1.
G. John Ikenberry: The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs. 90, 56–68 (2011).
2.
Mearsheimer, J.J.: The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 3, 381–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq016.
3.
Robinson, W.I.: The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective. Third World Quarterly. 36, 1–21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.976012.
4.
Weber, C., Taylor & Francis: International relations theory: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2014).
5.
Weber, C.: International relations theory: a critical introduction. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2014).
6.
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
7.
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
8.
Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2013).
9.
Enloe, C., JSTOR.: Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press, Berkeley (2014).
10.
Acharya, A.: Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 619–637 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811406574.
11.
Anghie, A.: Civilization and Commerce: The Concept of Governance in Historical Perspective, https://0-heinonline-org.wam.city.ac.uk/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/vllalr45&div=51&start_page=887&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
12.
Weber, C., Taylor & Francis: International relations theory: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2014).
13.
Weber, C.: International relations theory: a critical introduction. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2014).
14.
Barnett, M., Duvall, R.: Power in International Politics. International Organization. 59, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050010.
15.
Hobson, J.M., Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA.: The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
16.
Hobson, J.M.: The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
17.
Prashad, V.: NEOLIBERALISM WITH SOUTHERN CHARACTERISTICS - The rise of the BRICS, http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/neoliberalism-with-southern-characteristics/.
18.
Hopewell, K.: The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance. International Affairs. 93, 1377–1396 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix192.
19.
SHIMAZU, NAOKO: Diplomacy As Theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies. 48, 225–252.
20.
Cambridge Books Online EBS.: Bandung, global history, and international law: critical pasts and pending futures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017).
21.
Rodrigues Vieira, V.: Beyond the Market: The Global South and the WTO’s Normative Dimension. International Negotiation. 21, 267–294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341333.
22.
Keukeleire, S., Hooijmaaijers, B.: The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 52, 582–599 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12102.
23.
Xiaoyu, P.: Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 5, 341–367 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pos017.
24.
Mark T. Berger: After the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism. Third World Quarterly. 25, (2004).
25.
Hameiri, S., Jones, L.: Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China. European Journal of International Relations. 22, 72–98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115578952.
26.
Miller, M.C.: The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 9, 211–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow006.
27.
Mearsheimer, J.J.: The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 3, 381–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq016.
28.
Lee, P.K., Chan, L.-H.: China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs. 70, 179–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968.
29.
Miller, M.C., ProQuest (Firm): Wronged by empire: post-imperial ideology and foreign policy in India and China. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif (2013).
30.
Dreyer, J.T.: The ‘Tianxia Trope’: will China change the international system? Journal of Contemporary China. 24, 1015–1031 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1030951.
31.
Shaun Breslin: Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 85, (2009).
32.
Callahan, W.A.: Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review. 10, 749–761 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00830.x.
33.
Ferchen, M.: Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 390–420 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.660184.
34.
Suzuki, S.: Why Does China Participate in Intrusive Peacekeeping? Understanding Paternalistic Chinese Discourses on Development and Intervention. International Peacekeeping. 18, 271–285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2011.563079.
35.
Kiely, R.: "Poverty’s Fall”/China’s Rise: Global Convergence or New Forms of Uneven Development? Journal of Contemporary Asia. 38, 353–372 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330802078451.
36.
Legro, J.W.: What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power. Perspectives on Politics. 5, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707071526.
37.
Logan, J.: China, America, and the Pivot to Asia | Cato Institute, https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/china-america-pivot-asia.
38.
Shambaugh, D.: Coping with a Conflicted China. The Washington Quarterly. 34, 7–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2011.537974.
39.
Summers, T.: China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy. Third World Quarterly. 37, 1628–1643 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415.
40.
Xiaoyu, P.: Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 5, 341–367 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pos017.
41.
Miller, M.C., Sullivan de Estrada, K.: Pragmatism in Indian foreign policy: how ideas constrain Modi. International Affairs. 93, 27–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw001.
42.
NARLIKAR, A.: India rising: responsible to whom? International Affairs. 89, 595–614 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12035.
43.
IAN TAYLOR: India’s rise in Africa. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 88, (2012).
44.
Foot, R., Gaddis, J.L., Hurrell, A., ebrary, Inc, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science: Order and justice in international relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
45.
Bloomfield, A.: India and the Libyan Crisis: Flirting with the Responsibility to Protect, Retreating to the Sovereignty Norm. Contemporary Security Policy. 36, 27–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2015.1012347.
46.
Chiriyankandath, J.: Realigning India: Indian foreign policy after the Cold War. The Round Table. 93, 199–211 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/00358530410001679567.
47.
Ganguly, S., Pardesi, M.S.: Explaining Sixty Years of India’s Foreign Policy. India Review. 8, 4–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480802665162.
48.
Kampani, G.: New Delhi’s Long Nuclear Journey. International Security. 38, 79–114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00158.
49.
Andrew B. Kennedy: India’s Nuclear Odyssey: Implicit Umbrellas, Diplomatic Disappointments, and the Bomb. International Security. 36, (2011).
50.
Ladwig, W.C.: Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, "Look East,” and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific. Asian Security. 5, 87–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14799850902886476.
51.
Ladwig, W.C.: India and Military Power Projection: Will the Land of Gandhi Become a Conventional Great Power? Asian Survey. 50, 1162–1183 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2010.50.6.1162.
52.
Mehta, P.B.: Still Under Nehru’s Shadow? The Absence of Foreign Policy Frameworks in India. India Review. 8, 209–233 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480903116750.
53.
Michaelowa, KatharinaMichaelowa, Axel: India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy. 12, 575–590 (2012).
54.
Chatterjee Miller, M.: The Un-Argumentative Indian?: Ideas About the Rise of India and Their Interaction With Domestic Structures. India Review. 13, 1–14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2014.873670.
55.
MUKHERJEE, R., MALONE, D.M.: Indian foreign policy and contemporary security challenges. International Affairs. 87, 87–104 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00961.x.
56.
Rohan Mukherjee and David M. Malone: From High Ground to High Table: The Evolution of Indian Multilateralism. Global Governance. 17, (2011).
57.
Amrita Narlikar: All That Glitters Is Not Gold: India’s Rise to Power. Third World Quarterly. 28, (2007).
58.
Narang, V., Staniland, P.: Institutions and Worldviews in Indian Foreign Security Policy. India Review. 11, 76–94 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2012.674818.
59.
PANT, H.V., SUPER, J.M.: India’s ‘non-alignment’ conundrum: a twentieth-century policy in a changing world. International Affairs. 91, 747–764 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12336.
60.
Pant, H.V.: INDIAN FOREIGN POLICY CHALLENGES: SUBSTANTIVE UNCERTAINTIES AND INSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES. Asian Affairs. 40, 90–101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03068370802658724.
61.
Scott, D.: India’s "Extended Neighborhood” Concept: Power Projection for a Rising Power. India Review. 8, 107–143 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480902901038.
62.
Vincent Wei-cheng Wang: ‘Chindia’ or Rivalry? Rising China, Rising India, and Contending Perspectives on India-China Relations. Asian Perspective. 35, (2011).
63.
Scott, D.: The Great Power ‘Great Game’ between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography’. Geopolitics. 13, 1–26 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040701783243.
64.
Pan, C.: The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the Asian regional order. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 68, 453–469 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2014.884054.
65.
Kampani, G.: From existential to minimum deterrence: Explaining India’s decision to test. The Nonproliferation Review. 6, 12–24 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/10736709808436732.
66.
Ollapally, D.M.: Understanding Indian policy dilemmas in the Indo-Pacific through an India–US–China maritime triangle lens. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India. 12, 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2016.1181392.
67.
Sornarajah, M., Wang, J., Cambridge Books Online EBS.: China, India and the International Economic Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
68.
Brewster, D.: Beyond the ‘String of Pearls’: is there really a Sino-Indian security dilemma in the Indian Ocean? Journal of the Indian Ocean Region. 10, 133–149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2014.922350.
69.
Palit, A.: India’s Economic and Strategic Perceptions of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics. 22, 292–309 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1274305.
70.
Pant, H.V., Cambridge Books Online EBS.: The Rise of China: Implications for India. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
71.
Sharma, S.D., Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA.: China and India in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
72.
Brewster, D.: Indian Strategic Thinking about East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies. 34, 825–852 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.627155.
73.
Blanchard, J.-M.F., Flint, C.: The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics. 22, 223–245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503.
74.
Lee, P.K., Chan, L.-H.: China’s and India’s perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria? Australian Journal of International Affairs. 70, 179–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1121968.
75.
Turner, O.: China, India and the US Rebalance to the Asia Pacific: The Geopolitics of Rising Identities. Geopolitics. 21, 922–944 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1190708.
76.
Guihong, Z.: US-India Strategic Partnership. International Studies. 42, 277–293 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/002088170504200306.
77.
Abdenur, A.E., Folly, M., Moura, K., Jordão, S.A.S., Maia, P.: The BRICS and the South Atlantic: Emerging arena for South–South cooperation. South African Journal of International Affairs. 21, 303–319 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2014.972442.
78.
van der Westhuizen, J.: Brazil and South Africa: the ‘odd couple’ of the South Atlantic? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 54, 232–251 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2016.1151169.
79.
Merke, F.: Neither balance nor bandwagon: South American international society meets Brazil’s rising power. International Politics. 52, 178–192 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.49.
80.
Ogunnubi: South Africa and the Question of Hegemony in Africa. Journal of developing societies. 33, (2017).
81.
Marco Antonio Vieira and Chris Alden: India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership. Global Governance. 17, (2011).
82.
Jordaan, E.: Rising Powers and Human Rights: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum at the UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Human Rights. 14, 463–485 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2014.988784.
83.
Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira: The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism. Third World Quarterly. 26, (2005).
84.
Carranza, M.E.: Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12065.
85.
McDougall, D.: Responsibility While Protecting. Global Responsibility to Protect. 6, 64–87 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00601004.
86.
Stuenkel, O., Tourinho, M.: Regulating intervention: Brazil and the responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development. 14, 379–402 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.930593.
87.
Abdenur, A.E.: Rising powers in stormy seas: Brazil and the UNIFIL maritime task force. International Peacekeeping. 23, 389–415 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2016.1155413.
88.
Dauvergne, P., BL Farias, D.: The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power. Third World Quarterly. 33, 903–917 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.674704.
89.
de Freitas Barbosa, A., Narciso, T., Biancalana, M.: Brazil in Africa: Another Emerging Power in the Continent? Politikon. 36, 59–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340903155401.
90.
Andrés Malamud: A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy. Latin American Politics and Society. 53, (2011).
91.
Oliveira, G. de L.T.: The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 43, 348–372 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.992337.
92.
Sotero, P.: Brazil’s Rising Ambition in a Shifting Global Balance of Power. Politics. 30, 71–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01394.x.
93.
Cunliffe, P., Kenkel, K.M. eds: Brazil as a rising power: intervention norms and the contestation of global order. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2016).
94.
Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA.: Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016).
95.
Chatin, M.: Brazil: analysis of a rising soft power. Journal of Political Power. 9, 369–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232286.
96.
ALDEN, C., SCHOEMAN, M.: South Africa in the company of giants: the search for leadership in a transforming global order. International Affairs. 89, 111–129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12007.
97.
Alden, C., Soko, M.: South Africa’s economic relations with Africa: hegemony and its discontents. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 43, 367–392 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X05001011.
98.
Alden, C., Schoeman, M.: South Africa’s symbolic hegemony in Africa. International Politics. 52, 239–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.47.
99.
Bond, P.: Sub-imperialism as Lubricant of Neoliberalism: South African ‘deputy sheriff’ duty within. Third World Quarterly. 34, 251–270 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.775783.
100.
Hornsby, D.J., Black, D.R.: Breaking with tradition? South Africa–UK relations. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 54, 268–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2016.1151167.
101.
Pretorius, J., Sauer, T.: The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs. 21, 321–334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2014.965273.
102.
Verhoeven, H., Murthy, C.S.R., Soares de Oliveira, R.: ‘Our identity is our currency’: South Africa, the responsibility to protect and the logic of African intervention. Conflict, Security & Development. 14, 509–534 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.930594.
103.
Beresford, A.: A responsibility to protect Africa from the West? South Africa and the NATO intervention in Libya. International Politics. 52, 288–304 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.11.
104.
Habib, A.: South Africa’s foreign policy: hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation. South African Journal of International Affairs. 16, 143–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10220460903265857.
105.
Janis Van Der Westhuizen: South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power. Third World Quarterly. 19, (1998).
106.
Schoeman, P.M.: South Africa as an emerging middle power. African Security Review. 9, 47–58 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2000.9628050.
107.
John J. Mearsheimer: Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs. 93, (2014).
108.
Alexander J. Motyl: THE SURREALISM OF REALISM: Misreading the War in Ukraine. World Affairs. 177, (2015).
109.
SAKWA, R.: ‘New Cold War’ or twenty years’ crisis? Russia and international politics. International Affairs. 84, 241–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00702.x.
110.
Derek Averre: From Pristina to Tskhinvali: The Legacy of Operation Allied Force in Russia’s Relations with the West. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 85, (2009).
111.
Cooley, A.: Chapter 1: Russia and the Recent Evolution of the SCO: Issues and Challenges for U.S. Policy - American Academy of Arts & Sciences, https://www.amacad.org/content/publications/pubContent.aspx?d=1135.
112.
Forsberg, T., Herd, G.: Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 23, 41–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2014.1001824.
113.
Haukkala, H.: From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 23, 25–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822.
114.
Hughes, J.: Russia and the Secession of Kosovo: Power, Norms and the Failure of Multilateralism. Europe-Asia Studies. 65, 992–1016 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.792448.
115.
Howorth, J.: ‘Stability on the Borders’: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 55, 121–136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12448.
116.
Sebastian Job: Globalising Russia? The Neoliberal/Nationalist Two-Step and the Russification of the West. Third World Quarterly. 22, (2001).
117.
Kurowska, X.: Multipolarity as resistance to liberal norms: Russia’s position on responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development. 14, 489–508 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.930589.
118.
Peng, C.: Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective. International Critical Thought. 7, 267–278 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2017.1316436.
119.
Romanova, T.: Is Russian Energy Policy towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package. Geopolitics. 21, 857–879 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1155049.
120.
Sakwa, R.: The problem of ‘the international’ in Russian identity formation. International Politics. 49, 449–465 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.10.
121.
Sakwa, R., Cambridge Books Online Course Book EBA.: Russia against the rest: the post-Cold War crisis of world order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017).
122.
Hugh Gusterson: Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. Cultural Anthropology. 14, (1999).
123.
Kenneth N. Waltz: Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs. 91, (2012).
124.
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N: Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs. 91, 157–162.
125.
Pretorius, J., Sauer, T.: The nuclear security discourse: Proliferation vs disarmament concerns. South African Journal of International Affairs. 21, 321–334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2014.965273.
126.
Gusterson, H.: Paranoid, Potbellied Stalinist Gets Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review. 15, 21–42 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700701852894.
127.
Scott Sagan, Kenneth Waltz and Richard K. Betts: A NUCLEAR IRAN: PROMOTING STABILITY OR COURTING DISASTER? Journal of International Affairs. 60, (2007).
128.
Moshirzadeh, H.: Discursive Foundations of Iran’s Nuclear Policy. Security Dialogue. 38, 521–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607084999.
129.
Kenneth N. Waltz: Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs. 91, (2012).
130.
Kahl, Colin HWaltz, Kenneth N: Iran and the Bomb: Would a Nuclear Iran Make the Middle East More Secure?/Waltz Replies. Foreign Affairs. 91, 157–162.
131.
Müller, H.: Icons Off the Mark. The Nonproliferation Review. 20, 545–565 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2013.849911.
132.
Kumar, A.V., Cambridge Books Online EBS.: India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: The Perennial Outlier. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014).
133.
Buszynski, L.: The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry. The Washington Quarterly. 35, 139–156 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2012.666495.
134.
M. Taylor Fravel: Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes. International Security. 30, 46–83 (2005).
135.
The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status, and implications.
136.
Koo, M.G.: Belling the Chinese Dragon at Sea: Western Theories and Asian Realities. Ocean Development & International Law. 48, 52–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2017.1265365.
137.
Jerden, B.: The Assertive China Narrative: Why It Is Wrong and How So Many Still Bought into It. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 7, 47–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pot019.
138.
Kreuzer, P.: A Comparison of Malaysian and Philippine Responses to China in the South China Sea. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 9, 239–276 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow008.
139.
Lewis, J.W., Litai, X.: China’s security agenda transcends the South China Sea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 72, 212–221 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.1194056.
140.
Liff, A.P., Ikenberry, G.J.: Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security. 39, 52–91 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00176.
141.
MORTON, K.: China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible? International Affairs. 92, 909–940 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12658.
142.
Raine, S.: Beijing’s South China Sea Debate. Survival. 53, 69–88 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2011.621633.
143.
Scott, D.: India’s Role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in Play. India Review. 12, 51–69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2013.786965.
144.
Yahuda, M.: China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Journal of Contemporary China. 22, 446–459 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.748964.
145.
Zhang (张 锋), F.: Assessing China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 71, 440–459 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1287876.
