1
Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804007
2
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
3
Frieden JA. Global capitalism: its fall and rise in the twentieth century. New York: : W.W. Norton 2007.
4
Wittman D, Weingast BR, Oxford University Press Staff, et al. The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: : Oxford University Press, Incorporated https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F44403
5
Katzenstein PJ, EBL. Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1985. http://city.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3425965
6
Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804007
7
Knutsen CH. Democracy and economic growth: A survey of arguments and results. International Area Studies Review 2012;15:393–415. doi:10.1177/2233865912455268
8
Cox G, McCubbins M. ’The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes. Presidents, parliaments, and policy. 2001;Political economy of institutions and decisions.http://wcfia.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/671_mccubbins_cox.pdf?m=1427473083
9
Olson M. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review 1993;87. doi:10.2307/2938736
10
North DC, Weingast BR. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History 1989;49. doi:10.1017/S0022050700009451
11
Olson M. The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1982. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt1nprdd
12
Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804007
13
Wittman D, Weingast BR, Oxford University Press Staff, et al. The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: : Oxford University Press, Incorporated https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F44403
14
Quinn DP, Woolley JT. Democracy and National Economic Performance: The Preference for Stability. American Journal of Political Science 2001;45. doi:10.2307/2669243
15
Stasavage D. Credible Commitment in Early Modern Europe: North and Weingast Revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2002;18:155–86. doi:10.1093/jleo/18.1.155
16
Engerman SL, Sokoloff KL. Debating the Role of Institutions in Political and Economic Development: Theory, History, and Findings*. Annual Review of Political Science 2008;11:119–35. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.120406.135217
17
Doucouliagos H, Ulubaşoğlu MA. Democracy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 2008;52:61–83. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00299.x
18
North DC. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
19
Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. London: : Profile 2012.
20
Przeworski A, Alvarez ME, Cheibub JA, et al. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804946
21
Hall PA, Taylor RCR. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 1996;44:936–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
22
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA. Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. Handbook of Economic Growth. 2005.http://economics.mit.edu/files/4469
23
Barry R. Weingast. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1995;11:1–31.http://jleo.oxfordjournals.org/content/11/1/1.extract
24
Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F. Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth 2004;9:131–65. doi:10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
25
Baum MA, Lake DA. The Political Economy of Growth: Democracy and Human Capital. American Journal of Political Science 2003;47:333–47. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00023
26
Beaulieu E, Cox GW, Saiegh S. Sovereign Debt and Regime Type: Reconsidering the Democratic Advantage. International Organization 2012;66:709–38. doi:10.1017/S0020818312000288
27
Democracy, Autocracy, and Expropriation of Foreign Direct Investment. Comparative Political Studies 2009;42:1098–127. doi:10.1177/0010414009331723
28
Jensen NM. Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 2003;57. doi:10.1017/S0020818303573040
29
Schultz KA, Weingast BR. The Democratic Advantage: Institutional Foundations of Financial Power in International Competition. International Organization 2003;57. doi:10.1017/S0020818303571065
30
Gandhi J. Dictatorial Institutions and their Impact on Economic Growth. European Journal of Sociology 2008;49. doi:10.1017/S0003975608000015
31
Bailey MA, Goldstein J, Weingast BR. The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade. World Politics 1997;49:309–38.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054005?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
32
Mansfield ED, Milner HV, Rosendorff BP. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. The American Political Science Review 2000;94. doi:10.2307/2586014
33
Rickard SJ. A Non-Tariff Protectionist Bias in Majoritarian Politics: Government Subsidies and Electoral Institutions. International Studies Quarterly 2012;56:777–85. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00760.x
34
Rickard SJ. A Non-Tariff Protectionist Bias in Majoritarian Politics: Government Subsidies and Electoral Institutions. International Studies Quarterly 2012;56:777–85. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00760.x
35
Rogowski R. Trade and the variety of democratic institutions. International Organization 1987;41. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027442
36
Ehrlich SD. Access to Protection: Domestic Institutions and Trade Policy in Democracies. International Organization 2007;61. doi:10.1017/S0020818307070191
37
Hiscox MJ. The Magic Bullet? The RTAA, Institutional Reform, and Trade Liberalization. International Organization 1999;53:669–98. doi:10.1162/002081899551039
38
Wibbels E. Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance. American Journal of Political Science 2000;44. doi:10.2307/2669275
39
Bernhard W, Leblang D. Democratic Institutions and Exchange-rate Commitments. International Organization 1999;53:71–97. doi:10.1162/002081899550814
40
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
41
North DC. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
42
North DC. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
43
Keech WR. Economic Politics: The Costs of Democracy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609374
44
Keech WR. Economic Politics: The Costs of Democracy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609374
45
Przeworski A, Limongi F. Political Regimes and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1993;7:51–69. doi:10.1257/jep.7.3.51
46
Schumpeter JA, Schumpeter JA, Stiglitz JE. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: : Routledge 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=515353
47
Crepaz MML. Inclusion versus Exclusion: Political Institutions and Welfare Expenditures. Comparative Politics 1998;31. doi:10.2307/422106
48
Landa D, Kapstein EB. Inequality, Growth, and Democracy. World Politics 2001;53:264–96. doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0004
49
Knack S, Keefer P. Does Inequality Harm Growth Only in Democracies? A Replication and Extension. American Journal of Political Science 1997;41. doi:10.2307/2111719
50
Wright J. Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 2008;52:322–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00315.x
51
Olson M. The rise and decline of nations. London: : Yale University Press
52
Olson M. The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1982. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt1nprdd
53
Hancké B, Rhodes M, Thatcher M. Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=CityUniLon&isbn=9780191525681
54
Jensen NM. Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 2003;57. doi:10.1017/S0020818303573040
55
Sylwester K. Does Democracy Increase Growth More in New Countries? Economics & Politics 2015;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12055
56
Chandra S, Rudra N. Reassessing the Links between Regime Type and Economic Performance: Why Some Authoritarian Regimes Show Stable Growth and Others Do Not. British Journal of Political Science 2015;45:253–85. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000355
57
Moon C. Foreign Direct Investment, Commitment Institutions, and Time Horizon: How Some Autocrats Do Better than Others. International Studies Quarterly 2015;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/isqu.12182
58
Bak D. Political Investment Cycles in Democracies and Autocracies. International Interactions 2016;42:797–819. doi:10.1080/03050629.2016.1173547
59
Baumgartner FR, Carammia M, Epp DA, et al. Budgetary change in authoritarian and democratic regimes. Journal of European Public Policy 2017;:1–17. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1296482
60
Chandra S, Rudra N. Reassessing the Links between Regime Type and Economic Performance: Why Some Authoritarian Regimes Show Stable Growth and Others Do Not. British Journal of Political Science 2015;45:253–85. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000355
61
Osterloh S, Debus M. Partisan politics in corporate taxation. European Journal of Political Economy 2012;28:192–207. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.11.002
62
BUSEMEYER MR. From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research 2009;48:455–82. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00838.x
63
Allan JP, Scruggs L. Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science 2004;48:496–512. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x
64
Bermeo N. Does Electoral Democracy Boost Economic Equality? Journal of Democracy 2009;20:21–35. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0112
65
Franzese RJ. Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 2002;5:369–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112801.080924
66
Boix C. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174947
67
Wittman D, Weingast BR, Oxford University Press Staff, et al. The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: : Oxford University Press, Incorporated https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F44403
68
Wittman D, Weingast BR, Oxford University Press Staff, et al. The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: : Oxford University Press, Incorporated https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oxfordhandbooks.com%2Fview%2F10.1093%2Foxfordhb%2F9780199548477.001.0001%2Foxfordhb-9780199548477
69
Leighley JE, Oxford Handbooks Online. The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F34390
70
Garrett G. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625633
71
Wittman D, Weingast BR, Oxford University Press Staff, et al. The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: : Oxford University Press, Incorporated https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F44403
72
Boix C. Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Nations, 1960–93. World Politics 2000;53:38–73. doi:10.1017/S0043887100009370
73
Boix C. Political Parties and the Supply Side of the Economy: The Provision of Physical and Human Capital in Advanced Economies, 1960-90. American Journal of Political Science 1997;41. doi:10.2307/2111676
74
Boix C. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174947
75
Tufte ER. Political Control of the Economy. New edition. New Jersey: : Princeton University Press 1980.
76
Hibbs DA. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review 1977;71.
77
Oatley T. How Constraining is Capital Mobility? The Partisan Hypothesis in an Open Economy. American Journal of Political Science 1999;43. doi:10.2307/2991815
78
Garrett G, Lange P. Political responses to interdependence: what’s "left” for the left? International Organization 1991;45. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033208
79
KORPI W, PALME J. New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review 2003;97. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000789
80
Garrett G. Introduction. In: Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. 1–25.http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511625633
81
Garrett G. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625633
82
Tavitis M, Letki N. When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe. American Political Science Review 2009;103. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990220
83
Hibbs DA. Partisan theory after fifteen years. European Journal of Political Economy 1992;8:361–73. doi:10.1016/0176-2680(92)90001-W
84
Allan JP, Scruggs L. Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science 2004;48:496–512. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x
85
Canes-Wrone B, Park J-K. Electoral Business Cycles in OECD Countries. American Political Science Review 2012;106:103–22. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000529
86
Alesina A, Rosenthal H. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720512
87
Kayser MA. Who Surfs, Who Manipulates? The Determinants of Opportunistic Election Timing and Electorally Motivated Economic Intervention. American Political Science Review 2005;99:17–27.
88
Scheve K, Stasavage D. Institutions, Partisanship, and Inequality in the Long Run. World Politics 2009;61. doi:10.1017/S0043887109000094
89
Alvarez RM, Garrett G, Lange P. Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance. The American Political Science Review 1991;85. doi:10.2307/1963174
90
Blais A, Blake D, Dion S. Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 1993;37. doi:10.2307/2111523
91
Blais A, Blake D, Dion S. Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 1993;37. doi:10.2307/2111523
92
Cusack TR. Partisan Politics and Fiscal Policy. Comparative Political Studies 1999;32:464–86. doi:10.1177/0010414099032004003
93
Drazen A. The Political Business Cycle After 25 Years. NBER Chapters;:75–138.https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/11055.html
94
Clark WR, Hallerberg M. Mobile Capital, Domestic Institutions, and Electorally Induced Monetary and Fiscal Policy. The American Political Science Review 2000;94. doi:10.2307/2586015
95
Alesina A, Roubini N, Cohen GD. Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1997. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=11395&authtype=shib&custid=s1089299
96
Clark WR, Golder SN, Poast P. Monetary Institutions and the Political Survival of Democratic Leaders. International Studies Quarterly 2013;57:556–67. doi:10.1111/isqu.12013
97
Oatley T. How Constraining is Capital Mobility? The Partisan Hypothesis in an Open Economy. American Journal of Political Science 1999;43. doi:10.2307/2991815
98
Camyar I. Political Parties, Supply-Side Strategies, and Firms: The Political Micro-Economy of Partisan Politics. The Journal of Politics 2014;76:725–39. doi:10.1017/S0022381614000164
99
Sáez L. The Political Budget Cycle and Subnational Debt Expenditures in Federations: Panel Data Evidence from India. Governance 2015;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/gove.12130
100
Erikson RS, Wlezien C. Forecasting US Presidential Elections Using Economic and Noneconomic Fundamentals. PS: Political Science & Politics 2014;47:313–6. doi:10.1017/S1049096514000092
101
Efthyvoulou G. Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures. Public Choice 2012;153:295–327. doi:10.1007/s11127-011-9795-x
102
Bove V, Efthyvoulou G. Political Cycles in Public Expenditure: Butter vs. Guns. Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series Published Online First: 2013.http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.331548!/file/serps_2013016.pdf
103
Kim H, Kwon C. The Effects of Fiscal Consolidation and Welfare Composition of Spending on Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from US Gubernatorial Elections between 1978 and 2006. New Political Economy 2015;20:228–53. doi:10.1080/13563467.2014.923822
104
Krause GA. Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic Expectations. American Journal of Political Science 1997;41. doi:10.2307/2960486
105
Weschle S. Two types of economic voting: How economic conditions jointly affect vote choice and turnout. Electoral Studies 2014;34:39–53. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.10.007
106
Ademmer E, Dreher F. Constraining Political Budget Cycles: Media Strength and Fiscal Institutions in the Enlarged EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 2016;54:508–24. doi:10.1111/jcms.12306
107
Hellwig T. Explaining the salience of left-right ideology in postindustrial democracies: The role of structural economic change. European Journal of Political Research 2008;47:687–709. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00778.x
108
Pinto PM, Weymouth S. Partisan Cycles in Offshore Outsourcing: Evidence from U.S. Imports. Economics & Politics Published Online First: July 2016. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12078
109
Loftis MW, Mortensen PB. A new approach to the study of partisan effects on social policy. Journal of European Public Policy 2017;:1–22. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1298656
110
Healy AJ, Persson M, Snowberg E. Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey. American Political Science Review 2017;:1–15. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000314
111
Trein P, Beckmann R, Walter S. German Voters in Times of Crisis: The Impact of Perceptions and Economic Context on Electoral Behaviour. German Politics 2017;26:414–39. doi:10.1080/09644008.2016.1266482
112
Dassonneville R, Hooghe M. Economic indicators and electoral volatility: economic effects on electoral volatility in Western Europe, 1950–2013. Comparative European Politics 2017;15:919–43. doi:10.1057/cep.2015.3
113
JENSEN C. Issue compensation and right-wing government social spending. European Journal of Political Research 2010;49:282–99. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01898.x
114
Busemeyer MR. Skills and Inequality. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014.
115
Potrafke N. Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics Published Online First: December 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004
116
Belke A, Potrafke N. Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance 2012;31:1126–39. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.014
117
CANES-WRONE B, PARK J-K. Electoral Business Cycles in OECD Countries. American Political Science Review 2012;106:103–22. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000529
118
Potrafke N. Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice 2009;140:105–24. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9414-2
119
Raess D, Pontusson J. The politics of fiscal policy during economic downturns, 1981-2010. European Journal of Political Research 2015;54:1–22. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12074
120
Tavares J. Does right or left matter? Cabinets, credibility and fiscal adjustments. Journal of Public Economics 2004;88:2447–68. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.11.001
121
Tingley D. Donors and domestic politics: Political influences on foreign aid effort. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 2010;50:40–9. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2009.10.003
122
Dellmuth LM, Schraff D, Stoffel MF. Distributive Politics, Electoral Institutions and European Structural and Investment Funding: Evidence from Italy and France. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 2017;55:275–93. doi:10.1111/jcms.12433
123
Pinto L. Like Leaves in the Wind? Economic Conditions and Government Survival in Italy (1946–2015). South European Society and Politics 2017;:1–24. doi:10.1080/13608746.2017.1398626
124
Tilley J, Neundorf A, Hobolt SB. When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice. The Journal of Politics 2018;:000–000. doi:10.1086/694549
125
Fortunato D, Loftis MW. Cabinet Durability and Fiscal Discipline. American Political Science Review 2018;:1–15. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000436
126
Savage L. The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: The return of partisan policy making. Governance Published Online First: 2 September 2018. doi:10.1111/gove.12354
127
Potrafke N. Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics 2017;45:712–50. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004
128
Schmitt C. Panel data analysis and partisan variables: how periodization does influence partisan effects. Journal of European Public Policy 2016;23:1442–59. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1091030
129
Bremer B. The missing left? Economic crisis and the programmatic response of social democratic parties in Europe. Party Politics 2018;24:23–38. doi:10.1177/1354068817740745
130
Galasso V. The role of political partisanship during economic crises. Public Choice 2014;158:143–65. doi:10.1007/s11127-012-9956-6
131
King G, Rosen O, Tanner M, et al. Ordinary Economic Voting Behavior in the Extraordinary Election of Adolf Hitler. The Journal of Economic History 2008;68. doi:10.1017/S0022050708000788
132
Savage L. The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: The return of partisan policy making. Governance Published Online First: 2 September 2018. doi:10.1111/gove.12354
133
Dassonneville R, Lewis-Beck MS. A changing economic vote in Western Europe? Long-term vs. short-term forces. European Political Science Review 2019;11:91–108. doi:10.1017/S1755773918000231
134
Godwin K, Ainsworth SH, Godwin E. Lobbying and policymaking: the public pursuit of private interests. Los Angeles: : CQ Press 2013. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsk.sagepub.com%2Fcqpress%2Flobbying-and-policymaking
135
Falkner R. Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2F10.1057%2F9780230277892
136
Colli F, Kerremans B. Searching for influence: interest groups and social movements in the European Union. Journal of European Integration 2017;:1–7. doi:10.1080/07036337.2018.1406882
137
Gilens M, Page BI. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 2014;12:564–81. doi:10.1017/S1537592714001595
138
Coen D, Wilson GK, Wilson G, et al. The Oxford handbook of business and government. New York: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F34537
139
Vogel D. Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom. British Journal of Political Science 1987;17. doi:10.1017/S0007123400004841
140
Rasmussen A, Carroll BJ. Determinants of Upper-Class Dominance in the Heavenly Chorus: Lessons from European Union Online Consultations. British Journal of Political Science 2014;44:445–59. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000750
141
Woll C. The power of inaction: bank bailouts in comparison. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 2014. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstor.org%2Fstable%2F10.7591%2Fj.ctt5hh1zh
142
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
143
Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804007
144
Swenson PA. Varieties of Capitalist Interests: Power, Institutions, and the Regulatory Welfare State in the United States and Sweden. Studies in American Political Development 2004;18. doi:10.1017/S0898588X0400001X
145
Esping-Andersen G. Politics without Class: Postindustrial Cleavages in Europe and America. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999. http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139175050
146
Hacker JS, Pierson P. Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society 2010;38:152–204. doi:10.1177/0032329210365042
147
Fuchs D, Lederer MM. The Power of Business. Business and Politics 2008;9. doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1214
148
Culpepper PD. Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era. Business and Politics 2015;17. doi:10.1515/bap-2015-0031
149
Bell S. The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business. International Studies Quarterly 2012;56:661–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x
150
Culpepper PD, Reinke R. Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States. Politics & Society 2014;42:427–54. doi:10.1177/0032329214547342
151
Przeworski A, Wallerstein M. Structural Dependence of the State on Capital. The American Political Science Review 1988;82. doi:10.2307/1958056
152
Becker GS. A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1983;98. doi:10.2307/1886017
153
COEN D. The European Business Interest and the Nation State: Large-firm Lobbying in the European Union and Member States. Journal of Public Policy 1998;18:75–100. doi:10.1017/S0143814X9800004X
154
Rasmussen A, Carroll BJ. Determinants of Upper-Class Dominance in the Heavenly Chorus: Lessons from European Union Online Consultations. British Journal of Political Science 2014;44:445–59. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000750
155
Oxford Handbooks Online. The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oxfordhandbooks.com%2Fview%2F10.1093%2Foxfordhb%2F9780199662814.001.0001%2Foxfordhb-9780199662814
156
Baumgartner FR, Berry JM, Hojnacki M, et al. Lobbying and policy change: who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2009. http://city.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=471787
157
Levy D, Aseem Prakash. Bargains Old and New: Multinational Corporations in Global Governance. Business and Politics 2003;5.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.132.9040&rep=rep1&type=pdf
158
Siaroff A. Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research 1999;36:175–205. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00467
159
Hicks A. National Collective Action and Economic Performance: A Review Article. International Studies Quarterly 1988;32. doi:10.2307/2600624
160
Binderkrantz AS, Christiansen PM. From classic to modern corporatism. Interest group representation in Danish public committees in 1975 and 2010. Journal of European Public Policy 2015;22:1022–39. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.1000365
161
Schmitter PC. The Changing Politics of Organised Interests. West European Politics 2008;31:195–210. doi:10.1080/01402380701834994
162
Eising R. The access of business interests to EU institutions: towards élite pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy 2007;14:384–403. doi:10.1080/13501760701243772
163
Olson M. The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1982. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt1nprdd
164
Olson M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1971. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=282683&authtype=shib&custid=s1089299
165
Naoi M, Krauss E. Who Lobbies Whom? Special Interest Politics under Alternative Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 2009;53:874–92. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00406.x
166
Hall R, Deardorff A. Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review 2006;100. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062010
167
Thelen K, Fulcher J, Streeck W, et al. Beyond Corporatism: Toward a New Framework for the Study of Labor in Advanced Capitalism. Comparative Politics 1994;27. doi:10.2307/422220
168
Halpin D, Jordan AG. The scale of interest organization in democratic politics: Data and research methods. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2F10.1057%2F9780230359239
169
Wallerstein M, Western B. Unions in Decline? What Has Changed and Why. Annual Review of Political Science 2000;3:355–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.355
170
Woll C. Firm interests: how governments shape business lobbying on global trade. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 2008.
171
Culpepper PD. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760716
172
Stigler GJ. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 1971;2. doi:10.2307/3003160
173
Michael J. Hiscox. ’Class Versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade. International Organization 2001;55:1–46.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078596
174
Rogowski R. Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. The American Political Science Review 1987;81:1121–37.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1962581?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
175
Rogowski R. Commerce and coalitions: how trade affects domestic political alignments. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1990.
176
Alt JE, Gilligan M. The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Action Problems and Domestic Political Institutions. Journal of Political Philosophy 1994;2:165–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.1994.tb00020.x
177
Alt JE, Carlsen F, Heum P, et al. Asset Specificity and the Political Behavior of Firms: Lobbying for Subsidies in Norway. International Organization 1999;53:99–116. doi:10.1162/002081899550823
178
Martin CJ, Swank D. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139088299
179
Swank D. Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations. The American Political Science Review 1992;86. doi:10.2307/1964014
180
Vogel D. Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom. British Journal of Political Science 1987;17. doi:10.1017/S0007123400004841
181
Walker ET, Rea CM. The Political Mobilization of Firms and Industries. Annual Review of Sociology 2014;40:281–304. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043215
182
Culpepper PD, Reinke R. Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States. Politics & Society 2014;42:427–54. doi:10.1177/0032329214547342
183
Hall R, Deardorff A. Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review 2006;100. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062010
184
Ademmer E, Dreher F. Constraining Political Budget Cycles: Media Strength and Fiscal Institutions in the Enlarged EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 2016;54:508–24. doi:10.1111/jcms.12306
185
De Bruycker I. Pressure and Expertise: Explaining the Information Supply of Interest Groups in EU Legislative Lobbying. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 2016;54:599–616. doi:10.1111/jcms.12298
186
Bell S, Hindmoor A. Structural Power and the Politics of Bank Capital Regulation in the United Kingdom. Political Studies Published Online First: 13 May 2016. doi:10.1177/0032321716629479
187
Woll C. Politics in the Interest of Capital: A Not-So-Organized Combat. Politics & Society 2016;44:373–91. doi:10.1177/0032329216655318
188
Chalmers AW. When Banks Lobby: The Effects of Organizational Characteristics and Banking Regulations on International Bank Lobbying. Business and Politics 2017;19:107–34. doi:10.1017/bap.2016.7
189
Hofman A, Aalbers MB. Spaces of lobbying. Geography Compass 2017;11. doi:10.1111/gec3.12309
190
Kastner L. From Outsiders to Insiders: A Civil Society Perspective on EU Financial Reforms. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Published Online First: 9 October 2017. doi:10.1111/jcms.12644
191
Dür A, Mateo G. Public opinion and interest group influence: how citizen groups derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Journal of European Public Policy 2014;21:1199–217. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
192
Bell S. The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business. International Studies Quarterly 2012;56:661–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x
193
Fairfield T. Structural power in comparative political economy: perspectives from policy formulation in Latin America. Business and Politics 2015;17:411–41. doi:10.1515/bap-2014-0047
194
Giger N, Klüver H. Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation. American Journal of Political Science 2016;60:190–205. doi:10.1111/ajps.12183
195
Evans A. The politics of pro-worker reforms. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 6 November 2018. doi:10.1093/soceco/mwy042
196
Beyers J, Braun C. Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers. Journal of Public Policy 2014;34:93–121. doi:10.1017/S0143814X13000263
197
Woll C. Leading the Dance? Power and Political Resources of Business Lobbyists. Journal of Public Policy 2007;27. doi:10.1017/S0143814X07000633
198
Jackson G, Deeg R. How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity. 2006.http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp06-2.pdf
199
Witt MA, Redding G. Asian business systems: institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review 2013;11:265–300. doi:10.1093/ser/mwt002
200
Feldmann M. Global Varieties of Capitalism. World Politics 2019;71:162–96. doi:10.1017/S0043887118000230
201
Morgan G, Oxford Handbooks Online. The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F34531
202
Hall PA, Soskice DW. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2001. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=3052699
203
Hancké B, Rhodes M, Thatcher M. Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=CityUniLon&isbn=9780191525681
204
Overbeek H, Apeldoorn B van. Neoliberalism in crisis. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2F10.1057%2F9781137002471
205
Katzenstein PJ. Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1985. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=3425965
206
Hall PA, Thelen K. Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 2008;7:7–34. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn020
207
Hall PA, Gingerich DW. Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 2009;39. doi:10.1017/S0007123409000672
208
Howell C. Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One? Comparative Politics 2003;36:103–24.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4150162?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
209
Thelen K. Varieties of Capitalism: Trajectories of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Annual Review of Political Science 2012;15:137–59. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-070110-122959
210
Crouch C. Capitalist diversity and change: recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=149356&authtype=shib&custid=s1089299
211
Thelen K. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790997
212
Streeck W, Yamamura Kμ. The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 2001.
213
Thatcher M. Varieties of Capitalism in an Internationalized World: Domestic Institutional Change in European Telecommunications. Comparative Political Studies 2004;37:751–80. doi:10.1177/0010414004266868
214
Berger S, Dore R. National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca, [N.Y.]: : Cornell University Press 1996.
215
Deeg R, Jackson G. Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review 2006;5:149–79. doi:10.1093/ser/mwl021
216
Carney RW. Chinese Capitalism in the OECD Mirror. New Political Economy 2009;14:71–99. doi:10.1080/13563460802673309
217
Carlin W, Soskice D. German economic performance: disentangling the role of supply-side reforms, macroeconomic policy and coordinated economy institutions. Socio-Economic Review 2008;7:67–99. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn021
218
Feldmann M. Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries: Industrial Relations and Wage Bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia. Comparative Political Studies 2006;39:829–54. doi:10.1177/0010414006288261
219
Nölke A, Vliegenthart A. Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe. World Politics 2009;61. doi:10.1017/S0043887109990098
220
Schneider BR. Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 2009;41. doi:10.1017/S0022216X09990186
221
Streeck W. E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism. 2010.http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp10-12.pdf
222
Soederberg S, Menz G, Cerny PG. Internalizing globalization: The rise of neoliberalism and the decline of national varieties of capitalism. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2F10.1057%2F9780230524439
223
Nölke A. International financial regulation and domestic coalitions in state-permeated capitalism: China and global banking rules. International Politics 2015;52:743–59. doi:10.1057/ip.2015.17
224
Storz C, Amable B, Casper S, et al. Bringing Asia into the comparative capitalism perspective. Socio-Economic Review 2013;11:217–32. doi:10.1093/ser/mwt004
225
Cusack TR, Iversen T, Soskice D. Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems. American Political Science Review 2007;101. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070384
226
Allen M. The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety? Socio-Economic Review 2004;2:87–108. doi:10.1093/soceco/2.1.87
227
Wood G, Dibben P, Ogden S. Comparative Capitalism without Capitalism, and Production without Workers: The Limits and Possibilities of Contemporary Institutional Analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews 2014;16:384–96. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12025
228
McNally CA. Sino-Capitalism: China’s Reemergence and the International Political Economy. World Politics 2012;64:741–76. doi:10.1017/S0043887112000202
229
Darcillon T. How does finance affect labor market institutions? An empirical analysis in 16 OECD countries. Socio-Economic Review 2015;13:477–504. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu038
230
Piore MJ. Varieties of Capitalism Theory: Its Considerable Limits. Politics & Society 2016;44:237–41. doi:10.1177/0032329216638059
231
Schneider MR, Paunescu M. Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: a test of the Hall and Soskice claims. Socio-Economic Review 2012;10:731–53. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr038
232
Farkas B. Models of capitalism in the European Union: post-crisis perspectives. London: : Palgrave Macmillan 2016. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=CityUniLon&isbn=9781137600578
233
Farkas B. The Central and Eastern European model of capitalism. Post-Communist Economies 2011;23:15–34. doi:10.1080/14631377.2011.546972
234
Hall PA. Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 2018;25:7–30. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1310278
235
Casey T. Mapping stability and change in advanced capitalisms. Comparative European Politics 2009;7:255–78. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.19
236
Hay C. Does capitalism (still) come in varieties? Review of International Political Economy 2019;:1–18. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1633382
237
Hall PA. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 1993;25. doi:10.2307/422246
238
Schmidt VA, Thatcher M, editors. Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139857086
239
Farrell H, Quiggin J. Consensus, Dissensus and Economic Ideas: The Rise and Fall of Keynesianism During the Economic Crisis. 2012.http://www.henryfarrell.net/Keynes.pdf
240
Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804007
241
Widmaier W. The power of economic ideas – through, over and in – political time: the construction, conversion and crisis of the neoliberal order in the US and UK. Journal of European Public Policy 2015;:1–19. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115890
242
Schmidt VA, Thatcher M, editors. Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139857086
243
Hall PA, Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on States and Social Structures. The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1989.
244
Blyth M. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087230
245
Blyth M. The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change. World Politics 2001;54:1–26. doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0020
246
Blyth MM. ‘Any More Bright Ideas?’ The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy. Comparative Politics 1997;29. doi:10.2307/422082
247
Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2001;4:391–416. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
248
Blyth M. Paradigms and Paradox: The Politics of Economic Ideas in Two Moments of Crisis. Governance 2013;26:197–215. doi:10.1111/gove.12010
249
Blyth M, EBL. Austerity: the history of a dangerous idea. New York, N.Y.: : Oxford University Press 2013. http://city.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1141983
250
Ban C, Blyth M. The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction. Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:241–55. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.779374
251
Ferchen M. Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus. Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:390–420. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660184
252
Mukherji R. Ideas, interests, and the tipping point: Economic change in India. Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:363–89. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.716371
253
Ban C. Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism: New paradigm or edited orthodoxy? Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:298–331. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660183
254
Babb S. The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor. Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:268–97. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.640435
255
Blyth M. Austerity as ideology: A reply to my critics. Comparative European Politics 2013;11:737–51. doi:10.1057/cep.2013.25
256
Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Socio-Economic Review 2015;13:679–701. doi:10.1093/ser/mwv004
257
Culpepper PD. The Politics of Common Knowledge: Ideas and Institutional Change in Wage Bargaining. International Organization 2008;62. doi:10.1017/S0020818308080016
258
Jacobsen JK. Much Ado About Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy. World Politics 1995;47:283–310. doi:10.1017/S0043887100016117
259
McNamara KR. The currency of ideas: monetary politics in the European Union. Pbk. ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1999.
260
Abdelal R, Blyth M, Parsons C. Constructing the international economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 2010.
261
Abdelal R, Blyth M, Parsons C. Constructing the international economy. Ithaca, NY: : Cornell University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v789
262
Crouch C, EBL. Strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2013. http://city.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1184115
263
Peter M. Haas. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 1992;46:1–35.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706951
264
SCHMIDT VA. Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment? Comparative Political Studies 2002;35:168–93. doi:10.1177/0010414002035002002
265
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
266
Blyth M. The new Ideas scholarship in the mirror of historical institutionalism: a case of old whines in new bottles? Journal of European Public Policy 2015;:1–8. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1118292
267
Matthijs M. Powerful rules governing the euro: the perverse logic of German ideas. Journal of European Public Policy 2015;:1–17. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115535
268
Carstensen MB, Schmidt VA. Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy 2015;:1–20. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
269
Morrison JA. Shocking Intellectual Austerity: The Role of Ideas in the Demise of the Gold Standard in Britain. International Organization 2015;:1–33. doi:10.1017/S0020818315000314
270
Helgadóttir O. The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 2015;:1–18. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1106573
271
Rodrik D. When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2014;28:189–208. doi:10.1257/jep.28.1.189
272
Béland D, Cox RH, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science. Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford, [England]: : Oxford University Press 2011. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F5465
273
Appel H, Orenstein MA. Why did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World? Comparative Politics 2016;48:313–31. doi:10.5129/001041516818254419
274
Stirling A, Laybourn-Langton L. Time for a New Paradigm? Past and Present Transitions in Economic Policy. The Political Quarterly Published Online First: 1 September 2017. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12415
275
Hopkin J, Rosamond B. Post-truth Politics, Bullshit and Bad Ideas: ‘Deficit Fetishism’ in the UK. New Political Economy 2017;:1–15. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1373757
276
Christensen J, Ebook Central. The power of economists within the state. Stanford, California: : Stanford University Press 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=4862151
277
Morrison JA. Shocking Intellectual Austerity: The Role of Ideas in the Demise of the Gold Standard in Britain. International Organization 2016;70:175–207. doi:10.1017/S0020818315000314
278
Bremer B, McDaniel S. The ideational foundations of social democratic austerity in the context of the great recession. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 14 February 2019. doi:10.1093/ser/mwz001
279
Salverda W, Nolan B, Smeeding TM, et al. The Oxford handbook of economic inequality. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F34553
280
Boix C, Stokes SC, Oxford Handbooks Online. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. New York: : Oxford University Press, Incorporated https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F28345
281
Pierson P. The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics 1996;48:143–79. doi:10.1353/wp.1996.0004
282
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. Principles of comparative politics. Third edition, International student edition. Thousand Oaks, California: : SAGE 2018.
283
Rudra N. Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491870
284
Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: : Polity 1990.
285
Garrett G. Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle? International Organization 1998;52:787–824. doi:10.1162/002081898550752
286
Scheve K. Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2006;1:255–86. doi:10.1561/100.00005052
287
Alesina A, Glaeser E, Sacerdote B. Why Doesn’t The US Have A European-Style Welfare State? 2011.http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/glaeser/files/why_doesnt_the_u.s._have_a_european-style_welfare_state.pdf
288
Iversen T, Cusack TR. The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization? World Politics 2000;52:313–49. doi:10.1017/S0043887100016567
289
Cusack T, Iversen T, Rehm P. Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2006;22:365–89. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grj022
290
Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804007
291
Boix C. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174947
292
Cusack TR. Partisan Politics and Fiscal Policy. Comparative Political Studies 1999;32:464–86. doi:10.1177/0010414099032004003
293
Iversen T, Soskice D. Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review 2006;100. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062083
294
Iversen T. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758645
295
Whitten GD, Williams LK. Buttery Guns and Welfare Hawks: The Politics of Defense Spending in Advanced Industrial Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 2011;55:117–34. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00479.x
296
Lupu N, Pontusson J. The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution. American Political Science Review 2011;105:316–36. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000128
297
Iversen T, Soskice D. Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century. World Politics 2009;61. doi:10.1017/S004388710900015X
298
Bartels LM. Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics 2005;3. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050036
299
Ross F. Cutting Public Expenditures in Advanced Industrial Democracies: The Importance of Avoiding Blame. Governance 1997;10:175–200. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.361997036
300
Quinn DP, Shapiro RY. Business Political Power: The Case of Taxation. The American Political Science Review 1991;85. doi:10.2307/1963853
301
Moene KO, Wallerstein M. Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending: A Disaggregated Analysis. World Politics 2003;55:485–516. doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0022
302
Hicks A, Kenworthy L. Varieties of welfare capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 2003;1:27–61. doi:10.1093/soceco/1.1.27
303
Swenson P, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science. Capitalists against markets: the making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. New York: : Oxford University Press 2002. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F11836
304
Giger N, Nelson M. The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research 2011;50:1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01922.x
305
Mares I. The Sources of Business Interest in Social Insurance: Sectoral versus National Differences. World Politics 2003;55:229–58. doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0012
306
Rehm P, Hacker JS, Schlesinger M. Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State. American Political Science Review 2012;106:386–406. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000147
307
Swank D, Martin CJ. Employers and the Welfare State: The Political Economic Organization of Firms and Social Policy in Contemporary Capitalist Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 2001;34:889–923. doi:10.1177/0010414001034008003
308
Clayton R, Pontusson J. Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies. World Politics 1998;51:67–98. doi:10.1017/S0043887100007796
309
Korpi W. Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. World Politics 2006;58:167–206. doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0026
310
Paster T. Business and Welfare State Development: Why Did Employers Accept Social Reforms? World Politics 2013;65:416–51. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000117
311
Mares I, Carnes ME. Social Policy in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Political Science 2009;12:93–113. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.071207.093504
312
Pierson P, ebrary, Inc, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford [England]: : Oxford University Press 2001. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F25843
313
Kaufman RR, Segura-Ubiergo A. Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973–97. World Politics 2001;53:553–87. doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0016
314
Rudra N, Haggard S. Globalization, Democracy, and Effective Welfare Spending in the Developing World. Comparative Political Studies 2005;38:1015–49. doi:10.1177/0010414005279258
315
Kenworthy L, Pontusson J. Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries. Perspectives on Politics 2005;3. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050292
316
Korpi W. Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. World Politics 2006;58:167–206. doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0026
317
Busemeyer MR. From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research 2009;48:455–82. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00838.x
318
Jahn D. Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development. International Organization 2006;60. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060127
319
Swank D. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613371
320
Wibbels E. Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles, and Social Spending in the Developing World. International Organization 2006;60. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060139
321
Manow P. Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review 2008;7:101–21. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn022
322
Alesina A, Giugliano P. Preferences for Redistribution. 2009.http://www.nber.org/papers/w14825.pdf
323
Walter S. Crisis Politics in Europe: Why Austerity Is Easier to Implement in Some Countries Than in Others. Comparative Political Studies Published Online First: 16 December 2015. doi:10.1177/0010414015617967
324
Pontusson J, Raess D. How (and Why) Is This Time Different? The Politics of Economic Crisis in Western Europe and the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 2012;15:13–33. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-100955
325
Rodrik D. Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy 1998;106:997–1032. doi:10.1086/250038
326
Adserà A, Boix C. Trade, Democracy, and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness. International Organization 2002;56:229–62. doi:10.1162/002081802320005478
327
Cameron DR. The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 1978;72:1243–61. doi:10.2307/1954537
328
Wibbels E. Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles, and Social Spending in the Developing World. International Organization 2006;60. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060139
329
Mosley L. Room to Move: International Financial Markets and National Welfare States. International Organization 2000;54:737–73. doi:10.1162/002081800551352
330
Swank D. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613371
331
Mosley L. Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615672
332
Armingeon K. The Politics of Fiscal Responses to the Crisis of 2008-2009. Governance 2012;25:543–65. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01594.x
333
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
334
Mosley L. Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615672
335
Boix C. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174947
336
Cheibub JA. Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems. American Political Science Review 2006;100. doi:10.1017/S000305540606223X
337
Hacker JS, Pierson P. Abandoning the Middle: The Bush Tax Cuts and the Limits of Democratic Control. Perspectives on Politics 2005;3. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050048
338
Bradley D, Huber E, Moller S, et al. Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies. World Politics 2003;55:193–228. doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0009
339
Hicks AM, Swank DH. Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960-82. The American Political Science Review 1992;86. doi:10.2307/1964129
340
Klitgaard MB, Schumacher G, Soentken M. The partisan politics of institutional welfare state reform. Journal of European Public Policy 2014;:1–19. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.978355
341
Heins E, de la Porte C. The sovereign debt crisis, the EU and welfare state reform. Comparative European Politics 2015;13:1–7. doi:10.1057/cep.2014.38
342
Barnes L. The size and shape of government: preferences over redistributive tax policy. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 27 March 2014. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu007
343
Iversen T, Soskice D. Democratic Limits to Redistribution: Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Coalitions in the Knowledge Economy. World Politics 2015;:1–41. doi:10.1017/S0043887115000039
344
Finseraas H, Vernby K. What parties are and what parties do: partisanship and welfare state reform in an era of austerity. Socio-Economic Review 2011;9:613–38. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr003
345
Rueda D. The State of the Welfare State: Unemployment, Labor Market Policy, and Inequality in the Age of Workfare. Comparative Politics 2015;47:296–314. doi:10.5129/001041515814709275
346
van Nispen FKM. Policy Analysis in Times of Austerity: A Cross-National Comparison of Spending Reviews. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 2015;:1–23. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1005929
347
Afonso A. Choosing whom to betray: populist right-wing parties, welfare state reforms and the trade-off between office and votes. European Political Science Review 2015;7:271–92. doi:10.1017/S1755773914000125
348
Kersbergen K van, Vis B. Comparative Welfare State Politics: Development, Opportunities, and Reform. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021852
349
Jensen C, Seeberg HB. The power of talk and the welfare state: evidence from 23 countries on an asymmetric opposition-government response mechanism. Socio-Economic Review 2015;13:215–33. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu016
350
Bohle D. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. West European Politics 2015;:1–2. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1114296
351
Mares I. The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. In: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. 358–75.http://0-dx.doi.org.wam.city.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511804007
352
Raess D, Pontusson J. The politics of fiscal policy during economic downturns, 1981-2010. European Journal of Political Research 2015;54:1–22. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12074
353
Hübscher E. The politics of fiscal consolidation revisited. Journal of Public Policy 2015;:1–29. doi:10.1017/S0143814X15000057
354
Plümper T, Troeger VE, Winner H. Why is There No Race to the Bottom in Capital Taxation? International Studies Quarterly 2009;53:761–86. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00555.x
355
Dellepiane-Avellaneda S, Hardiman N. Fiscal politics in time: pathways to fiscal consolidation in Ireland, Greece, Britain, and Spain, 1980–2012. European Political Science Review 2015;7:189–219. doi:10.1017/S1755773914000186
356
Lierse H, Seelkopf L. Room to Manoeuvre? International Financial Markets and the National Tax State. New Political Economy 2016;21:145–65. doi:10.1080/13563467.2014.999761
357
Swank D. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613371
358
Allan JP, Scruggs L. Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science 2004;48:496–512. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x
359
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
360
Iversen T. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758645
361
Swank D. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613371
362
Armingeon K, Guthmann K, Weisstanner D. Choosing the path of austerity: how parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics 2015;:1–20. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1111072
363
Manow P. Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review 2008;7:101–21. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn022
364
Korpi W. Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. World Politics 2006;58:167–206. doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0026
365
Blyth M. The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change. World Politics 2001;54:1–26. doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0020
366
Ha E. Globalization, Veto Players, and Welfare Spending. Comparative Political Studies 2007;41:783–813. doi:10.1177/0010414006298938
367
Swank D. Taxing choices: international competition, domestic institutions and the transformation of corporate tax policy. Journal of European Public Policy 2015;:1–33. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1053511
368
Ostry J, Berg A, Tsangarides C. Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf
369
Fernández-Albertos J, Manzano D. Dualism and support for the welfare state. Comparative European Politics 2016;14:349–75. doi:10.1057/cep.2014.32
370
Armingeon K, Guthmann K, Weisstanner D. Choosing the path of austerity: how parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics 2016;39:628–47. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1111072
371
Bueno de Mesquita B, Downs G, Smith A. A Political Economy of Income Tax Policies. Political Science Research and Methods 2017;5:1–29. doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.53
372
Menendez I. Globalization and Welfare Spending: How Geography and Electoral Institutions Condition Compensation. International Studies Quarterly 2016;60:665–76. doi:10.1093/isq/sqw028
373
ARNOLD T, STADELMANN-STEFFEN I. How federalism influences welfare spending: Belgium federalism reform through the perspective of the synthetic control method. European Journal of Political Research Published Online First: March 2017. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12196
374
Baumgartner FR, Carammia M, Epp DA, et al. Budgetary change in authoritarian and democratic regimes. Journal of European Public Policy 2017;:1–17. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1296482
375
Franco Chuaire M, Scartascini C, Tommasi M. State capacity and the quality of policies revisiting the relationship between openness and government size. Economics & Politics Published Online First: 20 April 2017. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12090
376
Busemeyer MR, Garritzmann JL. Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states: evidence from a new comparative survey. Journal of European Public Policy 2017;:1–19. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1298658
377
Barnes L. The size and shape of government: preferences over redistributive tax policy. Socio-Economic Review 2015;13:55–78. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu007
378
Oser J, Hooghe M. Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor? Support for Social Citizenship Rights in the United States and Europe. Sociological Perspectives Published Online First: 26 March 2017. doi:10.1177/0731121417697305
379
König PD, Wenzelburger G. Honeymoon in the crisis: A comparative analysis of the strategic timing of austerity policies and their effect on government popularity in three countries. Comparative European Politics 2017;15:991–1015. doi:10.1057/cep.2016.1
380
Osterloh S, Debus M. Partisan politics in corporate taxation. European Journal of Political Economy 2012;28:192–207. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.11.002
381
JENSEN C. Issue compensation and right-wing government social spending. European Journal of Political Research 2010;49:282–99. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01898.x
382
Raess D, Pontusson J. The politics of fiscal policy during economic downturns, 1981-2010. European Journal of Political Research 2015;54:1–22. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12074
383
Neundorf A, Soroka S. The origins of redistributive policy preferences: political socialisation with and without a welfare state. West European Politics 2017;:1–28. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1388666
384
Pontusson J, Weisstanner D. Macroeconomic conditions, inequality shocks and the politics of redistribution, 1990–2013. Journal of European Public Policy 2018;25:31–58. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1310280
385
Scruggs L, Hayes TJ. The Influence of Inequality on Welfare Generosity. Politics & Society 2017;45:35–66. doi:10.1177/0032329216683165
386
Neundorf A, Soroka S. The origins of redistributive policy preferences: political socialisation with and without a welfare state. West European Politics 2018;41:400–27. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1388666
387
Feierherd G, Schiumerini L, Stokes S. When Do the Wealthy Support Redistribution? Inequality Aversion in Buenos Aires. British Journal of Political Science 2017;:1–13. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000588
388
Emmenegger P, Marx P. The Politics of Inequality as Organised Spectacle: Why the Swiss Do Not Want to Tax the Rich. New Political Economy 2018;:1–22. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1420641
389
Alemán J, Woods D. A Comparative Analysis of Inequality and Redistribution in Democracies. International Studies Quarterly 2018;62:171–81. doi:10.1093/isq/sqx089
390
Abou-Chadi T, Immergut EM. Recalibrating social protection: Electoral competition and the new partisan politics of the welfare state. European Journal of Political Research Published Online First: 15 October 2018. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12308
391
Savage L. The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: The return of partisan policy making. Governance Published Online First: 2 September 2018. doi:10.1111/gove.12354
392
Bremer B, McDaniel S. The ideational foundations of social democratic austerity in the context of the great recession. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 14 February 2019. doi:10.1093/ser/mwz001
393
Savage L. Religion, partisanship and preferences for redistribution. European Journal of Political Research Published Online First: 16 May 2019. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12341
394
Lockwood E. The Global Politics of Central Banking: A View from Political Science. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/55059/2016_WP5_Lockwood.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
395
McNamara K. Rational Fictions: Central Bank Independence and the Social Logic of Delegation. West European Politics 2002;25:47–76. doi:10.1080/713601585
396
Fernández-Albertos J. The Politics of Central Bank Independence. Annual Review of Political Science 2015;18:217–37. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-071112-221121
397
Lombardi D, Moschella M. The institutional and cultural foundations of the Federal Reserve’s and ECB’s non-standard policies. Stato e Mercato. 2015. doi:10.1425/79495
398
Bernhard W, Broz JL, Clark WR. The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions. International Organization 2002;56:693–723. doi:10.1162/002081802760403748
399
Scheve K. Public Inflation Aversion and the Political Economy of Macroeconomic Policymaking. International Organization 2004;58. doi:10.1017/S0020818304581018
400
Goodman JB. The Politics of Central Bank Independence. Comparative Politics 1991;23. doi:10.2307/422090
401
Crowe C, Meade EE. The Evolution of Central Bank Governance around the World. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2007;21:69–90. doi:10.1257/jep.21.4.69
402
Bernhard W. A Political Explanation of Variations in Central Bank Independence. The American Political Science Review 1998;92. doi:10.2307/2585666
403
Polillo S, Guillén MF. Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence1. American Journal of Sociology 2005;110:1764–802. doi:10.1086/428685
404
Marcussen M. Central banks on the move. Journal of European Public Policy 2005;12:903–23. doi:10.1080/13501760500161597
405
Cukierman A. Monetary policy and institutions before, during, and after the global financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability 2013;9:373–84. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2013.02.002
406
Adolph C. Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506762
407
Hall PA, Franzese RJ. Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage Bargaining, and European Monetary Union. International Organization 1998;52:505–35. doi:10.1162/002081898550644
408
Clark WR, Arel-Bundock V. Independent but Not Indifferent: Partisan Bias in Monetary Policy at the Fed. Economics & Politics 2013;25:1–26. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12006
409
King M. Epistemic Communities and the Diffusion of Ideas: Central Bank Reform in the United Kingdom. West European Politics 2005;28:94–123. doi:10.1080/0140238042000297107
410
Cukierman A, Web SB, Neyapti B. Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review 1992;6:353–98. doi:10.1093/wber/6.3.353
411
Elgie R. The politics of the European Central Bank: principal-agent theory and the democratic deficit. Journal of European Public Policy 2002;9:186–200. doi:10.1080/13501760110120219
412
McNamara KR. The currency of ideas: monetary politics in the European Union. Pbk. ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1999.
413
Lohmann S. Federalism and Central bank Independence: The Politics of German Monetary Policy, 1957–92. World Politics 1998;50:401–46. doi:10.1017/S0043887100012867
414
Broz JL. The Origins of Central Banking: Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem. International Organization 1998;52:231–68. doi:10.1162/002081898753162811
415
Quaglia L. An Integrative Approach to the Politics of Central Bank Independence: Lessons from Britain, Germany and Italy. West European Politics 2005;28:549–68. doi:10.1080/01402380500085798
416
Chang KH. Appointing Central Bankers: The Politics of Monetary Policy in the United States and the European Monetary Union. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510526
417
The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review 2003;97:407–23. doi:10.1017.S0003055403000777
418
Mukherjee B, Singer DA. Monetary Institutions, Partisanship, and Inflation Targeting. International Organization 2008;62. doi:10.1017/S0020818308080119
419
Broz JL. Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. International Organization 2002;56:861–87. doi:10.1162/002081802760403801
420
Posen A. Declarations Are Not Enough: Financial Sector Sources of Central Bank Independence. 1995;:253–74.http://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/nbrnberch/11021.htm
421
Hallerberg M. Veto Players and the Choice of Monetary Institutions. International Organization 2002;56:775–802. doi:10.1162/002081802760403775
422
WAY C. Central Banks, Partisan Politics, and Macroeconomic Outcomes. Comparative Political Studies 2000;33:196–224. doi:10.1177/0010414000033002002
423
Frieden J. Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organization 1991;45:425–51.http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2706944?uid=3738032&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21102569325157
424
Frieden JA. Real Sources of European Currency Policy: Sectoral Interests and European Monetary Integration. International Organization 2002;56:831–60. doi:10.1162/002081802760403793
425
Bodea C. Independent central banks, regime type, and fiscal performance: the case of post-communist countries. Public Choice 2013;155:81–107. doi:10.1007/s11127-011-9843-6
426
Jeong G-H, Miller GJ, Sobel AC. Political Compromise and Bureaucratic Structure: The Political Origins of the Federal Reserve System. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2009;25:472–98. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewn010
427
Verdun A. The Institutional Design of EMU: A Democratic Deficit? Journal of Public Policy 1998;18:107–32.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4007626?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
428
Quaglia L, Taylor & Francis. Central banking governance in the European Union: a comparative analysis. London: : Routledge 2008. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203932803
429
Lombardi D, Moschella M. The government bond buying programmes of the European Central Bank: an analysis of their policy settings. Journal of European Public Policy 2015;:1–20. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1069374
430
Arnone M, Laurens BJ, Segalotto J-F. Measures of Central Bank Autonomy: Empirical Evidence for OECD, Developing, and Emerging Market Economies. ;WP/06/228.https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp06228.pdf
431
Davies H, Davies H, Green D. Banking on the future: the fall and rise of central banking. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=557127
432
Braun B. Governing the future: the European Central Bank’s expectation management during the Great Moderation. Economy and Society 2015;44:367–91. doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1049447
433
Broz L. The Federal Reserve as global lender of last resort, 2007-2010. Published Online First: 2015.http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60951/
434
Bodea C, Hicks R. Price Stability and Central Bank Independence: Discipline, Credibility, and Democratic Institutions. International Organization 2014;:1–27. doi:10.1017/S0020818314000277
435
Schwartz HM. Banking on the FED: QE1-2-3 and the Rebalancing of the Global Economy. New Political Economy 2015;:1–23. doi:10.1080/13563467.2015.1041480
436
Dobler M, Gray S, Murphy D, et al. The Lender of Last Resort Function after the Global Financial Crisis. ;WP/16/10.http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/wp1610.pdf
437
WAY C. Central Banks, Partisan Politics, and Macroeconomic Outcomes. Comparative Political Studies 2000;33:196–224. doi:10.1177/0010414000033002002
438
Bodea C, Higashijima M. Central Bank Independence and Fiscal Policy: Can the Central Bank Restrain Deficit Spending? British Journal of Political Science 2015;:1–24. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000058
439
Belke A, Potrafke N. Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance 2012;31:1126–39. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.014
440
Lepers E. The Neutrality Illusion: Biased Economics, Biased Training, and Biased Monetary Policy. Testing the Role of Ideology on FOMC Voting Behaviour. New Political Economy 2017;:1–23. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1332019
441
Goodhart C, Lastra R. Populism and Central Bank Independence. Open Economies Review 2018;29:49–68. doi:10.1007/s11079-017-9447-y
442
Jacobs LR, King D. The Fed’s Political Economy. PS: Political Science & Politics 2018;:1–5. doi:10.1017/S1049096518000884
443
Adolph C. The Missing Politics of Central Banks. PS: Political Science & Politics 2018;:1–6. doi:10.1017/S1049096518000847
444
Pontusson J. The Fed, Finance, and Inequality in Comparative Perspective. PS: Political Science & Politics 2018;:1–4. doi:10.1017/S1049096518000860
445
Binder S, Spindel M. Why Study Monetary Politics? PS: Political Science & Politics 2018;:1–5. doi:10.1017/S1049096518000835
446
Braun B. Speaking to the people? Money, trust, and central bank legitimacy in the age of quantitative easing. Review of International Political Economy 2016;23:1064–92. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1252415
447
Johnson J, Arel-Bundock V, Portniaguine V. Adding Rooms onto a House We Love: Central Banking after the Global Financial Crisis. Public Administration Published Online First: 26 October 2018. doi:10.1111/padm.12567
448
de Haan J, Eijffinger S. The politics of central bank independence. Published Online First: 2016.https://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/Working%20paper%20539_tcm47-350814.pdf
449
Alesina A, Stella A. The Politics of Monetary Policy. Published Online First: 2010.https://www.nber.org/papers/w15856.pdf
450
Alesina A, Stella A. The Politics of Monetary Policy. In: Handbook of Monetary Economics: Vols. 3A & 3B, Set. San Diego: : North Holland [Imprint] 1001–54. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53454-5.00006-2
451
Belke A, Potrafke N. Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance 2012;31:1126–39. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.014
452
Crowe C. Goal independent central banks: Why politicians decide to delegate. European Journal of Political Economy 2008;24:748–62. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.05.002
453
Keefer P, Stasavage D. The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review 2003;97. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000777
454
Dumiter FC. Central Bank Independence, Transparency and Accountability Indexes: a Survey. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business 2014;7:35–54. doi:10.2478/tjeb-2014-0002
455
Garriga AC. Central Bank Independence in the World: A New Data Set. International Interactions 2016;42:849–68. doi:10.1080/03050629.2016.1188813
456
Vaubel R. The bureaucratic and partisan behavior of independent central banks: German and international evidence. European Journal of Political Economy 1997;13:201–24. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00004-9
457
Giesenow FM, de Haan J. The influence of government ideology on monetary policy: New cross-country evidence based on dynamic heterogeneous panels. Economics & Politics Published Online First: 10 January 2019. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12126
458
Kaya A, Golub S, Kuperberg M, et al. The Federal Reserve’s Dual Mandate and the Inflation-Unemployment Tradeoff. Contemporary Economic Policy Published Online First: 20 February 2019. doi:10.1111/coep.12422
459
McPhilemy S, Moschella M. Central Banks under stress Reputation, Accountability and Regulatory Coherence. Public Administration Published Online First: 23 May 2019. doi:10.1111/padm.12606
460
Reisenbichler A. The politics of quantitative easing and housing stimulus by the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank, 2008‒2018. West European Politics 2019;:1–21. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1612160
461
Giesenow FM, de Haan J. The influence of government ideology on monetary policy: New cross-country evidence based on dynamic heterogeneous panels. Economics & Politics 2019;31:216–39. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12126
462
Baldwin R, Cave M, Lodge M, et al. The Oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F34523
463
Baldwin R, Cave M, Lodge M, et al. The Oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F34523
464
Webb Yackee S. The Politics of Rulemaking in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 2019;22. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050817-092302
465
Baldwin R, Cave M, Lodge M. Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=829488
466
Baldwin R, Cave M, Lodge M. Regulatory Strategies (Chapter 7). In: Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford University Press, USA 2011. 105–36.
467
Thatcher M. Regulation after delegation: independent regulatory agencies in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 2002;9:954–72. doi:10.1080/1350176022000046445
468
Majone G. From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy 1997;17. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003524
469
Vogel SK. Freer markets, more rules: regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1996. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstor.org%2Fstable%2F10.7591%2Fj.ctv1nhm3h
470
Vogel D. Chapter 1. Understanding Regulatory Reform. In: Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1995. 9–24.
471
Levi-Faur D. The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2005;598:12–32. doi:10.1177/0002716204272371
472
Thatcher M. Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics 2002;25:125–47. doi:10.1080/713601588
473
Gilardi F. The Same, But Different: Central Banks, Regulatory Agencies, and the Politics of Delegation to Independent Authorities. Comparative European Politics 2007;5:303–27. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110098
474
Carpenter D, Moss DA, editors. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565875
475
Carpenter D, Moss DA, editors. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565875
476
Carrigan C, Coglianese C. The Politics of Regulation: From New Institutionalism to New Governance. Annual Review of Political Science 2011;14:107–29. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.032408.171344
477
Majone G. From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy 1997;17. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003524
478
Baldwin R, Baldwin R, Cave M, et al. Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=829488
479
Gilardi F. Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: a comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 2002;9:873–93. doi:10.1080/1350176022000046409
480
Hancké B, Rhodes M, Thatcher M. Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=CityUniLon&isbn=9780191525681
481
Gandrud C. The diffusion of financial supervisory governance ideas. Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:881–916. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.727362
482
Stigler GJ. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 1971;2. doi:10.2307/3003160
483
Peltzman S. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. The Journal of Law and Economics 1976;19:211–40. doi:10.1086/466865
484
Reed KK. A Look at Firm--Regulator Exchanges: Friendly Enough or Too Friendly? Business & Society 2009;48:147–78. doi:10.1177/0007650308316525
485
Moran M. Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State. British Journal of Political Science 2002;32:391–413. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000169
486
Gilardi F. The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2005;598:84–101. doi:10.1177/0002716204271833
487
Jordana J, Levi-Faur D, i Marin XF. The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies: Channels of Transfer and Stages of Diffusion. Comparative Political Studies 2011;44:1343–69. doi:10.1177/0010414011407466
488
Braithwaite J, Drahos P. Global business regulation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
489
Levi-Faur D Sharon Gilad, Gilad S. The Rise of the British Regulatory State: Transcending the Privatization Debate. Comparative Politics 2004;37:105–24.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4150126?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
490
Moe TM. Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB. The American Political Science Review 1985;79. doi:10.2307/1956250
491
Dal Bo E. Regulatory Capture: A Review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2006;22:203–25. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grj013
492
Becker GS. A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1983;98. doi:10.2307/1886017
493
Elgie R, McMenamin I. Credible Commitment, Political Uncertainty or Policy Complexity? Explaining Variations in the Independence of Non-majoritarian Institutions in France. British Journal of Political Science 2005;35:531–48. doi:10.1017/S0007123405000281
494
Guidi M. Delegation and varieties of capitalism: Explaining the independence of national competition agencies in the European Union. Comparative European Politics 2014;12:343–65. doi:10.1057/cep.2013.6
495
Hanretty C, Koop C. Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies. Regulation & Governance 2013;7:195–214. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x
496
Maggetti M. De facto independence after delegation: A fuzzy-set analysis. Regulation & Governance 2007;1:271–94. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00023.x
497
Carpenter DP. Protection without Capture: Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator. American Political Science Review 2004;98. doi:10.1017/S0003055404041383
498
Baxter L. Capture in Financial Regulation: Can We Redirect It Toward the Common Good? Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy Published Online First: 2011.http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2355/
499
Majone G. The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics 1994;17:77–101. doi:10.1080/01402389408425031
500
Thatcher M. Regulatory agencies, the state and markets: a Franco-British comparison. Journal of European Public Policy 2007;14:1028–47. doi:10.1080/13501760701576510
501
McCubbins MD, Schwartz T. Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 1984;28:165–79.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110792?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
502
Guardiancich I, Guidi M. Formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: A case of institutional complementarity? Regulation & Governance 2015;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/rego.12080
503
Fernández-i-Marín X, Jordana J. The emergence of regulatory regionalism: transnational networks and the diffusion of regulatory agencies within regions. Contemporary Politics 2015;:1–18. doi:10.1080/13569775.2015.1010776
504
Ennser-Jedenastik L. Credibility Versus Control: Agency Independence and Partisan Influence in the Regulatory State. Comparative Political Studies 2015;48:823–53. doi:10.1177/0010414014558259
505
Ennser-Jedenastik L. The Politicization of Regulatory Agencies: Between Partisan Influence and Formal Independence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2016;26:507–18. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv022
506
Guardiancich I, Guidi M. Formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: A case of institutional complementarity? Regulation & Governance 2016;10:211–29. doi:10.1111/rego.12080
507
Ennser-Jedenastik L. Do parties matter in delegation? Partisan preferences and the creation of regulatory agencies in Europe. Regulation & Governance 2016;10:193–210. doi:10.1111/rego.12072
508
Abbott KW, Levi-faur D, Snidal D. Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2017;670:14–35. doi:10.1177/0002716216688272
509
Hanretty C, Koop C. Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies. Regulation & Governance 2013;7:195–214. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x
510
Pavón Mediano A. Agencies’ formal independence and credible commitment in the Latin American regulatory state: A comparative analysis of 8 countries and 13 sectors. Regulation & Governance Published Online First: 15 February 2018. doi:10.1111/rego.12187
511
Eckert S. Two spheres of regulation: Balancing social and economic goals. Regulation & Governance 2018;12:177–91. doi:10.1111/rego.12137
512
Malhotra N, Monin B, Tomz M. Does Private Regulation Preempt Public Regulation? American Political Science Review 2018;:1–19. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000679
513
Smith MG, Urpelainen J. Windows of opportunity: legislative fragmentation conditions the effect of partisanship on product market deregulation. Journal of Public Policy 2016;36:51–86. doi:10.1017/S0143814X14000300
514
Lodge M. Regulation, the Regulatory State and European Politics. West European Politics 2008;31:280–301. doi:10.1080/01402380701835074
515
Thatcher M. Analysing regulatory reform in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 2002;9:859–72. doi:10.1080/1350176022000046391
516
Thelen K. Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics 2018;16:938–53. doi:10.1017/S1537592718001081
517
Milner HV. The Political Economy of International Trade. Annual Review of Political Science 1999;2:91–114. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.91
518
MARGALIT Y. Lost in Globalization: International Economic Integration and the Sources of Popular Discontent1. International Studies Quarterly 2012;56:484–500. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00747.x
519
Berger S. Globalization and Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2000;3:43–62. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.43
520
Brune N, Garrett G. The globalization Rorschac Test: International Economic Integration, Inequality, and the Role of Government. Annual Review of Political Science 2005;8:399–423. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085727
521
Rodrik D. Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy 1998;106:997–1032. doi:10.1086/250038
522
Rudra N, Haggard S. Globalization, Democracy, and Effective Welfare Spending in the Developing World. Comparative Political Studies 2005;38:1015–49. doi:10.1177/0010414005279258
523
Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G, et al. Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure. Published Online First: 2016.http://www.ddorn.net/papers/ADHM-PoliticalPolarization.pdf
524
KIM IS. Political Cleavages within Industry: Firm-level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization. American Political Science Review 2017;111:1–20. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000654
525
Rho S, Tomz M. Why Don’t Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest? International Organization 2017;71:S85–108. doi:10.1017/S0020818316000394
526
Baker A. Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 2005;49:924–38. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00164.x
527
Beaulieu E, Benarroch M, Gaisford JD. Intra-industry Trade Liberalization: Why Skilled Workers are More Likely to Support Free Trade. Review of International Economics 2011;19:579–94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2011.00967.x
528
Dean A. From conflict to coalition: profit-sharing institutions and the political economy of trade. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2016. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316717592
529
Walter S. Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly 2010;54:403–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00593.x
530
Hwang W, Lee H. Globalization, Factor Mobility, Partisanship, and Compensation Policies. International Studies Quarterly 2014;58:92–105. doi:10.1111/isqu.12070
531
Owen E, Johnston NP. Occupation and the Political Economy of Trade: Job Routineness, Offshorability, and Protectionist Sentiment. International Organization 2017;:1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000339
532
Borges FA. Debating Trade: The Legislative Politics of Free Trade Agreements in Latin America. Government and Opposition 2017;:1–29. doi:10.1017/gov.2017.28
533
Mansfield ED, Mutz DC. Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety. International Organization 2009;63:425–57. doi:10.1017/S0020818309090158
534
Rode M, Sáenz de Viteri A. Expressive attitudes to compensation: The case of globalization. European Journal of Political Economy 2018;54:42–55. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.05.007
535
Mansfield ED, Milner HV, Pevehouse JC. Vetoing Co-operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science 2007;37. doi:10.1017/S0007123407000221
536
Mutz DC, Kim E. The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences. International Organization 2017;71:827–50. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000327
537
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
538
Overbeek H, Apeldoorn B van, Nölke A. The transnational politics of corporate governance regulation. London: : Routledge 2007. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https://eresources.city.ac.uk/oala/metadata&redirectUri=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203946688
539
Davis GF, Kim S. Financialization of the Economy. Annual Review of Sociology 2015;41:203–21. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112402
540
Lazonick W, O’Sullivan M. Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society 2000;29:13–35. doi:10.1080/030851400360541
541
Morgan G, Oxford Handbooks Online. The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F34531
542
Hall PA, Soskice DW. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2001. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=3052699
543
Roe MJ. Political determinants of corporate governance: political context, corporate impact. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
544
Clift B. Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Second edition. London: : Macmillan International Higher Education 2021.
545
Callaghan H. Insiders, Outsiders, and the Politics of Corporate Governance: How Ownership Structure Shapes Party Positions in Britain, Germany, and France. Comparative Political Studies 2009;42:733–62. doi:10.1177/0010414008329895
546
Hardie I, Howarth D, Maxfield S, et al. Banks and the False Dichotomy in the Comparative Political Economy of Finance. World Politics 2013;65:691–728. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000221
547
Cioffi JW, Hopner M. The Political Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Interests, Preferences, and Center-Left Party Politics in Corporate Governance Reform. Politics & Society 2006;34:463–502. doi:10.1177/0032329206293642
548
Culpepper PD. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760716
549
Culpepper PD. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760716
550
Gourevitch PA, Shinn J, EBL. Political power and corporate control: the new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2005. http://city.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=557133
551
Culpepper PD. Institutional Change in Contemporary Capitalism: Coordinated Financial Systems since 1990. World Politics 2005;57:173–99. doi:10.1353/wp.2005.0016
552
Martin Höpner. What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review 2005;3:331–58. doi:10.1093/SER/mwi014
553
Callaghan H, Höpner M. European Integration and the Clash of Capitalisms: Political Cleavages over Takeover Liberalization. Comparative European Politics 2005;3:307–32. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110061
554
Beyer J, Hoppner M. The disintegration of organised capitalism: German corporate governance in the 1990s. West European Politics 2003;26:179–98. doi:10.1080/01402380312331280738
555
Horn L. Regulating corporate governance in the EU: Towards a marketization of corporate control. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2F10.1057%2F9780230356405
556
Höpner M. Corporate Governance Reform and the German Party Paradox. Comparative Politics 2007;39:401–20.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20434052?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
557
Cioffi JW, Hopner M. The Political Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Interests, Preferences, and Center-Left Party Politics in Corporate Governance Reform. Politics & Society 2006;34:463–502. doi:10.1177/0032329206293642
558
O’Sullivan M. The political economy of comparative corporate governance. Review of International Political Economy 2003;10:23–72. doi:10.1080/0969229032000048899
559
Cioffi JW. The Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact. The American Journal of Comparative Law 2004;52. doi:10.2307/4144483
560
Allen F, Gale D. Comparing financial systems. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2000. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27227&authtype=shib&custid=s1089299
561
Roe MJ. Political Preconditions to Separating Ownership from Corporate Control. Stanford Law Review 2000;53:539–606.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229469?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
562
Alvarez I. Financialization, non-financial corporations and income inequality: the case of France. Socio-Economic Review 2015;13:449–75. doi:10.1093/ser/mwv007
563
Callaghan H. Who cares about financialization? Self-reinforcing feedback, issue salience, and increasing acquiescence to market-enabling takeover rules. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 17 February 2015. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu037
564
Hall PA, Soskice DW. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2001. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/city/detail.action?docID=3052699
565
Pontusson J, Rueda D, Way C. Comparative Political Economy of Wage Distribution: The Role of Partisanship and Labour Market Institutions. British Journal of Political Science 2002;32:281–308. doi:10.1017/S000712340200011X
566
Traxler F, Kittel B. The Bargaining System and Performance: A Comparison of 18 OECD Countries. Comparative Political Studies 2000;33:1154–90. doi:10.1177/0010414000033009003
567
Wallerstein M. Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science 1999;43. doi:10.2307/2991830
568
Rueda D, Pontusson J. Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism. World Politics 2000;52:350–83. doi:10.1017/S0043887100016579
569
Crouch C, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science. Industrial relations and European state traditions. Oxford: : Clarendon 1993. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F10494
570
Baccaro L, Simoni M. Organizational Determinants of Wage Moderation. World Politics 2010;62:594–635. doi:10.1017/S0043887110000201
571
Beck N, Katz JN, Alvarez RM, et al. Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum. The American Political Science Review 1993;87. doi:10.2307/2938825
572
Mares I. Wage Bargaining in the Presence of Social Services and Transfers. World Politics 2004;57:99–142. doi:10.1353/wp.2005.0011
573
Martin CJ, Swank D. Does the Organization of Capital Matter? Employers and Active Labor Market Policy at the National and Firm Levels. American Political Science Review 2004;98. doi:10.1017/S0003055404041371
574
Eichengreen B, Iversen T. Institutions and economic performance: evidence from the labour market. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 1999;15:121–38. doi:10.1093/oxrep/15.4.121
575
Bermeo N. Unemployment in the New Europe. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664151
576
Hessami Z, Baskaran T. Has Globalisation Affected Collective Bargaining? An Empirical Test, 1980-2009. The World Economy 2014;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/twec.12239
577
Emmenegger P. The Politics of Job Security Regulations in Western Europe: From Drift to Layering. Politics & Society Published Online First: 16 December 2014. doi:10.1177/0032329214555099
578
Gordon JC. Protecting the unemployed: varieties of unionism and the evolution of unemployment benefits and active labor market policy in the rich democracies. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 16 October 2014. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu029
579
Knotz C, Lindvall J. Coalitions and Compensation: The Case of Unemployment Benefit Duration. Comparative Political Studies Published Online First: 28 November 2014. doi:10.1177/0010414014556209
580
Darcillon T. How does finance affect labor market institutions? An empirical analysis in 16 OECD countries. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 17 February 2015. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu038
581
Jung J. A struggle on two fronts: labour resistance to changing layoff policies at large US companies. Socio-Economic Review Published Online First: 11 July 2015. doi:10.1093/ser/mwv015
582
Roe MJ, Vatiero M. Corporate Governance and Its Political Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2015. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2588760
583
Mueller DC, Oxford Handbooks Online. The Oxford handbook of capitalism. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/city.ac.uk?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fedited-volume%2F38626
584
van der Zwan N. Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review 2014;12:99–129. doi:10.1093/ser/mwt020
