious Search for Consensus’. Review of International Political Economy 20.2 (2013): 390–420. Web.

Foot, Rosemary et al. Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Web. <https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F3738>.

Forsberg, Tuomas, and Graeme Herd. ‘Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors’. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23.1 (2015): 41–57. Web.

G. John Ikenberry. ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’. Foreign Affairs 90.3 (2011): 56–68. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408>.

Ganguly, Sumit, and Manjeet S. Pardesi. ‘Explaining Sixty Years of India’s Foreign Policy’. India Review 8.1 (2009): 4–19. Web.

Guihong, Zhang. ‘US-India Strategic Partnership’. International Studies 42.3–4 (2005): 277–293. Web.

Gusterson, Hugh. ‘Paranoid, Potbellied Stalinist Gets Nuclear Weapons’. The Nonproliferation Review 15.1 (2008): 21–42. Web.

Habib, Adam. ‘South Africa’s Foreign Policy: Hegemonic Aspirations, Neoliberal Orientations and Global Transformation’. South African Journal of International Affairs 16.2 (2009): 143–159. Web.

Hameiri, Shahar, and Lee Jones. ‘Rising Powers and State Transformation: The Case of China’. European Journal of International Relations 22.1 (2016): 72–98. Web.

Haukkala, Hiski. ‘From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations’. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23.1 (2015): 25–40. Web.

Hobson, John M. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Print.

Hobson, John M. and Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139096829>.

Hopewell, Kristen. ‘The BRICS—Merely a Fable? Emerging Power Alliances in Global Trade Governance’. International Affairs 93.6 (2017): 1377–1396. Web.

Hornsby, David J., and David R. Black. ‘Breaking with Tradition? South Africa–UK Relations’. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 54.2 (2016): 268–286. Web.

Howorth, Jolyon. ‘“Stability on the Borders”: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55.1 (2017): 121–136. Web.

Hugh Gusterson. ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’. Cultural Anthropology 14.1 (1999): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/656531>.

Hughes, James. ‘Russia and the Secession of Kosovo: Power, Norms and the Failure of Multilateralism’. Europe-Asia Studies 65.5 (2013): 992–1016. Web.

IAN TAYLOR. ‘India’s Rise in Africa’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 88.4 (2012): n. pag. Web. <https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23255618?Search=yes&amp;resultItemClick=true&amp;searchText=India%27s&amp;searchText=rise&amp;searchText=in&amp;searchText=Africa&amp;searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2BIndia%2527s%2Brise%2Bin%2BAfrica%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100185&amp;ab_segments=0%2Ftbsub-1%2Frelevance_config_with_tbsub&amp;refreqid=search%3Acaf5d9907d63af2a8f7187028a7febf8&amp;seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents>.

Janis Van Der Westhuizen. ‘South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power’. Third World Quarterly 19.3 (1998): n. pag. Web. <https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993132?pq-origsite=summon&amp;seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents>.

Jerden, B. ‘The Assertive China Narrative: Why It Is Wrong and How So Many Still Bought into It’. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7.1 (2014): 47–88. Web.

John J. Mearsheimer. ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin’. Foreign Affairs 93.5 (2014): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/24483306>.

Jordaan, Eduard. ‘Rising Powers and Human Rights: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum at the UN Human Rights Council’. Journal of Human Rights 14.4 (2015): 463–485. Web.

Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N. ‘Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies’. Foreign Affairs 91 157–162. Web. <https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510>.

---. ‘Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies’. Foreign Affairs 91 157–162. Web. <https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510>.

Kampani, Gaurav. ‘From Existential to Minimum Deterrence: Explaining India’s Decision to Test’. The Nonproliferation Review 6.1 (1998): 12–24. Web.

---. ‘New Delhi’s Long Nuclear Journey’. International Security 38.4 (2014): 79–114. Web.

Kenneth N. Waltz. ‘Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability’. Foreign Affairs 91.4 (2012): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033>.

---. ‘Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability’. Foreign Affairs 91.4 (2012): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033>.

Keukeleire, Stephan, and Bas Hooijmaaijers. ‘The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52.3 (2014): 582–599. Web.

Kiely, Ray. ‘"Poverty’s Fall”/China’s Rise: Global Convergence or New Forms of Uneven Development?’ Journal of Contemporary Asia 38.3 (2008): 353–372. Web.

Koo, Min Gyo. ‘Belling the Chinese Dragon at Sea: Western Theories and Asian Realities’. Ocean Development & International Law 48.1 (2017): 52–68. Web.

Kreuzer, Peter. ‘A Comparison of Malaysian and Philippine Responses to China in the South China Sea’. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9.3 (2016): 239–276. Web.

Kumar, A. Vinod and Cambridge Books Online EBS. India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: The Perennial Outlier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Web. <https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297319>.

Kurowska, Xymena. ‘Multipolarity as Resistance to Liberal Norms: Russia’s Position on Responsibility to Protect’. Conflict, Security & Development 14.4 (2014): 489–508. Web.

Ladwig, Walter C. ‘Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, "Look East,” and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific’. Asian Security 5.2 (2009): 87–113. Web.

---. ‘India and Military Power Projection: Will the Land of Gandhi Become a Conventional Great Power?’ Asian Survey 50.6 (2010): 1162–1183. Web.

Lee, Pak K., and Lai-Ha Chan. ‘China’s and India’s Perspectives on Military Intervention: Why Africa but Not Syria?’ Australian Journal of International Affairs 70.2 (2016): 179–214. Web.

---. ‘China’s and India’s Perspectives on Military Intervention: Why Africa but Not Syria?’ Australian Journal of International Affairs 70.2 (2016): 179–214. Web.

Legro, Jeffrey W. ‘What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power’. Perspectives on Politics 5.03 (2007): n. pag. Web.

Lewis, John W., and Xue Litai. ‘China’s Security Agenda Transcends the South China Sea’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72.4 (2016): 212–221. Web.

Liff, Adam P., and G. John Ikenberry. ‘Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma’. International Security 39.2 (2014): 52–91. Web.

Logan, Justin. ‘China, America, and the Pivot to Asia | Cato Institute’. N.p., 2013. Web. <https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/china-america-pivot-asia>.

M. Taylor Fravel. ‘Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes’. International Security 30.2 (2005): 46–83. Web. <http://0-muse.jhu.edu.wam.city.ac.uk/article/190698>.

Marco Antonio Vieira and Chris Alden. ‘India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership’. Global Governance 17.4 (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23104289?Search=yes&amp;resultItemClick=true&amp;searchText=%22india%2C+brazil+and+south+africa%22&amp;searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522india%252C%2Bbrazil%2Band%2Bsouth%2Bafrica%2522%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000814&amp;refreqid=search%3Afd8a0d48c16faddc1066d4c0d180c142&amp;seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents>.

Mark T. Berger. ‘After the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism’. Third World Quarterly 25.1 (2004): n. pag. Web. <https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993775?pq-origsite=summon&amp;seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents>.

McDougall, Derek. ‘Responsibility While Protecting’. Global Responsibility to Protect 6.1 (2014): 64–87. Web.

Mearsheimer, J. J. ‘The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia’. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3.4 (2010): 381–396. Web.

---. ‘The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia’. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3.4 (2010): 381–396. Web.

Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. ‘Still Under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in India’. India Review 8.3 (2009): 209–233. Web.

Merke, Federico. ‘Neither Balance nor Bandwagon: South American International Society Meets Brazil’s Rising Power’. International Politics 52.2 (2015): 178–192. Web.

Michaelowa, KatharinaMichaelowa, Axel. ‘India as an Emerging Power in International Climate Negotiations’. Climate Policy 12 (2012): 575–590. Web. <https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321407678?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=14510>.

Miller, Manjari Chatterjee. ‘The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers’. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9.2 (2016): 211–238. Web.

Miller, Manjari Chatterjee and ProQuest (Firm). Wronged by Empire: Post-Imperial Ideology and Foreign Policy in India and China. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2013. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=1319336>.

Miller, Manjari Chatterjee, and Kate Sullivan de Estrada. ‘Pragmatism in Indian Foreign Policy: How Ideas Constrain Modi’. International Affairs 93.1 (2017): 27–49. Web.

MORTON, KATHERINE. ‘China’s Ambition in the South China Sea: Is a Legitimate Maritime Order Possible?’ International Affairs 92.4 (2016): 909–940. Web.

Moshirzadeh, Homeira. ‘Discursive Foundations of Iran’s Nuclear Policy’. Security Dialogue 38.4 (2007): 521–543. Web.

MUKHERJEE, ROHAN, and DAVID M. MALONE. ‘Indian Foreign Policy and Contemporary Security Challenges’. International Affairs 87.1 (2011): 87–104. Web.

Müller, Harald. ‘Icons Off the Mark’. The Nonproliferation Review 20.3 (2013): 545–565. Web.

Narang, Vipin, and Paul Staniland. ‘Institutions and Worldviews in Indian Foreign Security Policy’. India Review 11.2 (2012): 76–94. Web.

NARLIKAR, AMRITA. ‘India Rising: Responsible to Whom?’ International Affairs 89.3 (2013): 595–614. Web.

Ogunnubi. ‘South Africa and the Question of Hegemony in Africa’. Journal of developing societies 33.4 (2017): n. pag. Print.

Oliveira, Gustavo de L. T. ‘The Geopolitics of Brazilian Soybeans’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43.2 (2016): 348–372. Web.

Ollapally, Deepa M. ‘Understanding Indian Policy Dilemmas in the Indo-Pacific through an India–US–China Maritime Triangle Lens’. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India 12.1 (2016): 1–12. Web.

Palit, Amitendu. ‘India’s Economic and Strategic Perceptions of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative’. Geopolitics 22.2 (2017): 292–309. Web.

Pan, Chengxin. ‘The “Indo-Pacific” and Geopolitical Anxieties about China’s Rise in the Asian Regional Order’. Australian Journal of International Affairs 68.4 (2014): 453–469. Web.

Pant, Harsh V. ‘INDIAN FOREIGN POLICY CHALLENGES: SUBSTANTIVE UNCERTAINTIES AND INSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES’. Asian Affairs 40.1 (2009): 90–101. Web.

Pant, Harsh V. and Cambridge Books Online EBS. The Rise of China: Implications for India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9788175969377/type/BOOK>.

PANT, HARSH V., and JULIE M. SUPER. ‘India’s “Non-Alignment” Conundrum: A Twentieth-Century Policy in a Changing World’. International Affairs 91.4 (2015): 747–764. Web.

Peng, Chengyi. ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective’. International Critical Thought 7.2 (2017): 267–278. Web.

Prashad, V. ‘NEOLIBERALISM WITH SOUTHERN CHARACTERISTICS - The Rise of the BRICS’. N.p., 2013. Web. <http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/neoliberalism-with-southern-characteristics/>.

Pretorius, Joelien, and Tom Sauer. ‘The Nuclear Security Discourse: Proliferation vs Disarmament Concerns’. South African Journal of International Affairs 21.3 (2014): 321–334. Web.

---. ‘The Nuclear Security Discourse: Proliferation vs Disarmament Concerns’. South African Journal of International Affairs 21.3 (2014): 321–334. Web.

Raine, Sarah. ‘Beijing’s South China Sea Debate’. Survival 53.5 (2011): 69–88. Web.

Robinson, William I. ‘The Transnational State and the BRICS: A Global Capitalism Perspective’. Third World Quarterly 36.1 (2015): 1–21. Web.

Rodrigues Vieira, Vinícius. ‘Beyond the Market: The Global South and the WTO’s Normative Dimension’. International Negotiation 21.2 (2016): 267–294. Web.

Rohan Mukherjee and David M. Malone. ‘From High Ground to High Table: The Evolution of Indian Multilateralism’. Global Governance 17.3 (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/23033750>.

Romanova, Tatiana. ‘Is Russian Energy Policy towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package’. Geopolitics 21.4 (2016): 857–879. Web.

SAKWA, RICHARD. ‘“New Cold War” or Twenty Years’ Crisis? Russia and International Politics’. International Affairs 84.2 (2008): 241–267. Web.

Sakwa, Richard. ‘The Problem of “the International” in Russian Identity Formation’. International Politics 49.4 (2012): 449–465. Web.

Sakwa, Richard and Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Russia against the Rest: The Post-Cold War Crisis of World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675885>.

Schoeman, Prof Maxi. ‘South Africa as an Emerging Middle Power’. African Security Review 9.3 (2000): 47–58. Web.

Scott, David. ‘India’s "Extended Neighborhood” Concept: Power Projection for a Rising Power’. India Review 8.2 (2009): 107–143. Web.

---. ‘India’s Role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in Play’. India Review 12.2 (2013): 51–69. Web.

---. ‘The Great Power “Great Game” between India and China: “The Logic of Geography”’. Geopolitics 13.1 (2008): 1–26. Web.

Scott Sagan, Kenneth Waltz and Richard K. Betts. ‘A NUCLEAR IRAN: PROMOTING STABILITY OR COURTING DISASTER?’ Journal of International Affairs 60.2 (2007): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357975>.

Sebastian Job. ‘Globalising Russia? The Neoliberal/Nationalist Two-Step and the Russification of the West’. Third World Quarterly 22.6 (2001): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993455>.

Shambaugh, David. ‘Coping with a Conflicted China’. The Washington Quarterly 34.1 (2011): 7–27. Web.

Sharma, Shalendra D. and Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. China and India in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609916>.

Shaun Breslin. ‘Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 85.4 (2009): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695092>.

SHIMAZU, NAOKO. ‘Diplomacy As Theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955’. Modern Asian Studies 48 225–252. Web. <https://0-search-proquest-com.wam.city.ac.uk/docview/1469760013?pq-origsite=summon>.

Sornarajah, M., Jiangyu Wang, and Cambridge Books Online EBS. China, India and the International Economic Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Web. <http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511760235>.

Sotero, Paulo. ‘Brazil’s Rising Ambition in a Shifting Global Balance of Power’. Politics 30.1_suppl (2010): 71–81. Web.

Stuenkel, Oliver, and Marcos Tourinho. ‘Regulating Intervention: Brazil and the Responsibility to Protect’. Conflict, Security & Development 14.4 (2014): 379–402. Web.

Summers, Tim. ‘China’s “New Silk Roads”: Sub-National Regions and Networks of Global Political Economy’. Third World Quarterly 37.9 (2016): 1628–1643. Web.

Suzuki, Shogo. ‘Why Does China Participate in Intrusive Peacekeeping? Understanding Paternalistic Chinese Discourses on Development and Intervention’. International Peacekeeping 18.3 (2011): 271–285. Web.

‘The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications’. n. pag. Web. <https://hz7fp2gl5k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE+NINE-DASH+LINE+IN+THE+SOUTH+CHINA+SEA%3A+HISTORY%2C+STATUS%2C+AND+IMPLICATIONS&rft.jtitle=AMERICAN+JOURNAL+OF+INTERNATIONAL+LAW&rft.au=Gao%2C+ZG&rft.au=Jia%2C+BB&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.pub=AMER+SOC+INT+LAW&rft.issn=0002-9300&rft.eissn=2161-7953&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000316626600004&paramdict=en-UK>.

Turner, Oliver. ‘China, India and the US Rebalance to the Asia Pacific: The Geopolitics of Rising Identities’. Geopolitics 21.4 (2016): 922–944. Web.

van der Westhuizen, Janis. ‘Brazil and South Africa: The “Odd Couple” of the South Atlantic?’ Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 54.2 (2016): 232–251. Web.

Verhoeven, Harry, C.S.R. Murthy, and Ricardo Soares de Oliveira. ‘“Our Identity Is Our Currency”: South Africa, the Responsibility to Protect and the Logic of African Intervention’. Conflict, Security & Development 14.4 (2014): 509–534. Web.

Vincent Wei-cheng Wang. ‘“Chindia” or Rivalry? Rising China, Rising India, and Contending Perspectives on India-China Relations’. Asian Perspective 35.3 (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704764>.

Weber, Cynthia. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. Fourth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014. Print.

---. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. Fourth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014. Print.

Weber, Cynthia and Taylor & Francis. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2014. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&amp;redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291>.

---. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2014. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&amp;redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291>.

Xiaoyu, P. ‘Socialisation as a Two-Way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms’. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5.4 (2012): 341–367. Web.

---. ‘Socialisation as a Two-Way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms’. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5.4 (2012): 341–367. Web.

Yahuda, Michael. ‘China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea’. Journal of Contemporary China 22.81 (2013): 446–459. Web.

Zhang (张 锋), Feng. ‘Assessing China’s Response to the South China Sea Arbitration Ruling’. Australian Journal of International Affairs 71.4 (2017): 440–459. Web.