1.
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs. 2011;90(3):56-68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
2.
Mearsheimer JJ. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2010;3(4):381-396. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq016
3.
Robinson WI. The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective. Third World Quarterly. 2015;36(1):1-21. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.976012
4.
Weber C, Taylor & Francis. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. 4th ed. Routledge; 2014. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
5.
Weber C. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. Fourth edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
6.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
7.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
8.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
9.
Enloe C, JSTOR. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. 2nd ed. University of California Press; 2014. http://0-www.jstor.org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
10.
Acharya A. Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011;39(3):619-637. doi:10.1177/0305829811406574
11.
Anghie, A. Civilization and Commerce: The Concept of Governance in Historical Perspective. Villanova Law Review. Published 2000. https://0-heinonline-org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/vllalr45&div=51&start_page=887&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
12.
Weber C, Taylor & Francis. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. 4th ed. Routledge; 2014. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
13.
Weber C. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. Fourth edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
14.
Barnett M, Duvall R. Power in International Politics. International Organization. 2005;59(01). doi:10.1017/S0020818305050010
15.
Hobson JM, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press; 2012. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
16.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
17.
Prashad V. NEOLIBERALISM WITH SOUTHERN CHARACTERISTICS - The rise of the BRICS. Published 2013. http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/neoliberalism-with-southern-characteristics/
18.
Hopewell K. The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance. International Affairs. 2017;93(6):1377-1396. doi:10.1093/ia/iix192
19.
SHIMAZU, NAOKO. Diplomacy As Theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies. 48:225-252. https://0-search-proquest-com.wam.city.ac.uk/docview/1469760013?pq-origsite=summon
20.
Cambridge Books Online EBS. Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. (Eslava L, Fakhri M, Nesiah V, eds.). Cambridge University Press; 2017. http://0-doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/9781316414880
21.
Rodrigues Vieira V. Beyond the Market: The Global South and the WTO’s Normative Dimension. International Negotiation. 2016;21(2):267-294. doi:10.1163/15718069-12341333
22.
Keukeleire S, Hooijmaaijers B. The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2014;52(3):582-599. doi:10.1111/jcms.12102
23.
Xiaoyu P. Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2012;5(4):341-367. doi:10.1093/cjip/pos017
24.
Mark T. Berger. After the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism. Third World Quarterly. 2004;25(1). https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993775?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
25.
Hameiri S, Jones L. Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China. European Journal of International Relations. 2016;22(1):72-98. doi:10.1177/1354066115578952
26.
Miller MC. The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2016;9(2):211-238. doi:10.1093/cjip/pow006
27.
Mearsheimer JJ. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2010;3(4):381-396. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq016
28.
Lee PK, Chan LH. China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2016;70(2):179-214. doi:10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968
29.
Miller MC, ProQuest (Firm). Wronged by Empire: Post-Imperial Ideology and Foreign Policy in India and China. Stanford University Press; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=1319336
30.
Dreyer JT. The ‘Tianxia Trope’: will China change the international system? Journal of Contemporary China. 2015;24(96):1015-1031. doi:10.1080/10670564.2015.1030951
31.
Shaun Breslin. Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 2009;85(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695092
32.
Callahan WA. Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review. 2008;10(4):749-761. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00830.x
33.
Ferchen M. Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus. Review of International Political Economy. 2013;20(2):390-420. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660184
34.
Suzuki S. Why Does China Participate in Intrusive Peacekeeping? Understanding Paternalistic Chinese Discourses on Development and Intervention. International Peacekeeping. 2011;18(3):271-285. doi:10.1080/13533312.2011.563079
35.
Kiely R. "Poverty’s Fall”/China’s Rise: Global Convergence or New Forms of Uneven Development? Journal of Contemporary Asia. 2008;38(3):353-372. doi:10.1080/00472330802078451
36.
Legro JW. What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power. Perspectives on Politics. 2007;5(03). doi:10.1017/S1537592707071526
37.
Logan J. China, America, and the Pivot to Asia | Cato Institute. Published 2013. https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/china-america-pivot-asia
38.
Shambaugh D. Coping with a Conflicted China. The Washington Quarterly. 2011;34(1):7-27. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2011.537974
39.
Summers T. China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy. Third World Quarterly. 2016;37(9):1628-1643. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415
40.
Xiaoyu P. Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2012;5(4):341-367. doi:10.1093/cjip/pos017
41.
Miller MC, Sullivan de Estrada K. Pragmatism in Indian foreign policy: how ideas constrain Modi. International Affairs. 2017;93(1):27-49. doi:10.1093/ia/iiw001
42.
NARLIKAR A. India rising: responsible to whom? International Affairs. 2013;89(3):595-614. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12035
43.
IAN TAYLOR. India’s rise in Africa. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 2012;88(4). https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23255618?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=India%27s&searchText=rise&searchText=in&searchText=Africa&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2BIndia%2527s%2Brise%2Bin%2BAfrica%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100185&ab_segments=0%2Ftbsub-1%2Frelevance_config_with_tbsub&refreqid=search%3Acaf5d9907d63af2a8f7187028a7febf8&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
44.
Foot R, Gaddis JL, Hurrell A, ebrary, Inc, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science. Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford University Press; 2003. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F3738
45.
Bloomfield A. India and the Libyan Crisis: Flirting with the Responsibility to Protect, Retreating to the Sovereignty Norm. Contemporary Security Policy. 2015;36(1):27-55. doi:10.1080/13523260.2015.1012347
46.
Chiriyankandath J. Realigning India: Indian foreign policy after the Cold War. The Round Table. 2004;93(374):199-211. doi:10.1080/00358530410001679567
47.
Ganguly S, Pardesi MS. Explaining Sixty Years of India’s Foreign Policy. India Review. 2009;8(1):4-19. doi:10.1080/14736480802665162
48.
Kampani G. New Delhi’s Long Nuclear Journey. International Security. 2014;38(4):79-114. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00158
49.
Andrew B. Kennedy. India’s Nuclear Odyssey: Implicit Umbrellas, Diplomatic Disappointments, and the Bomb. International Security. 2011;36(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289700
50.
Ladwig WC. Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, "Look East,” and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific. Asian Security. 2009;5(2):87-113. doi:10.1080/14799850902886476
51.
Ladwig WC. India and Military Power Projection: Will the Land of Gandhi Become a Conventional Great Power? Asian Survey. 2010;50(6):1162-1183. doi:10.1525/as.2010.50.6.1162
52.
Mehta PB. Still Under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in India. India Review. 2009;8(3):209-233. doi:10.1080/14736480903116750
53.
Michaelowa, KatharinaMichaelowa, Axel. India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy. 2012;12:575-590. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321407678?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=14510
54.
Chatterjee Miller M. The Un-Argumentative Indian?: Ideas About the Rise of India and Their Interaction With Domestic Structures. India Review. 2014;13(1):1-14. doi:10.1080/14736489.2014.873670
55.
MUKHERJEE R, MALONE DM. Indian foreign policy and contemporary security challenges. International Affairs. 2011;87(1):87-104. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00961.x
56.
Rohan Mukherjee and David M. Malone. From High Ground to High Table: The Evolution of Indian Multilateralism. Global Governance. 2011;17(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23033750
57.
Amrita Narlikar. All That Glitters Is Not Gold: India’s Rise to Power. Third World Quarterly. 2007;28(5). https://www.jstor.org/stable/20454975
58.
Narang V, Staniland P. Institutions and Worldviews in Indian Foreign Security Policy. India Review. 2012;11(2):76-94. doi:10.1080/14736489.2012.674818
59.
PANT HV, SUPER JM. India’s ‘non-alignment’ conundrum: a twentieth-century policy in a changing world. International Affairs. 2015;91(4):747-764. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12336
60.
Pant HV. INDIAN FOREIGN POLICY CHALLENGES: SUBSTANTIVE UNCERTAINTIES AND INSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES. Asian Affairs. 2009;40(1):90-101. doi:10.1080/03068370802658724
61.
Scott D. India’s "Extended Neighborhood” Concept: Power Projection for a Rising Power. India Review. 2009;8(2):107-143. doi:10.1080/14736480902901038
62.
Vincent Wei-cheng Wang. ‘Chindia’ or Rivalry? Rising China, Rising India, and Contending Perspectives on India-China Relations. Asian Perspective. 2011;35(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704764
63.
Scott D. The Great Power ‘Great Game’ between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography’. Geopolitics. 2008;13(1):1-26. doi:10.1080/14650040701783243
64.
Pan C. The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the Asian regional order. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2014;68(4):453-469. doi:10.1080/10357718.2014.884054
65.
Kampani G. From existential to minimum deterrence: Explaining India’s decision to test. The Nonproliferation Review. 1998;6(1):12-24. doi:10.1080/10736709808436732
66.
Ollapally DM. Understanding Indian policy dilemmas in the Indo-Pacific through an India–US–China maritime triangle lens. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India. 2016;12(1):1-12. doi:10.1080/09733159.2016.1181392
67.
Sornarajah M, Wang J, Cambridge Books Online EBS. China, India and the International Economic Order. Cambridge University Press; 2010. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511760235
68.
Brewster D. Beyond the ‘String of Pearls’: is there really a Sino-Indian security dilemma in the Indian Ocean? Journal of the Indian Ocean Region. 2014;10(2):133-149. doi:10.1080/19480881.2014.922350
69.
Palit A. India’s Economic and Strategic Perceptions of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics. 2017;22(2):292-309. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1274305
70.
Pant HV, Cambridge Books Online EBS. The Rise of China: Implications for India. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9788175969377/type/BOOK
71.
Sharma SD, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. China and India in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge University Press; 2009. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609916
72.
Brewster D. Indian Strategic Thinking about East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies. 2011;34(6):825-852. doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.627155
73.
Blanchard JMF, Flint C. The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics. 2017;22(2):223-245. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503
74.
Lee PK, Chan LH. China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2016;70(2):179-214. doi:10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968
75.
Turner O. China, India and the US Rebalance to the Asia Pacific: The Geopolitics of Rising Identities. Geopolitics. 2016;21(4):922-944. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1190708
76.
Guihong Z. US-India Strategic Partnership. International Studies. 2005;42(3-4):277-293. doi:10.1177/002088170504200306
77.
Abdenur AE, Folly M, Moura K, Jordão SAS, Maia P. The BRICS and the South Atlantic: Emerging arena for South–South cooperation. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2014;21(3):303-319. doi:10.1080/10220461.2014.972442
78.
van der Westhuizen J. Brazil and South Africa: the ‘odd couple’ of the South Atlantic? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 2016;54(2):232-251. doi:10.1080/14662043.2016.1151169
79.
Merke F. Neither balance nor bandwagon: South American international society meets Brazil’s rising power. International Politics. 2015;52(2):178-192. doi:10.1057/ip.2014.49
80.
Ogunnubi. South Africa and the Question of Hegemony in Africa. Journal of developing societies. 2017;33(4).
81.
Marco Antonio Vieira and Chris Alden. India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership. Global Governance. 2011;17(4). https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23104289?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22india%2C+brazil+and+south+africa%22&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522india%252C%2Bbrazil%2Band%2Bsouth%2Bafrica%2522%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000814&refreqid=search%3Afd8a0d48c16faddc1066d4c0d180c142&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
82.
Jordaan E. Rising Powers and Human Rights: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum at the UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Human Rights. 2015;14(4):463-485. doi:10.1080/14754835.2014.988784
83.
Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira. The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism. Third World Quarterly. 2005;26(7). https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/4017805?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
84.
Carranza ME. Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis. Published online June 2014:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/fpa.12065
85.
McDougall D. Responsibility While Protecting. Global Responsibility to Protect. 2014;6(1):64-87. doi:10.1163/1875984X-00601004
86.
Stuenkel O, Tourinho M. Regulating intervention: Brazil and the responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development. 2014;14(4):379-402. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.930593
87.
Abdenur AE. Rising powers in stormy seas: Brazil and the UNIFIL maritime task force. International Peacekeeping. 2016;23(3):389-415. doi:10.1080/13533312.2016.1155413
88.
Dauvergne P, BL Farias D. The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power. Third World Quarterly. 2012;33(5):903-917. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.674704
89.
de Freitas Barbosa A, Narciso T, Biancalana M. Brazil in Africa: Another Emerging Power in the Continent? Politikon. 2009;36(1):59-86. doi:10.1080/02589340903155401
90.
Andrés Malamud. A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy. Latin American Politics and Society. 2011;53(3). https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/41342327?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
91.
Oliveira G de LT. The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 2016;43(2):348-372. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.992337
92.
Sotero P. Brazil’s Rising Ambition in a Shifting Global Balance of Power. Politics. 2010;30(1_suppl):71-81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01394.x
93.
Cunliffe P, Kenkel KM, eds. Brazil as a Rising Power: Intervention Norms and the Contestation of Global Order. Vol 113. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2016.
94.
Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future. (Paul TV, ed.). Cambridge University Press; 2016. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781316460191
95.
Chatin M. Brazil: analysis of a rising soft power. Journal of Political Power. 2016;9(3):369-393. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232286
96.
ALDEN C, SCHOEMAN M. South Africa in the company of giants: the search for leadership in a transforming global order. International Affairs. 2013;89(1):111-129. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12007
97.
Alden C, Soko M. South Africa’s economic relations with Africa: hegemony and its discontents. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 2005;43(3):367-392. doi:10.1017/S0022278X05001011
98.
Alden C, Schoeman M. South Africa’s symbolic hegemony in Africa. International Politics. 2015;52(2):239-254. doi:10.1057/ip.2014.47
99.
Bond P. Sub-imperialism as Lubricant of Neoliberalism: South African ‘deputy sheriff’ duty within. Third World Quarterly. 2013;34(2):251-270. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.775783
100.
Hornsby DJ, Black DR. Breaking with tradition? South Africa–UK relations. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 2016;54(2):268-286. doi:10.1080/14662043.2016.1151167
101.
Pretorius J, Sauer T. The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2014;21(3):321-334. doi:10.1080/10220461.2014.965273
102.
Verhoeven H, Murthy CSR, Soares de Oliveira R. ‘Our identity is our currency’: South Africa, the responsibility to protect and the logic of African intervention. Conflict, Security & Development. 2014;14(4):509-534. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.930594
103.
Beresford A. A responsibility to protect Africa from the West? South Africa and the NATO intervention in Libya. International Politics. 2015;52(3):288-304. doi:10.1057/ip.2015.11
104.
Habib A. South Africa’s foreign policy: hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2009;16(2):143-159. doi:10.1080/10220460903265857
105.
Janis Van Der Westhuizen. South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power. Third World Quarterly. 1998;19(3). https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993132?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
106.
Schoeman PM. South Africa as an emerging middle power. African Security Review. 2000;9(3):47-58. doi:10.1080/10246029.2000.9628050
107.
John J. Mearsheimer. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs. 2014;93(5). https://www.jstor.org/stable/24483306
108.
Alexander J. Motyl. THE SURREALISM OF REALISM: Misreading the War in Ukraine. World Affairs. 2015;177(5). https://www.jstor.org/stable/43555427
109.
SAKWA R. ‘New Cold War’ or twenty years’ crisis? Russia and international politics. International Affairs. 2008;84(2):241-267. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00702.x
110.
Derek Averre. From Pristina to Tskhinvali: The Legacy of Operation Allied Force in Russia’s Relations with the West. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 2009;85(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695032
111.
Cooley A. Chapter 1: Russia and the Recent Evolution of the SCO: Issues and Challenges for U.S. Policy - American Academy of Arts & Sciences. https://www.amacad.org/content/publications/pubContent.aspx?d=1135
112.
Forsberg T, Herd G. Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015;23(1):41-57. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.1001824
113.
Haukkala H. From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015;23(1):25-40. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822
114.
Hughes J. Russia and the Secession of Kosovo: Power, Norms and the Failure of Multilateralism. Europe-Asia Studies. 2013;65(5):992-1016. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.792448
115.
Howorth J. ‘Stability on the Borders’: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2017;55(1):121-136. doi:10.1111/jcms.12448
116.
Sebastian Job. Globalising Russia? The Neoliberal/Nationalist Two-Step and the Russification of the West. Third World Quarterly. 2001;22(6). https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993455
117.
Kurowska X. Multipolarity as resistance to liberal norms: Russia’s position on responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development. 2014;14(4):489-508. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.930589
118.
Peng C. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective. International Critical Thought. 2017;7(2):267-278. doi:10.1080/21598282.2017.1316436
119.
Romanova T. Is Russian Energy Policy towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package. Geopolitics. 2016;21(4):857-879. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1155049
120.
Sakwa R. The problem of ‘the international’ in Russian identity formation. International Politics. 2012;49(4):449-465. doi:10.1057/ip.2012.10
121.
Sakwa R, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Russia against the Rest: The Post-Cold War Crisis of World Order. Cambridge University Press; 2017. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675885
122.
Hugh Gusterson. Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. Cultural Anthropology. 1999;14(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/656531
123.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs. 2012;91(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
124.
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N. Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs. 91:157-162. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
125.
Pretorius J, Sauer T. The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2014;21(3):321-334. doi:10.1080/10220461.2014.965273
126.
Gusterson H. Paranoid, Potbellied Stalinist Gets Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review. 2008;15(1):21-42. doi:10.1080/10736700701852894
127.
Scott Sagan, Kenneth Waltz and Richard K. Betts. A NUCLEAR IRAN: PROMOTING STABILITY OR COURTING DISASTER? Journal of International Affairs. 2007;60(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357975
128.
Moshirzadeh H. Discursive Foundations of Iran’s Nuclear Policy. Security Dialogue. 2007;38(4):521-543. doi:10.1177/0967010607084999
129.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs. 2012;91(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
130.
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N. Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs. 91:157-162. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
131.
Müller H. Icons Off the Mark. The Nonproliferation Review. 2013;20(3):545-565. doi:10.1080/10736700.2013.849911
132.
Kumar AV, Cambridge Books Online EBS. India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: The Perennial Outlier. Cambridge University Press; 2014. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297319
133.
Buszynski L. The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry. The Washington Quarterly. 2012;35(2):139-156. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2012.666495
134.
M. Taylor Fravel. Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes. International Security. 2005;30(2):46-83. http://0-muse.jhu.edu.wam.city.ac.uk/article/190698
135.
The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status, and implications. https://hz7fp2gl5k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE+NINE-DASH+LINE+IN+THE+SOUTH+CHINA+SEA%3A+HISTORY%2C+STATUS%2C+AND+IMPLICATIONS&rft.jtitle=AMERICAN+JOURNAL+OF+INTERNATIONAL+LAW&rft.au=Gao%2C+ZG&rft.au=Jia%2C+BB&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.pub=AMER+SOC+INT+LAW&rft.issn=0002-9300&rft.eissn=2161-7953&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000316626600004¶mdict=en-UK
136.
Koo MG. Belling the Chinese Dragon at Sea: Western Theories and Asian Realities. Ocean Development & International Law. 2017;48(1):52-68. doi:10.1080/00908320.2017.1265365
137.
Jerden B. The Assertive China Narrative: Why It Is Wrong and How So Many Still Bought into It. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2014;7(1):47-88. doi:10.1093/cjip/pot019
138.
Kreuzer P. A Comparison of Malaysian and Philippine Responses to China in the South China Sea. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2016;9(3):239-276. doi:10.1093/cjip/pow008
139.
Lewis JW, Litai X. China’s security agenda transcends the South China Sea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2016;72(4):212-221. doi:10.1080/00963402.2016.1194056
140.
Liff AP, Ikenberry GJ. Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security. 2014;39(2):52-91. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00176
141.
MORTON K. China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible? International Affairs. 2016;92(4):909-940. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12658
142.
Raine S. Beijing’s South China Sea Debate. Survival. 2011;53(5):69-88. doi:10.1080/00396338.2011.621633
143.
Scott D. India’s Role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in Play. India Review. 2013;12(2):51-69. doi:10.1080/14736489.2013.786965
144.
Yahuda M. China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Journal of Contemporary China. 2013;22(81):446-459. doi:10.1080/10670564.2012.748964
145.
Zhang (张 锋) F. Assessing China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2017;71(4):440-459. doi:10.1080/10357718.2017.1287876
