1
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs 2011;90:56–68.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
2
Mearsheimer JJ. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2010;3:381–96. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq016
3
Robinson WI. The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective. Third World Quarterly 2015;36:1–21. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.976012
4
Weber C, Taylor & Francis. International relations theory: a critical introduction. 4th ed. London: : Routledge 2014. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
5
Weber C. International relations theory: a critical introduction. Fourth edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2014.
6
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
7
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
8
Burchill S, Linklater A. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
9
Enloe C, JSTOR. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. 2nd ed. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2014. http://0-www.jstor.org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
10
Acharya A. Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2011;39:619–37. doi:10.1177/0305829811406574
11
Anghie, A. Civilization and Commerce: The Concept of Governance in Historical Perspective. Villanova Law Review. 2000.https://0-heinonline-org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/vllalr45&div=51&start_page=887&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
12
Weber C, Taylor & Francis. International relations theory: a critical introduction. 4th ed. London: : Routledge 2014. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315882291
13
Weber C. International relations theory: a critical introduction. Fourth edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2014.
14
Barnett M, Duvall R. Power in International Politics. International Organization 2005;59. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050010
15
Hobson JM, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
16
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
17
Prashad V. NEOLIBERALISM WITH SOUTHERN CHARACTERISTICS - The rise of the BRICS. 2013.http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/neoliberalism-with-southern-characteristics/
18
Hopewell K. The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance. International Affairs 2017;93:1377–96. doi:10.1093/ia/iix192
19
SHIMAZU, NAOKO. Diplomacy As Theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies;48:225–52.https://0-search-proquest-com.wam.city.ac.uk/docview/1469760013?pq-origsite=summon
20
Cambridge Books Online EBS. Bandung, global history, and international law: critical pasts and pending futures. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2017. http://0-doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/9781316414880
21
Rodrigues Vieira V. Beyond the Market: The Global South and the WTO’s Normative Dimension. International Negotiation 2016;21:267–94. doi:10.1163/15718069-12341333
22
Keukeleire S, Hooijmaaijers B. The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 2014;52:582–99. doi:10.1111/jcms.12102
23
Xiaoyu P. Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2012;5:341–67. doi:10.1093/cjip/pos017
24
Mark T. Berger. After the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism. Third World Quarterly 2004;25.https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993775?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
25
Hameiri S, Jones L. Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China. European Journal of International Relations 2016;22:72–98. doi:10.1177/1354066115578952
26
Miller MC. The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2016;9:211–38. doi:10.1093/cjip/pow006
27
Mearsheimer JJ. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2010;3:381–96. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq016
28
Lee PK, Chan L-H. China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs 2016;70:179–214. doi:10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968
29
Miller MC, ProQuest (Firm). Wronged by empire: post-imperial ideology and foreign policy in India and China. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=1319336
30
Dreyer JT. The ‘Tianxia Trope’: will China change the international system? Journal of Contemporary China 2015;24:1015–31. doi:10.1080/10670564.2015.1030951
31
Shaun Breslin. Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 2009;85.https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695092
32
Callahan WA. Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review 2008;10:749–61. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00830.x
33
Ferchen M. Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus. Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:390–420. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660184
34
Suzuki S. Why Does China Participate in Intrusive Peacekeeping? Understanding Paternalistic Chinese Discourses on Development and Intervention. International Peacekeeping 2011;18:271–85. doi:10.1080/13533312.2011.563079
35
Kiely R. "Poverty’s Fall”/China’s Rise: Global Convergence or New Forms of Uneven Development? Journal of Contemporary Asia 2008;38:353–72. doi:10.1080/00472330802078451
36
Legro JW. What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power. Perspectives on Politics 2007;5. doi:10.1017/S1537592707071526
37
Logan J. China, America, and the Pivot to Asia | Cato Institute. 2013.https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/china-america-pivot-asia
38
Shambaugh D. Coping with a Conflicted China. The Washington Quarterly 2011;34:7–27. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2011.537974
39
Summers T. China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy. Third World Quarterly 2016;37:1628–43. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415
40
Xiaoyu P. Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2012;5:341–67. doi:10.1093/cjip/pos017
41
Miller MC, Sullivan de Estrada K. Pragmatism in Indian foreign policy: how ideas constrain Modi. International Affairs 2017;93:27–49. doi:10.1093/ia/iiw001
42
NARLIKAR A. India rising: responsible to whom? International Affairs 2013;89:595–614. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12035
43
IAN TAYLOR. India’s rise in Africa. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 2012;88.https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23255618?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=India%27s&searchText=rise&searchText=in&searchText=Africa&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2BIndia%2527s%2Brise%2Bin%2BAfrica%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100185&ab_segments=0%2Ftbsub-1%2Frelevance_config_with_tbsub&refreqid=search%3Acaf5d9907d63af2a8f7187028a7febf8&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
44
Foot R, Gaddis JL, Hurrell A, et al. Order and justice in international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F3738
45
Bloomfield A. India and the Libyan Crisis: Flirting with the Responsibility to Protect, Retreating to the Sovereignty Norm. Contemporary Security Policy 2015;36:27–55. doi:10.1080/13523260.2015.1012347
46
Chiriyankandath J. Realigning India: Indian foreign policy after the Cold War. The Round Table 2004;93:199–211. doi:10.1080/00358530410001679567
47
Ganguly S, Pardesi MS. Explaining Sixty Years of India’s Foreign Policy. India Review 2009;8:4–19. doi:10.1080/14736480802665162
48
Kampani G. New Delhi’s Long Nuclear Journey. International Security 2014;38:79–114. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00158
49
Andrew B. Kennedy. India’s Nuclear Odyssey: Implicit Umbrellas, Diplomatic Disappointments, and the Bomb. International Security 2011;36.https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289700
50
Ladwig WC. Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, "Look East,” and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific. Asian Security 2009;5:87–113. doi:10.1080/14799850902886476
51
Ladwig WC. India and Military Power Projection: Will the Land of Gandhi Become a Conventional Great Power? Asian Survey 2010;50:1162–83. doi:10.1525/as.2010.50.6.1162
52
Mehta PB. Still Under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in India. India Review 2009;8:209–33. doi:10.1080/14736480903116750
53
Michaelowa, KatharinaMichaelowa, Axel. India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy 2012;12:575–90.https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321407678?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=14510
54
Chatterjee Miller M. The Un-Argumentative Indian?: Ideas About the Rise of India and Their Interaction With Domestic Structures. India Review 2014;13:1–14. doi:10.1080/14736489.2014.873670
55
MUKHERJEE R, MALONE DM. Indian foreign policy and contemporary security challenges. International Affairs 2011;87:87–104. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00961.x
56
Rohan Mukherjee and David M. Malone. From High Ground to High Table: The Evolution of Indian Multilateralism. Global Governance 2011;17.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23033750
57
Amrita Narlikar. All That Glitters Is Not Gold: India’s Rise to Power. Third World Quarterly 2007;28.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20454975
58
Narang V, Staniland P. Institutions and Worldviews in Indian Foreign Security Policy. India Review 2012;11:76–94. doi:10.1080/14736489.2012.674818
59
PANT HV, SUPER JM. India’s ‘non-alignment’ conundrum: a twentieth-century policy in a changing world. International Affairs 2015;91:747–64. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12336
60
Pant HV. INDIAN FOREIGN POLICY CHALLENGES: SUBSTANTIVE UNCERTAINTIES AND INSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES. Asian Affairs 2009;40:90–101. doi:10.1080/03068370802658724
61
Scott D. India’s "Extended Neighborhood” Concept: Power Projection for a Rising Power. India Review 2009;8:107–43. doi:10.1080/14736480902901038
62
Vincent Wei-cheng Wang. ‘Chindia’ or Rivalry? Rising China, Rising India, and Contending Perspectives on India-China Relations. Asian Perspective 2011;35.https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704764
63
Scott D. The Great Power ‘Great Game’ between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography’. Geopolitics 2008;13:1–26. doi:10.1080/14650040701783243
64
Pan C. The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the Asian regional order. Australian Journal of International Affairs 2014;68:453–69. doi:10.1080/10357718.2014.884054
65
Kampani G. From existential to minimum deterrence: Explaining India’s decision to test. The Nonproliferation Review 1998;6:12–24. doi:10.1080/10736709808436732
66
Ollapally DM. Understanding Indian policy dilemmas in the Indo-Pacific through an India–US–China maritime triangle lens. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India 2016;12:1–12. doi:10.1080/09733159.2016.1181392
67
Sornarajah M, Wang J, Cambridge Books Online EBS. China, India and the International Economic Order. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511760235
68
Brewster D. Beyond the ‘String of Pearls’: is there really a Sino-Indian security dilemma in the Indian Ocean? Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 2014;10:133–49. doi:10.1080/19480881.2014.922350
69
Palit A. India’s Economic and Strategic Perceptions of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics 2017;22:292–309. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1274305
70
Pant HV, Cambridge Books Online EBS. The Rise of China: Implications for India. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9788175969377/type/BOOK
71
Sharma SD, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. China and India in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609916
72
Brewster D. Indian Strategic Thinking about East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies 2011;34:825–52. doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.627155
73
Blanchard J-MF, Flint C. The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics 2017;22:223–45. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503
74
Lee PK, Chan L-H. China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs 2016;70:179–214. doi:10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968
75
Turner O. China, India and the US Rebalance to the Asia Pacific: The Geopolitics of Rising Identities. Geopolitics 2016;21:922–44. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1190708
76
Guihong Z. US-India Strategic Partnership. International Studies 2005;42:277–93. doi:10.1177/002088170504200306
77
Abdenur AE, Folly M, Moura K, et al. The BRICS and the South Atlantic: Emerging arena for South–South cooperation. South African Journal of International Affairs 2014;21:303–19. doi:10.1080/10220461.2014.972442
78
van der Westhuizen J. Brazil and South Africa: the ‘odd couple’ of the South Atlantic? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 2016;54:232–51. doi:10.1080/14662043.2016.1151169
79
Merke F. Neither balance nor bandwagon: South American international society meets Brazil’s rising power. International Politics 2015;52:178–92. doi:10.1057/ip.2014.49
80
Ogunnubi. South Africa and the Question of Hegemony in Africa. Journal of developing societies 2017;33.
81
Marco Antonio Vieira and Chris Alden. India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership. Global Governance 2011;17.https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/23104289?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22india%2C+brazil+and+south+africa%22&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522india%252C%2Bbrazil%2Band%2Bsouth%2Bafrica%2522%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000814&refreqid=search%3Afd8a0d48c16faddc1066d4c0d180c142&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
82
Jordaan E. Rising Powers and Human Rights: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum at the UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Human Rights 2015;14:463–85. doi:10.1080/14754835.2014.988784
83
Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira. The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism. Third World Quarterly 2005;26.https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/4017805?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
84
Carranza ME. Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis 2014;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/fpa.12065
85
McDougall D. Responsibility While Protecting. Global Responsibility to Protect 2014;6:64–87. doi:10.1163/1875984X-00601004
86
Stuenkel O, Tourinho M. Regulating intervention: Brazil and the responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development 2014;14:379–402. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.930593
87
Abdenur AE. Rising powers in stormy seas: Brazil and the UNIFIL maritime task force. International Peacekeeping 2016;23:389–415. doi:10.1080/13533312.2016.1155413
88
Dauvergne P, BL Farias D. The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power. Third World Quarterly 2012;33:903–17. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.674704
89
de Freitas Barbosa A, Narciso T, Biancalana M. Brazil in Africa: Another Emerging Power in the Continent? Politikon 2009;36:59–86. doi:10.1080/02589340903155401
90
Andrés Malamud. A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy. Latin American Politics and Society 2011;53.https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/41342327?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
91
Oliveira G de LT. The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans. The Journal of Peasant Studies 2016;43:348–72. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.992337
92
Sotero P. Brazil’s Rising Ambition in a Shifting Global Balance of Power. Politics 2010;30:71–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01394.x
93
Cunliffe P, Kenkel KM, editors. Brazil as a rising power: intervention norms and the contestation of global order. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2016.
94
Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2016. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781316460191
95
Chatin M. Brazil: analysis of a rising soft power. Journal of Political Power 2016;9:369–93. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232286
96
ALDEN C, SCHOEMAN M. South Africa in the company of giants: the search for leadership in a transforming global order. International Affairs 2013;89:111–29. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12007
97
Alden C, Soko M. South Africa’s economic relations with Africa: hegemony and its discontents. The Journal of Modern African Studies 2005;43:367–92. doi:10.1017/S0022278X05001011
98
Alden C, Schoeman M. South Africa’s symbolic hegemony in Africa. International Politics 2015;52:239–54. doi:10.1057/ip.2014.47
99
Bond P. Sub-imperialism as Lubricant of Neoliberalism: South African ‘deputy sheriff’ duty within. Third World Quarterly 2013;34:251–70. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.775783
100
Hornsby DJ, Black DR. Breaking with tradition? South Africa–UK relations. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 2016;54:268–86. doi:10.1080/14662043.2016.1151167
101
Pretorius J, Sauer T. The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs 2014;21:321–34. doi:10.1080/10220461.2014.965273
102
Verhoeven H, Murthy CSR, Soares de Oliveira R. ‘Our identity is our currency’: South Africa, the responsibility to protect and the logic of African intervention. Conflict, Security & Development 2014;14:509–34. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.930594
103
Beresford A. A responsibility to protect Africa from the West? South Africa and the NATO intervention in Libya. International Politics 2015;52:288–304. doi:10.1057/ip.2015.11
104
Habib A. South Africa’s foreign policy: hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation. South African Journal of International Affairs 2009;16:143–59. doi:10.1080/10220460903265857
105
Janis Van Der Westhuizen. South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power. Third World Quarterly 1998;19.https://0-www-jstor-org.wam.city.ac.uk/stable/3993132?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
106
Schoeman PM. South Africa as an emerging middle power. African Security Review 2000;9:47–58. doi:10.1080/10246029.2000.9628050
107
John J. Mearsheimer. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs 2014;93.https://www.jstor.org/stable/24483306
108
Alexander J. Motyl. THE SURREALISM OF REALISM: Misreading the War in Ukraine. World Affairs 2015;177.https://www.jstor.org/stable/43555427
109
SAKWA R. ‘New Cold War’ or twenty years’ crisis? Russia and international politics. International Affairs 2008;84:241–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00702.x
110
Derek Averre. From Pristina to Tskhinvali: The Legacy of Operation Allied Force in Russia’s Relations with the West. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 2009;85.https://www.jstor.org/stable/27695032
111
Cooley A. Chapter 1: Russia and the Recent Evolution of the SCO: Issues and Challenges for U.S. Policy - American Academy of Arts & Sciences. https://www.amacad.org/content/publications/pubContent.aspx?d=1135
112
Forsberg T, Herd G. Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 2015;23:41–57. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.1001824
113
Haukkala H. From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 2015;23:25–40. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822
114
Hughes J. Russia and the Secession of Kosovo: Power, Norms and the Failure of Multilateralism. Europe-Asia Studies 2013;65:992–1016. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.792448
115
Howorth J. ‘Stability on the Borders’: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 2017;55:121–36. doi:10.1111/jcms.12448
116
Sebastian Job. Globalising Russia? The Neoliberal/Nationalist Two-Step and the Russification of the West. Third World Quarterly 2001;22.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993455
117
Kurowska X. Multipolarity as resistance to liberal norms: Russia’s position on responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development 2014;14:489–508. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.930589
118
Peng C. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective. International Critical Thought 2017;7:267–78. doi:10.1080/21598282.2017.1316436
119
Romanova T. Is Russian Energy Policy towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package. Geopolitics 2016;21:857–79. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1155049
120
Sakwa R. The problem of ‘the international’ in Russian identity formation. International Politics 2012;49:449–65. doi:10.1057/ip.2012.10
121
Sakwa R, Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA. Russia against the rest: the post-Cold War crisis of world order. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2017. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675885
122
Hugh Gusterson. Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. Cultural Anthropology 1999;14.https://www.jstor.org/stable/656531
123
Kenneth N. Waltz. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs 2012;91.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
124
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N. Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs;91:157–62.https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
125
Pretorius J, Sauer T. The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs 2014;21:321–34. doi:10.1080/10220461.2014.965273
126
Gusterson H. Paranoid, Potbellied Stalinist Gets Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review 2008;15:21–42. doi:10.1080/10736700701852894
127
Scott Sagan, Kenneth Waltz and Richard K. Betts. A NUCLEAR IRAN: PROMOTING STABILITY OR COURTING DISASTER? Journal of International Affairs 2007;60.https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357975
128
Moshirzadeh H. Discursive Foundations of Iran’s Nuclear Policy. Security Dialogue 2007;38:521–43. doi:10.1177/0967010607084999
129
Kenneth N. Waltz. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs 2012;91.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23218033
130
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N. Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs;91:157–62.https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034969009?accountid=14510
131
Müller H. Icons Off the Mark. The Nonproliferation Review 2013;20:545–65. doi:10.1080/10736700.2013.849911
132
Kumar AV, Cambridge Books Online EBS. India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: The Perennial Outlier. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297319
133
Buszynski L. The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry. The Washington Quarterly 2012;35:139–56. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2012.666495
134
M. Taylor Fravel. Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes. International Security 2005;30:46–83.http://0-muse.jhu.edu.wam.city.ac.uk/article/190698
135
The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status, and implications. https://hz7fp2gl5k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE+NINE-DASH+LINE+IN+THE+SOUTH+CHINA+SEA%3A+HISTORY%2C+STATUS%2C+AND+IMPLICATIONS&rft.jtitle=AMERICAN+JOURNAL+OF+INTERNATIONAL+LAW&rft.au=Gao%2C+ZG&rft.au=Jia%2C+BB&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.pub=AMER+SOC+INT+LAW&rft.issn=0002-9300&rft.eissn=2161-7953&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=124&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000316626600004¶mdict=en-UK
136
Koo MG. Belling the Chinese Dragon at Sea: Western Theories and Asian Realities. Ocean Development & International Law 2017;48:52–68. doi:10.1080/00908320.2017.1265365
137
Jerden B. The Assertive China Narrative: Why It Is Wrong and How So Many Still Bought into It. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2014;7:47–88. doi:10.1093/cjip/pot019
138
Kreuzer P. A Comparison of Malaysian and Philippine Responses to China in the South China Sea. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2016;9:239–76. doi:10.1093/cjip/pow008
139
Lewis JW, Litai X. China’s security agenda transcends the South China Sea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2016;72:212–21. doi:10.1080/00963402.2016.1194056
140
Liff AP, Ikenberry GJ. Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security 2014;39:52–91. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00176
141
MORTON K. China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible? International Affairs 2016;92:909–40. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12658
142
Raine S. Beijing’s South China Sea Debate. Survival 2011;53:69–88. doi:10.1080/00396338.2011.621633
143
Scott D. India’s Role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in Play. India Review 2013;12:51–69. doi:10.1080/14736489.2013.786965
144
Yahuda M. China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Journal of Contemporary China 2013;22:446–59. doi:10.1080/10670564.2012.748964
145
Zhang (张 锋) F. Assessing China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling. Australian Journal of International Affairs 2017;71:440–59. doi:10.1080/10357718.2017.1287876
