Bibliography for IP2031: Comparative Political Economy

1.
Lichbach, M.I., Zuckerman, A.S.: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).

2.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

3.
Frieden, J.A.: Global capitalism: its fall and rise in the twentieth century. W.W. Norton, New York (2007).

4.
Wittman, D., Weingast, B.R., Oxford University Press Staff, Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, New York.

5.
Katzenstein, P.J., EBL.: Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1985).

6.
Lichbach, M.I., Zuckerman, A.S.: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).

7.
Knutsen, C.H.: Democracy and economic growth: A survey of arguments and results. International Area Studies Review. 15, 393–415 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865912455268.

8.
Cox, G., McCubbins, M.: ’The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes, http://wcfia.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/671_mccubbins_cox.pdf?m=1427473083, (2001).

9.
Olson, M.: Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review. 87, (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2938736.

10.
North, D.C., Weingast, B.R.: Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History. 49, (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700009451.

11.
Olson, M.: The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven (1982).

12.
Lichbach, M.I., Zuckerman, A.S.: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).

13.
Wittman, D., Weingast, B.R., Oxford University Press Staff, Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, New York.

14.
Quinn, D.P., Woolley, J.T.: Democracy and National Economic Performance: The Preference for Stability. American Journal of Political Science. 45, (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/2669243.

15.
Stasavage, D.: Credible Commitment in Early Modern Europe: North and Weingast Revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 18, 155–186 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/18.1.155.

16.
Engerman, S.L., Sokoloff, K.L.: Debating the Role of Institutions in Political and Economic Development: Theory, History, and Findings*. Annual Review of Political Science. 11, 119–135 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.120406.135217.

17.
Doucouliagos, H., Ulubaşoğlu, M.A.: Democracy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Political Science. 52, 61–83 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00299.x.

18.
North, D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).

19.
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A.: Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Profile, London (2012).

20.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M.E., Cheibub, J.A., Limongi, F.: Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).

21.
Hall, P.A., Taylor, R.C.R.: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 44, 936–957 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.

22.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.A.: Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth, http://economics.mit.edu/files/4469, (2005).

23.
Barry R. Weingast: The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 11, 1–31 (1995).

24.
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F.: Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth. 9, 131–165 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85.

25.
Baum, M.A., Lake, D.A.: The Political Economy of Growth: Democracy and Human Capital. American Journal of Political Science. 47, 333–347 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00023.

26.
Beaulieu, E., Cox, G.W., Saiegh, S.: Sovereign Debt and Regime Type: Reconsidering the Democratic Advantage. International Organization. 66, 709–738 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000288.

27.
Democracy, Autocracy, and Expropriation of Foreign Direct Investment. Comparative Political Studies. 42, 1098–1127 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331723.

28.
Jensen, N.M.: Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization. 57, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303573040.

29.
Schultz, K.A., Weingast, B.R.: The Democratic Advantage: Institutional Foundations of Financial Power in International Competition. International Organization. 57, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303571065.

30.
Gandhi, J.: Dictatorial Institutions and their Impact on Economic Growth. European Journal of Sociology. 49, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975608000015.

31.
Bailey, M.A., Goldstein, J., Weingast, B.R.: The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade. World Politics. 49, 309–338 (1997).

32.
Mansfield, E.D., Milner, H.V., Rosendorff, B.P.: Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. The American Political Science Review. 94, (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/2586014.

33.
Rickard, S.J.: A Non-Tariff Protectionist Bias in Majoritarian Politics: Government Subsidies and Electoral Institutions. International Studies Quarterly. 56, 777–785 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00760.x.

34.
Rickard, S.J.: A Non-Tariff Protectionist Bias in Majoritarian Politics: Government Subsidies and Electoral Institutions. International Studies Quarterly. 56, 777–785 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00760.x.

35.
Rogowski, R.: Trade and the variety of democratic institutions. International Organization. 41, (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027442.

36.
Ehrlich, S.D.: Access to Protection: Domestic Institutions and Trade Policy in Democracies. International Organization. 61, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070191.

37.
Hiscox, M.J.: The Magic Bullet? The RTAA, Institutional Reform, and Trade Liberalization. International Organization. 53, 669–698 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551039.

38.
Wibbels, E.: Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance. American Journal of Political Science. 44, (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/2669275.

39.
Bernhard, W., Leblang, D.: Democratic Institutions and Exchange-rate Commitments. International Organization. 53, 71–97 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550814.

40.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

41.
North, D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).

42.
North, D.C.: Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).

43.
Keech, W.R.: Economic Politics: The Costs of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).

44.
Keech, W.R.: Economic Politics: The Costs of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).

45.
Przeworski, A., Limongi, F.: Political Regimes and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 7, 51–69 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.3.51.

46.
Schumpeter, J.A., Schumpeter, J.A., Stiglitz, J.E.: Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Routledge, London (2010).

47.
Crepaz, M.M.L.: Inclusion versus Exclusion: Political Institutions and Welfare Expenditures. Comparative Politics. 31, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/422106.

48.
Landa, D., Kapstein, E.B.: Inequality, Growth, and Democracy. World Politics. 53, 264–296 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0004.

49.
Knack, S., Keefer, P.: Does Inequality Harm Growth Only in Democracies? A Replication and Extension. American Journal of Political Science. 41, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2111719.

50.
Wright, J.: Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science. 52, 322–343 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00315.x.

51.
Olson, M.: The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press, London.

52.
Olson, M.: The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven (1982).

53.
Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., Thatcher, M.: Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).

54.
Jensen, N.M.: Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization. 57, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303573040.

55.
Sylwester, K.: Does Democracy Increase Growth More in New Countries? Economics & Politics. n/a-n/a (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12055.

56.
Chandra, S., Rudra, N.: Reassessing the Links between Regime Type and Economic Performance: Why Some Authoritarian Regimes Show Stable Growth and Others Do Not. British Journal of Political Science. 45, 253–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000355.

57.
Moon, C.: Foreign Direct Investment, Commitment Institutions, and Time Horizon: How Some Autocrats Do Better than Others. International Studies Quarterly. n/a-n/a (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12182.

58.
Bak, D.: Political Investment Cycles in Democracies and Autocracies. International Interactions. 42, 797–819 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1173547.

59.
Baumgartner, F.R., Carammia, M., Epp, D.A., Noble, B., Rey, B., Yildirim, T.M.: Budgetary change in authoritarian and democratic regimes. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1296482.

60.
Chandra, S., Rudra, N.: Reassessing the Links between Regime Type and Economic Performance: Why Some Authoritarian Regimes Show Stable Growth and Others Do Not. British Journal of Political Science. 45, 253–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000355.

61.
Osterloh, S., Debus, M.: Partisan politics in corporate taxation. European Journal of Political Economy. 28, 192–207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.11.002.

62.
BUSEMEYER, M.R.: From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research. 48, 455–482 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00838.x.

63.
Allan, J.P., Scruggs, L.: Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science. 48, 496–512 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x.

64.
Bermeo, N.: Does Electoral Democracy Boost Economic Equality? Journal of Democracy. 20, 21–35 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0112.

65.
Franzese, R.J.: Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science. 5, 369–421 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112801.080924.

66.
Boix, C.: Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).

67.
Wittman, D., Weingast, B.R., Oxford University Press Staff, Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, New York.

68.
Wittman, D., Weingast, B.R., Oxford University Press Staff, Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, New York.

69.
Leighley, J.E., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2010).

70.
Garrett, G.: Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).

71.
Wittman, D., Weingast, B.R., Oxford University Press Staff, Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, New York.

72.
Boix, C.: Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Nations, 1960–93. World Politics. 53, 38–73 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100009370.

73.
Boix, C.: Political Parties and the Supply Side of the Economy: The Provision of Physical and Human Capital in Advanced Economies, 1960-90. American Journal of Political Science. 41, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2111676.

74.
Boix, C.: Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).

75.
Tufte, E.R.: Political Control of the Economy. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1980).

76.
Hibbs, D.A.: Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review. 71, (1977).

77.
Oatley, T.: How Constraining is Capital Mobility? The Partisan Hypothesis in an Open Economy. American Journal of Political Science. 43, (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/2991815.

78.
Garrett, G., Lange, P.: Political responses to interdependence: what’s "left” for the left? International Organization. 45, (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033208.

79.
KORPI, W., PALME, J.: New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review. 97, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000789.

80.
Garrett, G.: Introduction. In: Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. pp. 1–25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).

81.
Garrett, G.: Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).

82.
Tavitis, M., Letki, N.: When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe. American Political Science Review. 103, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990220.

83.
Hibbs, D.A.: Partisan theory after fifteen years. European Journal of Political Economy. 8, 361–373 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(92)90001-W.

84.
Allan, J.P., Scruggs, L.: Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science. 48, 496–512 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x.

85.
Canes-Wrone, B., Park, J.-K.: Electoral Business Cycles in OECD Countries. American Political Science Review. 106, 103–122 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000529.

86.
Alesina, A., Rosenthal, H.: Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).

87.
Kayser, M.A.: Who Surfs, Who Manipulates? The Determinants of Opportunistic Election Timing and Electorally Motivated Economic Intervention. American Political Science Review. 99, 17–27 (2005).

88.
Scheve, K., Stasavage, D.: Institutions, Partisanship, and Inequality in the Long Run. World Politics. 61, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109000094.

89.
Alvarez, R.M., Garrett, G., Lange, P.: Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance. The American Political Science Review. 85, (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/1963174.

90.
Blais, A., Blake, D., Dion, S.: Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies. American Journal of Political Science. 37, (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2111523.

91.
Blais, A., Blake, D., Dion, S.: Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies. American Journal of Political Science. 37, (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2111523.

92.
Cusack, T.R.: Partisan Politics and Fiscal Policy. Comparative Political Studies. 32, 464–486 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032004003.

93.
Drazen, A.: The Political Business Cycle After 25 Years. NBER Chapters. 75–138.

94.
Clark, W.R., Hallerberg, M.: Mobile Capital, Domestic Institutions, and Electorally Induced Monetary and Fiscal Policy. The American Political Science Review. 94, (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/2586015.

95.
Alesina, A., Roubini, N., Cohen, G.D.: Political cycles and the macroeconomy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1997).

96.
Clark, W.R., Golder, S.N., Poast, P.: Monetary Institutions and the Political Survival of Democratic Leaders. International Studies Quarterly. 57, 556–567 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12013.

97.
Oatley, T.: How Constraining is Capital Mobility? The Partisan Hypothesis in an Open Economy. American Journal of Political Science. 43, (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/2991815.

98.
Camyar, I.: Political Parties, Supply-Side Strategies, and Firms: The Political Micro-Economy of Partisan Politics. The Journal of Politics. 76, 725–739 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000164.

99.
Sáez, L.: The Political Budget Cycle and Subnational Debt Expenditures in Federations: Panel Data Evidence from India. Governance. n/a-n/a (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12130.

100.
Erikson, R.S., Wlezien, C.: Forecasting US Presidential Elections Using Economic and Noneconomic Fundamentals. PS: Political Science & Politics. 47, 313–316 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000092.

101.
Efthyvoulou, G.: Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures. Public Choice. 153, 295–327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9795-x.

102.
Bove, V., Efthyvoulou, G.: Political Cycles in Public Expenditure: Butter vs. Guns. Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series. (2013).

103.
Kim, H., Kwon, C.: The Effects of Fiscal Consolidation and Welfare Composition of Spending on Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from US Gubernatorial Elections between 1978 and 2006. New Political Economy. 20, 228–253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2014.923822.

104.
Krause, G.A.: Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic Expectations. American Journal of Political Science. 41, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2960486.

105.
Weschle, S.: Two types of economic voting: How economic conditions jointly affect vote choice and turnout. Electoral Studies. 34, 39–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.10.007.

106.
Ademmer, E., Dreher, F.: Constraining Political Budget Cycles: Media Strength and Fiscal Institutions in the Enlarged EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 54, 508–524 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12306.

107.
Hellwig, T.: Explaining the salience of left-right ideology in postindustrial democracies: The role of structural economic change. European Journal of Political Research. 47, 687–709 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00778.x.

108.
Pinto, P.M., Weymouth, S.: Partisan Cycles in Offshore Outsourcing: Evidence from U.S. Imports. Economics & Politics. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12078.

109.
Loftis, M.W., Mortensen, P.B.: A new approach to the study of partisan effects on social policy. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1298656.

110.
Healy, A.J., Persson, M., Snowberg, E.: Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey. American Political Science Review. 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000314.

111.
Trein, P., Beckmann, R., Walter, S.: German Voters in Times of Crisis: The Impact of Perceptions and Economic Context on Electoral Behaviour. German Politics. 26, 414–439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2016.1266482.

112.
Dassonneville, R., Hooghe, M.: Economic indicators and electoral volatility: economic effects on electoral volatility in Western Europe, 1950–2013. Comparative European Politics. 15, 919–943 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.3.

113.
JENSEN, C.: Issue compensation and right-wing government social spending. European Journal of Political Research. 49, 282–299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01898.x.

114.
Busemeyer, M.R.: Skills and Inequality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014).

115.
Potrafke, N.: Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004.

116.
Belke, A., Potrafke, N.: Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance. 31, 1126–1139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.014.

117.
CANES-WRONE, B., PARK, J.-K.: Electoral Business Cycles in OECD Countries. American Political Science Review. 106, 103–122 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000529.

118.
Potrafke, N.: Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice. 140, 105–124 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9414-2.

119.
Raess, D., Pontusson, J.: The politics of fiscal policy during economic downturns, 1981-2010. European Journal of Political Research. 54, 1–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12074.

120.
Tavares, J.: Does right or left matter? Cabinets, credibility and fiscal adjustments. Journal of Public Economics. 88, 2447–2468 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.11.001.

121.
Tingley, D.: Donors and domestic politics: Political influences on foreign aid effort. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 50, 40–49 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2009.10.003.

122.
Dellmuth, L.M., Schraff, D., Stoffel, M.F.: Distributive Politics, Electoral Institutions and European Structural and Investment Funding: Evidence from Italy and France. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 55, 275–293 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12433.

123.
Pinto, L.: Like Leaves in the Wind? Economic Conditions and Government Survival in Italy (1946–2015). South European Society and Politics. 1–24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1398626.

124.
Tilley, J., Neundorf, A., Hobolt, S.B.: When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice. The Journal of Politics. 000–000 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1086/694549.

125.
Fortunato, D., Loftis, M.W.: Cabinet Durability and Fiscal Discipline. American Political Science Review. 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000436.

126.
Savage, L.: The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: The return of partisan policy making. Governance. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12354.

127.
Potrafke, N.: Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics. 45, 712–750 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004.

128.
Schmitt, C.: Panel data analysis and partisan variables: how periodization does influence partisan effects. Journal of European Public Policy. 23, 1442–1459 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1091030.

129.
Bremer, B.: The missing left? Economic crisis and the programmatic response of social democratic parties in Europe. Party Politics. 24, 23–38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817740745.

130.
Galasso, V.: The role of political partisanship during economic crises. Public Choice. 158, 143–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-9956-6.

131.
King, G., Rosen, O., Tanner, M., Wagner, A.F.: Ordinary Economic Voting Behavior in the Extraordinary Election of Adolf Hitler. The Journal of Economic History. 68, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050708000788.

132.
Savage, L.: The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: The return of partisan policy making. Governance. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12354.

133.
Dassonneville, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S.: A changing economic vote in Western Europe? Long-term vs. short-term forces. European Political Science Review. 11, 91–108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000231.

134.
Godwin, K., Ainsworth, S.H., Godwin, E.: Lobbying and policymaking: the public pursuit of private interests. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2013).

135.
Falkner, R.: Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).

136.
Colli, F., Kerremans, B.: Searching for influence: interest groups and social movements in the European Union. Journal of European Integration. 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1406882.

137.
Gilens, M., Page, B.I.: Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics. 12, 564–581 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595.

138.
Coen, D., Wilson, G.K., Wilson, G., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of business and government. Oxford University Press, New York (2010).

139.
Vogel, D.: Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom. British Journal of Political Science. 17, (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004841.

140.
Rasmussen, A., Carroll, B.J.: Determinants of Upper-Class Dominance in the Heavenly Chorus: Lessons from European Union Online Consultations. British Journal of Political Science. 44, 445–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000750.

141.
Woll, C.: The power of inaction: bank bailouts in comparison. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2014).

142.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

143.
Lichbach, M.I., Zuckerman, A.S.: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).

144.
Swenson, P.A.: Varieties of Capitalist Interests: Power, Institutions, and the Regulatory Welfare State in the United States and Sweden. Studies in American Political Development. 18, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X0400001X.

145.
Esping-Andersen, G.: Politics without Class: Postindustrial Cleavages in Europe and America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).

146.
Hacker, J.S., Pierson, P.: Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society. 38, 152–204 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210365042.

147.
Fuchs, D., Lederer, M.M.: The Power of Business. Business and Politics. 9, (2008). https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1214.

148.
Culpepper, P.D.: Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era. Business and Politics. 17, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2015-0031.

149.
Bell, S.: The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business. International Studies Quarterly. 56, 661–673 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x.

150.
Culpepper, P.D., Reinke, R.: Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States. Politics & Society. 42, 427–454 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329214547342.

151.
Przeworski, A., Wallerstein, M.: Structural Dependence of the State on Capital. The American Political Science Review. 82, (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/1958056.

152.
Becker, G.S.: A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 98, (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/1886017.

153.
COEN, D.: The European Business Interest and the Nation State: Large-firm Lobbying in the European Union and Member States. Journal of Public Policy. 18, 75–100 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X9800004X.

154.
Rasmussen, A., Carroll, B.J.: Determinants of Upper-Class Dominance in the Heavenly Chorus: Lessons from European Union Online Consultations. British Journal of Political Science. 44, 445–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000750.

155.
Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2016).

156.
Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., EBL.: Lobbying and policy change: who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009).

157.
Levy, D., Aseem Prakash: Bargains Old and New: Multinational Corporations in Global Governance. Business and Politics. 5, (2003).

158.
Siaroff, A.: Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research. 36, 175–205 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00467.

159.
Hicks, A.: National Collective Action and Economic Performance: A Review Article. International Studies Quarterly. 32, (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600624.

160.
Binderkrantz, A.S., Christiansen, P.M.: From classic to modern corporatism. Interest group representation in Danish public committees in 1975 and 2010. Journal of European Public Policy. 22, 1022–1039 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.1000365.

161.
Schmitter, P.C.: The Changing Politics of Organised Interests. West European Politics. 31, 195–210 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701834994.

162.
Eising, R.: The access of business interests to EU institutions: towards élite pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 384–403 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243772.

163.
Olson, M.: The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven (1982).

164.
Olson, M.: The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1971).

165.
Naoi, M., Krauss, E.: Who Lobbies Whom? Special Interest Politics under Alternative Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science. 53, 874–892 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00406.x.

166.
Hall, R., Deardorff, A.: Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review. 100, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062010.

167.
Thelen, K., Fulcher, J., Streeck, W., Swenson, P., Turner, L.: Beyond Corporatism: Toward a New Framework for the Study of Labor in Advanced Capitalism. Comparative Politics. 27, (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/422220.

168.
Halpin, D., Jordan, A.G.: The scale of interest organization in democratic politics: Data and research methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).

169.
Wallerstein, M., Western, B.: Unions in Decline? What Has Changed and Why. Annual Review of Political Science. 3, 355–377 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.355.

170.
Woll, C.: Firm interests: how governments shape business lobbying on global trade. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2008).

171.
Culpepper, P.D.: Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).

172.
Stigler, G.J.: The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 2, (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160.

173.
Michael J. Hiscox: ’Class Versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade. International Organization. 55, 1–46 (2001).

174.
Rogowski, R.: Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. The American Political Science Review. 81, 1121–1137 (1987).

175.
Rogowski, R.: Commerce and coalitions: how trade affects domestic political alignments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1990).

176.
Alt, J.E., Gilligan, M.: The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Action Problems and Domestic Political Institutions. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2, 165–192 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1994.tb00020.x.

177.
Alt, J.E., Carlsen, F., Heum, P., Johansen, K.: Asset Specificity and the Political Behavior of Firms: Lobbying for Subsidies in Norway. International Organization. 53, 99–116 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550823.

178.
Martin, C.J., Swank, D.: The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).

179.
Swank, D.: Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations. The American Political Science Review. 86, (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/1964014.

180.
Vogel, D.: Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom. British Journal of Political Science. 17, (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004841.

181.
Walker, E.T., Rea, C.M.: The Political Mobilization of Firms and Industries. Annual Review of Sociology. 40, 281–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043215.

182.
Culpepper, P.D., Reinke, R.: Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States. Politics & Society. 42, 427–454 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329214547342.

183.
Hall, R., Deardorff, A.: Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review. 100, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062010.

184.
Ademmer, E., Dreher, F.: Constraining Political Budget Cycles: Media Strength and Fiscal Institutions in the Enlarged EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 54, 508–524 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12306.

185.
De Bruycker, I.: Pressure and Expertise: Explaining the Information Supply of Interest Groups in EU Legislative Lobbying. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 54, 599–616 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12298.

186.
Bell, S., Hindmoor, A.: Structural Power and the Politics of Bank Capital Regulation in the United Kingdom. Political Studies. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716629479.

187.
Woll, C.: Politics in the Interest of Capital: A Not-So-Organized Combat. Politics & Society. 44, 373–391 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216655318.

188.
Chalmers, A.W.: When Banks Lobby: The Effects of Organizational Characteristics and Banking Regulations on International Bank Lobbying. Business and Politics. 19, 107–134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2016.7.

189.
Hofman, A., Aalbers, M.B.: Spaces of lobbying. Geography Compass. 11, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12309.

190.
Kastner, L.: From Outsiders to Insiders: A Civil Society Perspective on EU Financial Reforms. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12644.

191.
Dür, A., Mateo, G.: Public opinion and interest group influence: how citizen groups derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Journal of European Public Policy. 21, 1199–1217 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.900893.

192.
Bell, S.: The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business. International Studies Quarterly. 56, 661–673 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x.

193.
Fairfield, T.: Structural power in comparative political economy: perspectives from policy formulation in Latin America. Business and Politics. 17, 411–441 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2014-0047.

194.
Giger, N., Klüver, H.: Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation. American Journal of Political Science. 60, 190–205 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12183.

195.
Evans, A.: The politics of pro-worker reforms. Socio-Economic Review. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/mwy042.

196.
Beyers, J., Braun, C.: Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers. Journal of Public Policy. 34, 93–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X13000263.

197.
Woll, C.: Leading the Dance? Power and Political Resources of Business Lobbyists. Journal of Public Policy. 27, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000633.

198.
Jackson, G., Deeg, R.: How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity, http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp06-2.pdf, (2006).

199.
Witt, M.A., Redding, G.: Asian business systems: institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review. 11, 265–300 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwt002.

200.
Feldmann, M.: Global Varieties of Capitalism. World Politics. 71, 162–196 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887118000230.

201.
Morgan, G., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).

202.
Hall, P.A., Soskice, D.W.: Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).

203.
Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., Thatcher, M.: Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).

204.
Overbeek, H., Apeldoorn, B. van: Neoliberalism in crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).

205.
Katzenstein, P.J.: Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (1985).

206.
Hall, P.A., Thelen, K.: Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review. 7, 7–34 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn020.

207.
Hall, P.A., Gingerich, D.W.: Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science. 39, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409000672.

208.
Howell, C.: Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One? Comparative Politics. 36, 103–124 (2003).

209.
Thelen, K.: Varieties of Capitalism: Trajectories of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Annual Review of Political Science. 15, 137–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-070110-122959.

210.
Crouch, C.: Capitalist diversity and change: recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).

211.
Thelen, K.: How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).

212.
Streeck, W., Yamamura, Kμ.: The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (2001).

213.
Thatcher, M.: Varieties of Capitalism in an Internationalized World: Domestic Institutional Change in European Telecommunications. Comparative Political Studies. 37, 751–780 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004266868.

214.
Berger, S., Dore, R.: National diversity and global capitalism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, [N.Y.] (1996).

215.
Deeg, R., Jackson, G.: Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review. 5, 149–179 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl021.

216.
Carney, R.W.: Chinese Capitalism in the OECD Mirror. New Political Economy. 14, 71–99 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460802673309.

217.
Carlin, W., Soskice, D.: German economic performance: disentangling the role of supply-side reforms, macroeconomic policy and coordinated economy institutions. Socio-Economic Review. 7, 67–99 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn021.

218.
Feldmann, M.: Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries: Industrial Relations and Wage Bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia. Comparative Political Studies. 39, 829–854 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006288261.

219.
Nölke, A., Vliegenthart, A.: Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe. World Politics. 61, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098.

220.
Schneider, B.R.: Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies. 41, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X09990186.

221.
Streeck, W.: E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism, http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp10-12.pdf, (2010).

222.
Soederberg, S., Menz, G., Cerny, P.G.: Internalizing globalization: The rise of neoliberalism and the decline of national varieties of capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2005).

223.
Nölke, A.: International financial regulation and domestic coalitions in state-permeated capitalism: China and global banking rules. International Politics. 52, 743–759 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.17.

224.
Storz, C., Amable, B., Casper, S., Lechevalier, S.: Bringing Asia into the comparative capitalism perspective. Socio-Economic Review. 11, 217–232 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwt004.

225.
Cusack, T.R., Iversen, T., Soskice, D.: Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems. American Political Science Review. 101, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070384.

226.
Allen, M.: The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety? Socio-Economic Review. 2, 87–108 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/2.1.87.

227.
Wood, G., Dibben, P., Ogden, S.: Comparative Capitalism without Capitalism, and Production without Workers: The Limits and Possibilities of Contemporary Institutional Analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews. 16, 384–396 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12025.

228.
McNally, C.A.: Sino-Capitalism: China’s Reemergence and the International Political Economy. World Politics. 64, 741–776 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887112000202.

229.
Darcillon, T.: How does finance affect labor market institutions? An empirical analysis in 16 OECD countries. Socio-Economic Review. 13, 477–504 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu038.

230.
Piore, M.J.: Varieties of Capitalism Theory: Its Considerable Limits. Politics & Society. 44, 237–241 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216638059.

231.
Schneider, M.R., Paunescu, M.: Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: a test of the Hall and Soskice claims. Socio-Economic Review. 10, 731–753 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr038.

232.
Farkas, B.: Models of capitalism in the European Union: post-crisis perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2016).

233.
Farkas, B.: The Central and Eastern European model of capitalism. Post-Communist Economies. 23, 15–34 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2011.546972.

234.
Hall, P.A.: Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis. Journal of European Public Policy. 25, 7–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310278.

235.
Casey, T.: Mapping stability and change in advanced capitalisms. Comparative European Politics. 7, 255–278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.19.

236.
Hay, C.: Does capitalism (still) come in varieties? Review of International Political Economy. 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1633382.

237.
Hall, P.A.: Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics. 25, (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/422246.

238.
Schmidt, V.A., Thatcher, M. eds: Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

239.
Farrell, H., Quiggin, J.: Consensus, Dissensus and Economic Ideas: The Rise and Fall of Keynesianism During the Economic Crisis, http://www.henryfarrell.net/Keynes.pdf, (2012).

240.
Lichbach, M.I., Zuckerman, A.S.: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).

241.
Widmaier, W.: The power of economic ideas – through, over and in – political time: the construction, conversion and crisis of the neoliberal order in the US and UK. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–19 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115890.

242.
Schmidt, V.A., Thatcher, M. eds: Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

243.
Hall, P.A., Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on States and Social Structures: The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1989).

244.
Blyth, M.: Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).

245.
Blyth, M.: The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change. World Politics. 54, 1–26 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0020.

246.
Blyth, M.M.: ‘Any More Bright Ideas?’ The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy. Comparative Politics. 29, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/422082.

247.
Finnemore, M., Sikkink, K.: Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 4, 391–416 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.

248.
Blyth, M.: Paradigms and Paradox: The Politics of Economic Ideas in Two Moments of Crisis. Governance. 26, 197–215 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12010.

249.
Blyth, M., EBL.: Austerity: the history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y. (2013).

250.
Ban, C., Blyth, M.: The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 241–255 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.779374.

251.
Ferchen, M.: Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 390–420 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.660184.

252.
Mukherji, R.: Ideas, interests, and the tipping point: Economic change in India. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 363–389 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.716371.

253.
Ban, C.: Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism: New paradigm or edited orthodoxy? Review of International Political Economy. 20, 298–331 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.660183.

254.
Babb, S.: The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 268–297 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.640435.

255.
Blyth, M.: Austerity as ideology: A reply to my critics. Comparative European Politics. 11, 737–751 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.25.

256.
Campbell, J.L., Pedersen, O.K.: Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Socio-Economic Review. 13, 679–701 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv004.

257.
Culpepper, P.D.: The Politics of Common Knowledge: Ideas and Institutional Change in Wage Bargaining. International Organization. 62, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080016.

258.
Jacobsen, J.K.: Much Ado About Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy. World Politics. 47, 283–310 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100016117.

259.
McNamara, K.R.: The currency of ideas: monetary politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (1999).

260.
Abdelal, R., Blyth, M., Parsons, C.: Constructing the international economy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (2010).

261.
Abdelal, R., Blyth, M., Parsons, C.: Constructing the international economy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY (2010).

262.
Crouch, C., EBL.: Strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Polity Press, Cambridge (2013).

263.
Peter M. Haas: Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization. 46, 1–35 (1992).

264.
SCHMIDT, V.A.: Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment? Comparative Political Studies. 35, 168–193 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002.

265.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

266.
Blyth, M.: The new Ideas scholarship in the mirror of historical institutionalism: a case of old whines in new bottles? Journal of European Public Policy. 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1118292.

267.
Matthijs, M.: Powerful rules governing the euro: the perverse logic of German ideas. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115535.

268.
Carstensen, M.B., Schmidt, V.A.: Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534.

269.
Morrison, J.A.: Shocking Intellectual Austerity: The Role of Ideas in the Demise of the Gold Standard in Britain. International Organization. 1–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000314.

270.
Helgadóttir, O.: The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1106573.

271.
Rodrik, D.: When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 28, 189–208 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.1.189.

272.
Béland, D., Cox, R.H., Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science: Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, [England] (2011).

273.
Appel, H., Orenstein, M.A.: Why did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World? Comparative Politics. 48, 313–331 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5129/001041516818254419.

274.
Stirling, A., Laybourn-Langton, L.: Time for a New Paradigm? Past and Present Transitions in Economic Policy. The Political Quarterly. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12415.

275.
Hopkin, J., Rosamond, B.: Post-truth Politics, Bullshit and Bad Ideas: ‘Deficit Fetishism’ in the UK. New Political Economy. 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1373757.

276.
Christensen, J., Ebook Central: The power of economists within the state. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California (2017).

277.
Morrison, J.A.: Shocking Intellectual Austerity: The Role of Ideas in the Demise of the Gold Standard in Britain. International Organization. 70, 175–207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000314.

278.
Bremer, B., McDaniel, S.: The ideational foundations of social democratic austerity in the context of the great recession. Socio-Economic Review. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz001.

279.
Salverda, W., Nolan, B., Smeeding, T.M., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of economic inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).

280.
Boix, C., Stokes, S.C., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, New York.

281.
Pierson, P.: The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics. 48, 143–179 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0004.

282.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: Principles of comparative politics. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California (2018).

283.
Rudra, N.: Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).

284.
Esping-Andersen, G.: The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity, Cambridge (1990).

285.
Garrett, G.: Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle? International Organization. 52, 787–824 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550752.

286.
Scheve, K.: Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 1, 255–286 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00005052.

287.
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B.: Why Doesn’t The US Have A European-Style Welfare State?, http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/glaeser/files/why_doesnt_the_u.s._have_a_european-style_welfare_state.pdf, (2011).

288.
Iversen, T., Cusack, T.R.: The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization? World Politics. 52, 313–349 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100016567.

289.
Cusack, T., Iversen, T., Rehm, P.: Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 22, 365–389 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj022.

290.
Lichbach, M.I., Zuckerman, A.S.: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).

291.
Boix, C.: Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).

292.
Cusack, T.R.: Partisan Politics and Fiscal Policy. Comparative Political Studies. 32, 464–486 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032004003.

293.
Iversen, T., Soskice, D.: Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review. 100, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062083.

294.
Iversen, T.: Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).

295.
Whitten, G.D., Williams, L.K.: Buttery Guns and Welfare Hawks: The Politics of Defense Spending in Advanced Industrial Democracies. American Journal of Political Science. 55, 117–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00479.x.

296.
Lupu, N., Pontusson, J.: The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution. American Political Science Review. 105, 316–336 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000128.

297.
Iversen, T., Soskice, D.: Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century. World Politics. 61, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388710900015X.

298.
Bartels, L.M.: Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics. 3, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050036.

299.
Ross, F.: Cutting Public Expenditures in Advanced Industrial Democracies: The Importance of Avoiding Blame. Governance. 10, 175–200 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.361997036.

300.
Quinn, D.P., Shapiro, R.Y.: Business Political Power: The Case of Taxation. The American Political Science Review. 85, (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/1963853.

301.
Moene, K.O., Wallerstein, M.: Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending: A Disaggregated Analysis. World Politics. 55, 485–516 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0022.

302.
Hicks, A., Kenworthy, L.: Varieties of welfare capitalism. Socio-Economic Review. 1, 27–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.1.27.

303.
Swenson, P., Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science: Capitalists against markets: the making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. Oxford University Press, New York (2002).

304.
Giger, N., Nelson, M.: The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research. 50, 1–23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01922.x.

305.
Mares, I.: The Sources of Business Interest in Social Insurance: Sectoral versus National Differences. World Politics. 55, 229–258 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0012.

306.
Rehm, P., Hacker, J.S., Schlesinger, M.: Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State. American Political Science Review. 106, 386–406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000147.

307.
Swank, D., Martin, C.J.: Employers and the Welfare State: The Political Economic Organization of Firms and Social Policy in Contemporary Capitalist Democracies. Comparative Political Studies. 34, 889–923 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034008003.

308.
Clayton, R., Pontusson, J.: Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies. World Politics. 51, 67–98 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007796.

309.
Korpi, W.: Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. World Politics. 58, 167–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0026.

310.
Paster, T.: Business and Welfare State Development: Why Did Employers Accept Social Reforms? World Politics. 65, 416–451 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887113000117.

311.
Mares, I., Carnes, M.E.: Social Policy in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Political Science. 12, 93–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.071207.093504.

312.
Pierson, P., ebrary, Inc, Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science: The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford University Press, Oxford [England] (2001).

313.
Kaufman, R.R., Segura-Ubiergo, A.: Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973–97. World Politics. 53, 553–587 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0016.

314.
Rudra, N., Haggard, S.: Globalization, Democracy, and Effective Welfare Spending in the Developing World. Comparative Political Studies. 38, 1015–1049 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005279258.

315.
Kenworthy, L., Pontusson, J.: Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries. Perspectives on Politics. 3, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050292.

316.
Korpi, W.: Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. World Politics. 58, 167–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0026.

317.
Busemeyer, M.R.: From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research. 48, 455–482 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00838.x.

318.
Jahn, D.: Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development. International Organization. 60, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060127.

319.
Swank, D.: Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).

320.
Wibbels, E.: Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles, and Social Spending in the Developing World. International Organization. 60, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060139.

321.
Manow, P.: Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review. 7, 101–121 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn022.

322.
Alesina, A., Giugliano, P.: Preferences for Redistribution, http://www.nber.org/papers/w14825.pdf, (2009).

323.
Walter, S.: Crisis Politics in Europe: Why Austerity Is Easier to Implement in Some Countries Than in Others. Comparative Political Studies. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015617967.

324.
Pontusson, J., Raess, D.: How (and Why) Is This Time Different? The Politics of Economic Crisis in Western Europe and the United States. Annual Review of Political Science. 15, 13–33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-100955.

325.
Rodrik, D.: Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy. 106, 997–1032 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/250038.

326.
Adserà, A., Boix, C.: Trade, Democracy, and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness. International Organization. 56, 229–262 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802320005478.

327.
Cameron, D.R.: The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review. 72, 1243–1261 (1978). https://doi.org/10.2307/1954537.

328.
Wibbels, E.: Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles, and Social Spending in the Developing World. International Organization. 60, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060139.

329.
Mosley, L.: Room to Move: International Financial Markets and National Welfare States. International Organization. 54, 737–773 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551352.

330.
Swank, D.: Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).

331.
Mosley, L.: Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).

332.
Armingeon, K.: The Politics of Fiscal Responses to the Crisis of 2008-2009. Governance. 25, 543–565 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01594.x.

333.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

334.
Mosley, L.: Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).

335.
Boix, C.: Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).

336.
Cheibub, J.A.: Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems. American Political Science Review. 100, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540606223X.

337.
Hacker, J.S., Pierson, P.: Abandoning the Middle: The Bush Tax Cuts and the Limits of Democratic Control. Perspectives on Politics. 3, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050048.

338.
Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., Stephens, J.D.: Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies. World Politics. 55, 193–228 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0009.

339.
Hicks, A.M., Swank, D.H.: Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960-82. The American Political Science Review. 86, (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/1964129.

340.
Klitgaard, M.B., Schumacher, G., Soentken, M.: The partisan politics of institutional welfare state reform. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.978355.

341.
Heins, E., de la Porte, C.: The sovereign debt crisis, the EU and welfare state reform. Comparative European Politics. 13, 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.38.

342.
Barnes, L.: The size and shape of government: preferences over redistributive tax policy. Socio-Economic Review. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu007.

343.
Iversen, T., Soskice, D.: Democratic Limits to Redistribution: Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Coalitions in the Knowledge Economy. World Politics. 1–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000039.

344.
Finseraas, H., Vernby, K.: What parties are and what parties do: partisanship and welfare state reform in an era of austerity. Socio-Economic Review. 9, 613–638 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr003.

345.
Rueda, D.: The State of the Welfare State: Unemployment, Labor Market Policy, and Inequality in the Age of Workfare. Comparative Politics. 47, 296–314 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814709275.

346.
van Nispen, F.K.M.: Policy Analysis in Times of Austerity: A Cross-National Comparison of Spending Reviews. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 1–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1005929.

347.
Afonso, A.: Choosing whom to betray: populist right-wing parties, welfare state reforms and the trade-off between office and votes. European Political Science Review. 7, 271–292 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000125.

348.
Kersbergen, K. van, Vis, B.: Comparative Welfare State Politics: Development, Opportunities, and Reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

349.
Jensen, C., Seeberg, H.B.: The power of talk and the welfare state: evidence from 23 countries on an asymmetric opposition-government response mechanism. Socio-Economic Review. 13, 215–233 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu016.

350.
Bohle, D.: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. West European Politics. 1–2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1114296.

351.
Mares, I.: The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. In: Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. pp. 358–375. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).

352.
Raess, D., Pontusson, J.: The politics of fiscal policy during economic downturns, 1981-2010. European Journal of Political Research. 54, 1–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12074.

353.
Hübscher, E.: The politics of fiscal consolidation revisited. Journal of Public Policy. 1–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X15000057.

354.
Plümper, T., Troeger, V.E., Winner, H.: Why is There No Race to the Bottom in Capital Taxation? International Studies Quarterly. 53, 761–786 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00555.x.

355.
Dellepiane-Avellaneda, S., Hardiman, N.: Fiscal politics in time: pathways to fiscal consolidation in Ireland, Greece, Britain, and Spain, 1980–2012. European Political Science Review. 7, 189–219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000186.

356.
Lierse, H., Seelkopf, L.: Room to Manoeuvre? International Financial Markets and the National Tax State. New Political Economy. 21, 145–165 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2014.999761.

357.
Swank, D.: Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).

358.
Allan, J.P., Scruggs, L.: Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science. 48, 496–512 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x.

359.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

360.
Iversen, T.: Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).

361.
Swank, D.: Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).

362.
Armingeon, K., Guthmann, K., Weisstanner, D.: Choosing the path of austerity: how parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics. 1–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1111072.

363.
Manow, P.: Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review. 7, 101–121 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn022.

364.
Korpi, W.: Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. World Politics. 58, 167–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0026.

365.
Blyth, M.: The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change. World Politics. 54, 1–26 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0020.

366.
Ha, E.: Globalization, Veto Players, and Welfare Spending. Comparative Political Studies. 41, 783–813 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006298938.

367.
Swank, D.: Taxing choices: international competition, domestic institutions and the transformation of corporate tax policy. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1053511.

368.
Ostry, J., Berg, A., Tsangarides, C.: Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf.

369.
Fernández-Albertos, J., Manzano, D.: Dualism and support for the welfare state. Comparative European Politics. 14, 349–375 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.32.

370.
Armingeon, K., Guthmann, K., Weisstanner, D.: Choosing the path of austerity: how parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics. 39, 628–647 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1111072.

371.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Downs, G., Smith, A.: A Political Economy of Income Tax Policies. Political Science Research and Methods. 5, 1–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.53.

372.
Menendez, I.: Globalization and Welfare Spending: How Geography and Electoral Institutions Condition Compensation. International Studies Quarterly. 60, 665–676 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw028.

373.
ARNOLD, T., STADELMANN-STEFFEN, I.: How federalism influences welfare spending: Belgium federalism reform through the perspective of the synthetic control method. European Journal of Political Research. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12196.

374.
Baumgartner, F.R., Carammia, M., Epp, D.A., Noble, B., Rey, B., Yildirim, T.M.: Budgetary change in authoritarian and democratic regimes. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1296482.

375.
Franco Chuaire, M., Scartascini, C., Tommasi, M.: State capacity and the quality of policies revisiting the relationship between openness and government size. Economics & Politics. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12090.

376.
Busemeyer, M.R., Garritzmann, J.L.: Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states: evidence from a new comparative survey. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1298658.

377.
Barnes, L.: The size and shape of government: preferences over redistributive tax policy. Socio-Economic Review. 13, 55–78 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu007.

378.
Oser, J., Hooghe, M.: Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor? Support for Social Citizenship Rights in the United States and Europe. Sociological Perspectives. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417697305.

379.
König, P.D., Wenzelburger, G.: Honeymoon in the crisis: A comparative analysis of the strategic timing of austerity policies and their effect on government popularity in three countries. Comparative European Politics. 15, 991–1015 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2016.1.

380.
Osterloh, S., Debus, M.: Partisan politics in corporate taxation. European Journal of Political Economy. 28, 192–207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.11.002.

381.
JENSEN, C.: Issue compensation and right-wing government social spending. European Journal of Political Research. 49, 282–299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01898.x.

382.
Raess, D., Pontusson, J.: The politics of fiscal policy during economic downturns, 1981-2010. European Journal of Political Research. 54, 1–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12074.

383.
Neundorf, A., Soroka, S.: The origins of redistributive policy preferences: political socialisation with and without a welfare state. West European Politics. 1–28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1388666.

384.
Pontusson, J., Weisstanner, D.: Macroeconomic conditions, inequality shocks and the politics of redistribution, 1990–2013. Journal of European Public Policy. 25, 31–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310280.

385.
Scruggs, L., Hayes, T.J.: The Influence of Inequality on Welfare Generosity. Politics & Society. 45, 35–66 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216683165.

386.
Neundorf, A., Soroka, S.: The origins of redistributive policy preferences: political socialisation with and without a welfare state. West European Politics. 41, 400–427 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1388666.

387.
Feierherd, G., Schiumerini, L., Stokes, S.: When Do the Wealthy Support Redistribution? Inequality Aversion in Buenos Aires. British Journal of Political Science. 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000588.

388.
Emmenegger, P., Marx, P.: The Politics of Inequality as Organised Spectacle: Why the Swiss Do Not Want to Tax the Rich. New Political Economy. 1–22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1420641.

389.
Alemán, J., Woods, D.: A Comparative Analysis of Inequality and Redistribution in Democracies. International Studies Quarterly. 62, 171–181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx089.

390.
Abou-Chadi, T., Immergut, E.M.: Recalibrating social protection: Electoral competition and the new partisan politics of the welfare state. European Journal of Political Research. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12308.

391.
Savage, L.: The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: The return of partisan policy making. Governance. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12354.

392.
Bremer, B., McDaniel, S.: The ideational foundations of social democratic austerity in the context of the great recession. Socio-Economic Review. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz001.

393.
Savage, L.: Religion, partisanship and preferences for redistribution. European Journal of Political Research. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12341.

394.
Lockwood, E.: The Global Politics of Central Banking: A View from Political Science, https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/55059/2016_WP5_Lockwood.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

395.
McNamara, K.: Rational Fictions: Central Bank Independence and the Social Logic of Delegation. West European Politics. 25, 47–76 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/713601585.

396.
Fernández-Albertos, J.: The Politics of Central Bank Independence. Annual Review of Political Science. 18, 217–237 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-071112-221121.

397.
Lombardi, D., Moschella, M.: The institutional and cultural foundations of the Federal Reserve’s and ECB’s non-standard policies, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277307695_The_institutional_and_cultural_foundations_of_the_Federal_Reserve%27s_and_ECB%27s_non-standard_policies, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1425/79495.

398.
Bernhard, W., Broz, J.L., Clark, W.R.: The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions. International Organization. 56, 693–723 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760403748.

399.
Scheve, K.: Public Inflation Aversion and the Political Economy of Macroeconomic Policymaking. International Organization. 58, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304581018.

400.
Goodman, J.B.: The Politics of Central Bank Independence. Comparative Politics. 23, (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/422090.

401.
Crowe, C., Meade, E.E.: The Evolution of Central Bank Governance around the World. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 21, 69–90 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.4.69.

402.
Bernhard, W.: A Political Explanation of Variations in Central Bank Independence. The American Political Science Review. 92, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/2585666.

403.
Polillo, S., Guillén, M.F.: Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence1. American Journal of Sociology. 110, 1764–1802 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1086/428685.

404.
Marcussen, M.: Central banks on the move. Journal of European Public Policy. 12, 903–923 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161597.

405.
Cukierman, A.: Monetary policy and institutions before, during, and after the global financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability. 9, 373–384 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.02.002.

406.
Adolph, C.: Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

407.
Hall, P.A., Franzese, R.J.: Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage Bargaining, and European Monetary Union. International Organization. 52, 505–535 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550644.

408.
Clark, W.R., Arel-Bundock, V.: Independent but Not Indifferent: Partisan Bias in Monetary Policy at the Fed. Economics & Politics. 25, 1–26 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12006.

409.
King, M.: Epistemic Communities and the Diffusion of Ideas: Central Bank Reform in the United Kingdom. West European Politics. 28, 94–123 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000297107.

410.
Cukierman, A., Web, S.B., Neyapti, B.: Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review. 6, 353–398 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/6.3.353.

411.
Elgie, R.: The politics of the European Central Bank: principal-agent theory and the democratic deficit. Journal of European Public Policy. 9, 186–200 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110120219.

412.
McNamara, K.R.: The currency of ideas: monetary politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (1999).

413.
Lohmann, S.: Federalism and Central bank Independence: The Politics of German Monetary Policy, 1957–92. World Politics. 50, 401–446 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100012867.

414.
Broz, J.L.: The Origins of Central Banking: Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem. International Organization. 52, 231–268 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898753162811.

415.
Quaglia, L.: An Integrative Approach to the Politics of Central Bank Independence: Lessons from Britain, Germany and Italy. West European Politics. 28, 549–568 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380500085798.

416.
Chang, K.H.: Appointing Central Bankers: The Politics of Monetary Policy in the United States and the European Monetary Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).

417.
The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review. 97, 407–423 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017.S0003055403000777.

418.
Mukherjee, B., Singer, D.A.: Monetary Institutions, Partisanship, and Inflation Targeting. International Organization. 62, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080119.

419.
Broz, J.L.: Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. International Organization. 56, 861–887 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760403801.

420.
Posen, A.: Declarations Are Not Enough: Financial Sector Sources of Central Bank Independence. 253–274 (1995).

421.
Hallerberg, M.: Veto Players and the Choice of Monetary Institutions. International Organization. 56, 775–802 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760403775.

422.
WAY, C.: Central Banks, Partisan Politics, and Macroeconomic Outcomes. Comparative Political Studies. 33, 196–224 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033002002.

423.
Frieden, J.: Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organization. 45, 425–451 (1991).

424.
Frieden, J.A.: Real Sources of European Currency Policy: Sectoral Interests and European Monetary Integration. International Organization. 56, 831–860 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760403793.

425.
Bodea, C.: Independent central banks, regime type, and fiscal performance: the case of post-communist countries. Public Choice. 155, 81–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9843-6.

426.
Jeong, G.-H., Miller, G.J., Sobel, A.C.: Political Compromise and Bureaucratic Structure: The Political Origins of the Federal Reserve System. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 25, 472–498 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn010.

427.
Verdun, A.: The Institutional Design of EMU: A Democratic Deficit? Journal of Public Policy. 18, 107–132 (1998).

428.
Quaglia, L., Taylor & Francis: Central banking governance in the European Union: a comparative analysis. Routledge, London (2008).

429.
Lombardi, D., Moschella, M.: The government bond buying programmes of the European Central Bank: an analysis of their policy settings. Journal of European Public Policy. 1–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1069374.

430.
Arnone, M., Laurens, B.J., Segalotto, J.-F.: Measures of Central Bank Autonomy: Empirical Evidence for OECD, Developing, and Emerging Market Economies, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp06228.pdf.

431.
Davies, H., Davies, H., Green, D.: Banking on the future: the fall and rise of central banking. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010).

432.
Braun, B.: Governing the future: the European Central Bank’s expectation management during the Great Moderation. Economy and Society. 44, 367–391 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1049447.

433.
Broz, L.: The Federal Reserve as global lender of last resort, 2007-2010. (2015).

434.
Bodea, C., Hicks, R.: Price Stability and Central Bank Independence: Discipline, Credibility, and Democratic Institutions. International Organization. 1–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000277.

435.
Schwartz, H.M.: Banking on the FED: QE1-2-3 and the Rebalancing of the Global Economy. New Political Economy. 1–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2015.1041480.

436.
Dobler, M., Gray, S., Murphy, D., Radzewicz-Bak, B.: The Lender of Last Resort Function after the Global Financial Crisis, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/wp1610.pdf.

437.
WAY, C.: Central Banks, Partisan Politics, and Macroeconomic Outcomes. Comparative Political Studies. 33, 196–224 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033002002.

438.
Bodea, C., Higashijima, M.: Central Bank Independence and Fiscal Policy: Can the Central Bank Restrain Deficit Spending? British Journal of Political Science. 1–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000058.

439.
Belke, A., Potrafke, N.: Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance. 31, 1126–1139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.014.

440.
Lepers, E.: The Neutrality Illusion: Biased Economics, Biased Training, and Biased Monetary Policy. Testing the Role of Ideology on FOMC Voting Behaviour. New Political Economy. 1–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1332019.

441.
Goodhart, C., Lastra, R.: Populism and Central Bank Independence. Open Economies Review. 29, 49–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-017-9447-y.

442.
Jacobs, L.R., King, D.: The Fed’s Political Economy. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1–5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000884.

443.
Adolph, C.: The Missing Politics of Central Banks. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000847.

444.
Pontusson, J.: The Fed, Finance, and Inequality in Comparative Perspective. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1–4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000860.

445.
Binder, S., Spindel, M.: Why Study Monetary Politics? PS: Political Science & Politics. 1–5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000835.

446.
Braun, B.: Speaking to the people? Money, trust, and central bank legitimacy in the age of quantitative easing. Review of International Political Economy. 23, 1064–1092 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1252415.

447.
Johnson, J., Arel-Bundock, V., Portniaguine, V.: Adding Rooms onto a House We Love: Central Banking after the Global Financial Crisis. Public Administration. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12567.

448.
de Haan, J., Eijffinger, S.: The politics of central bank independence. (2016).

449.
Alesina, A., Stella, A.: The Politics of Monetary Policy. (2010).

450.
Alesina, A., Stella, A.: The Politics of Monetary Policy. In: Handbook of Monetary Economics: Vols. 3A & 3B, Set. pp. 1001–1054. North Holland [Imprint], San Diego. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53454-5.00006-2.

451.
Belke, A., Potrafke, N.: Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance. 31, 1126–1139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.014.

452.
Crowe, C.: Goal independent central banks: Why politicians decide to delegate. European Journal of Political Economy. 24, 748–762 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.05.002.

453.
Keefer, P., Stasavage, D.: The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review. 97, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000777.

454.
Dumiter, F.C.: Central Bank Independence, Transparency and Accountability Indexes: a Survey. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business. 7, 35–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/tjeb-2014-0002.

455.
Garriga, A.C.: Central Bank Independence in the World: A New Data Set. International Interactions. 42, 849–868 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1188813.

456.
Vaubel, R.: The bureaucratic and partisan behavior of independent central banks: German and international evidence. European Journal of Political Economy. 13, 201–224 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00004-9.

457.
Giesenow, F.M., de Haan, J.: The influence of government ideology on monetary policy: New cross-country evidence based on dynamic heterogeneous panels. Economics & Politics. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12126.

458.
Kaya, A., Golub, S., Kuperberg, M., Lin, F.: The Federal Reserve’s Dual Mandate and the Inflation-Unemployment Tradeoff. Contemporary Economic Policy. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12422.

459.
McPhilemy, S., Moschella, M.: Central Banks under stress Reputation, Accountability and Regulatory Coherence. Public Administration. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12606.

460.
Reisenbichler, A.: The politics of quantitative easing and housing stimulus by the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank, 2008‒2018. West European Politics. 1–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1612160.

461.
Giesenow, F.M., de Haan, J.: The influence of government ideology on monetary policy: New cross-country evidence based on dynamic heterogeneous panels. Economics & Politics. 31, 216–239 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12126.

462.
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., Lodge, M., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).

463.
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., Lodge, M., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).

464.
Webb Yackee, S.: The Politics of Rulemaking in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science. 22, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050817-092302.

465.
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., Lodge, M.: Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).

466.
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., Lodge, M.: Regulatory Strategies (Chapter 7). In: Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. pp. 105–136. Oxford University Press, USA (2011).

467.
Thatcher, M.: Regulation after delegation: independent regulatory agencies in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. 9, 954–972 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046445.

468.
Majone, G.: From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy. 17, (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524.

469.
Vogel, S.K.: Freer markets, more rules: regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (1996).

470.
Vogel, D.: Chapter 1. Understanding Regulatory Reform. In: Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. pp. 9–24. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1995).

471.
Levi-Faur, D.: The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 598, 12–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272371.

472.
Thatcher, M.: Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics. 25, 125–147 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/713601588.

473.
Gilardi, F.: The Same, But Different: Central Banks, Regulatory Agencies, and the Politics of Delegation to Independent Authorities. Comparative European Politics. 5, 303–327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110098.

474.
Carpenter, D., Moss, D.A. eds: Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

475.
Carpenter, D., Moss, D.A. eds: Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

476.
Carrigan, C., Coglianese, C.: The Politics of Regulation: From New Institutionalism to New Governance. Annual Review of Political Science. 14, 107–129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.032408.171344.

477.
Majone, G.: From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy. 17, (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524.

478.
Baldwin, R., Baldwin, R., Cave, M., Lodge, M.: Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).

479.
Gilardi, F.: Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: a comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy. 9, 873–893 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046409.

480.
Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., Thatcher, M.: Beyond varieties of capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).

481.
Gandrud, C.: The diffusion of financial supervisory governance ideas. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 881–916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.727362.

482.
Stigler, G.J.: The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 2, (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160.

483.
Peltzman, S.: Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. The Journal of Law and Economics. 19, 211–240 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1086/466865.

484.
Reed, K.K.: A Look at Firm--Regulator Exchanges: Friendly Enough or Too Friendly? Business & Society. 48, 147–178 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650308316525.

485.
Moran, M.: Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State. British Journal of Political Science. 32, 391–413 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000169.

486.
Gilardi, F.: The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 598, 84–101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204271833.

487.
Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D., i Marin, X.F.: The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies: Channels of Transfer and Stages of Diffusion. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 1343–1369 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407466.

488.
Braithwaite, J., Drahos, P.: Global business regulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).

489.
Levi-Faur, D., Sharon Gilad, Gilad, S.: The Rise of the British Regulatory State: Transcending the Privatization Debate. Comparative Politics. 37, 105–124 (2004).

490.
Moe, T.M.: Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB. The American Political Science Review. 79, (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/1956250.

491.
Dal Bo, E.: Regulatory Capture: A Review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 22, 203–225 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj013.

492.
Becker, G.S.: A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 98, (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/1886017.

493.
Elgie, R., McMenamin, I.: Credible Commitment, Political Uncertainty or Policy Complexity? Explaining Variations in the Independence of Non-majoritarian Institutions in France. British Journal of Political Science. 35, 531–548 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000281.

494.
Guidi, M.: Delegation and varieties of capitalism: Explaining the independence of national competition agencies in the European Union. Comparative European Politics. 12, 343–365 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.6.

495.
Hanretty, C., Koop, C.: Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies. Regulation & Governance. 7, 195–214 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x.

496.
Maggetti, M.: De facto independence after delegation: A fuzzy-set analysis. Regulation & Governance. 1, 271–294 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00023.x.

497.
Carpenter, D.P.: Protection without Capture: Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator. American Political Science Review. 98, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041383.

498.
Baxter, L.: Capture in Financial Regulation: Can We Redirect It Toward the Common Good? Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy. (2011).

499.
Majone, G.: The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics. 17, 77–101 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031.

500.
Thatcher, M.: Regulatory agencies, the state and markets: a Franco-British comparison. Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 1028–1047 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701576510.

501.
McCubbins, M.D., Schwartz, T.: Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science. 28, 165–179 (1984).

502.
Guardiancich, I., Guidi, M.: Formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: A case of institutional complementarity? Regulation & Governance. n/a-n/a (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12080.

503.
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Jordana, J.: The emergence of regulatory regionalism: transnational networks and the diffusion of regulatory agencies within regions. Contemporary Politics. 1–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2015.1010776.

504.
Ennser-Jedenastik, L.: Credibility Versus Control: Agency Independence and Partisan Influence in the Regulatory State. Comparative Political Studies. 48, 823–853 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014558259.

505.
Ennser-Jedenastik, L.: The Politicization of Regulatory Agencies: Between Partisan Influence and Formal Independence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 26, 507–518 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv022.

506.
Guardiancich, I., Guidi, M.: Formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: A case of institutional complementarity? Regulation & Governance. 10, 211–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12080.

507.
Ennser-Jedenastik, L.: Do parties matter in delegation? Partisan preferences and the creation of regulatory agencies in Europe. Regulation & Governance. 10, 193–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12072.

508.
Abbott, K.W., Levi-faur, D., Snidal, D.: Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 670, 14–35 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216688272.

509.
Hanretty, C., Koop, C.: Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies. Regulation & Governance. 7, 195–214 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x.

510.
Pavón Mediano, A.: Agencies’ formal independence and credible commitment in the Latin American regulatory state: A comparative analysis of 8 countries and 13 sectors. Regulation & Governance. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12187.

511.
Eckert, S.: Two spheres of regulation: Balancing social and economic goals. Regulation & Governance. 12, 177–191 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12137.

512.
Malhotra, N., Monin, B., Tomz, M.: Does Private Regulation Preempt Public Regulation? American Political Science Review. 1–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000679.

513.
Smith, M.G., Urpelainen, J.: Windows of opportunity: legislative fragmentation conditions the effect of partisanship on product market deregulation. Journal of Public Policy. 36, 51–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X14000300.

514.
Lodge, M.: Regulation, the Regulatory State and European Politics. West European Politics. 31, 280–301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701835074.

515.
Thatcher, M.: Analysing regulatory reform in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. 9, 859–872 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046391.

516.
Thelen, K.: Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics. 16, 938–953 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001081.

517.
Milner, H.V.: The Political Economy of International Trade. Annual Review of Political Science. 2, 91–114 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.91.

518.
MARGALIT, Y.: Lost in Globalization: International Economic Integration and the Sources of Popular Discontent1. International Studies Quarterly. 56, 484–500 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00747.x.

519.
Berger, S.: Globalization and Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 3, 43–62 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.43.

520.
Brune, N., Garrett, G.: The globalization Rorschac Test: International Economic Integration, Inequality, and the Role of Government. Annual Review of Political Science. 8, 399–423 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085727.

521.
Rodrik, D.: Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy. 106, 997–1032 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/250038.

522.
Rudra, N., Haggard, S.: Globalization, Democracy, and Effective Welfare Spending in the Developing World. Comparative Political Studies. 38, 1015–1049 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005279258.

523.
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., Majlesi, K.: Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure. (2016).

524.
KIM, I.S.: Political Cleavages within Industry: Firm-level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization. American Political Science Review. 111, 1–20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000654.

525.
Rho, S., Tomz, M.: Why Don’t Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest? International Organization. 71, S85–S108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000394.

526.
Baker, A.: Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science. 49, 924–938 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00164.x.

527.
Beaulieu, E., Benarroch, M., Gaisford, J.D.: Intra-industry Trade Liberalization: Why Skilled Workers are More Likely to Support Free Trade. Review of International Economics. 19, 579–594 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2011.00967.x.

528.
Dean, A.: From conflict to coalition: profit-sharing institutions and the political economy of trade. Cambridge University Press, New York (2016).

529.
Walter, S.: Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly. 54, 403–426 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00593.x.

530.
Hwang, W., Lee, H.: Globalization, Factor Mobility, Partisanship, and Compensation Policies. International Studies Quarterly. 58, 92–105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12070.

531.
Owen, E., Johnston, N.P.: Occupation and the Political Economy of Trade: Job Routineness, Offshorability, and Protectionist Sentiment. International Organization. 1–35 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000339.

532.
Borges, F.A.: Debating Trade: The Legislative Politics of Free Trade Agreements in Latin America. Government and Opposition. 1–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2017.28.

533.
Mansfield, E.D., Mutz, D.C.: Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety. International Organization. 63, 425–457 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158.

534.
Rode, M., Sáenz de Viteri, A.: Expressive attitudes to compensation: The case of globalization. European Journal of Political Economy. 54, 42–55 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.05.007.

535.
Mansfield, E.D., Milner, H.V., Pevehouse, J.C.: Vetoing Co-operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science. 37, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000221.

536.
Mutz, D.C., Kim, E.: The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences. International Organization. 71, 827–850 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000327.

537.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

538.
Overbeek, H., Apeldoorn, B. van, Nölke, A.: The transnational politics of corporate governance regulation. Routledge, London (2007).

539.
Davis, G.F., Kim, S.: Financialization of the Economy. Annual Review of Sociology. 41, 203–221 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112402.

540.
Lazonick, W., O’Sullivan, M.: Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society. 29, 13–35 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/030851400360541.

541.
Morgan, G., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).

542.
Hall, P.A., Soskice, D.W.: Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).

543.
Roe, M.J.: Political determinants of corporate governance: political context, corporate impact. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).

544.
Clift, B.: Comparative political economy: states, markets and global capitalism. Macmillan International Higher Education, London (2021).

545.
Callaghan, H.: Insiders, Outsiders, and the Politics of Corporate Governance: How Ownership Structure Shapes Party Positions in Britain, Germany, and France. Comparative Political Studies. 42, 733–762 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008329895.

546.
Hardie, I., Howarth, D., Maxfield, S., Verdun, A.: Banks and the False Dichotomy in the Comparative Political Economy of Finance. World Politics. 65, 691–728 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887113000221.

547.
Cioffi, J.W., Hopner, M.: The Political Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Interests, Preferences, and Center-Left Party Politics in Corporate Governance Reform. Politics & Society. 34, 463–502 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329206293642.

548.
Culpepper, P.D.: Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).

549.
Culpepper, P.D.: Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).

550.
Gourevitch, P.A., Shinn, J., EBL.: Political power and corporate control: the new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005).

551.
Culpepper, P.D.: Institutional Change in Contemporary Capitalism: Coordinated Financial Systems since 1990. World Politics. 57, 173–199 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0016.

552.
Martin Höpner: What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review. 3, 331–358 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/SER/mwi014.

553.
Callaghan, H., Höpner, M.: European Integration and the Clash of Capitalisms: Political Cleavages over Takeover Liberalization. Comparative European Politics. 3, 307–332 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110061.

554.
Beyer, J., Hoppner, M.: The disintegration of organised capitalism: German corporate governance in the 1990s. West European Politics. 26, 179–198 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280738.

555.
Horn, L.: Regulating corporate governance in the EU: Towards a marketization of corporate control. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).

556.
Höpner, M.: Corporate Governance Reform and the German Party Paradox. Comparative Politics. 39, 401–420 (2007).

557.
Cioffi, J.W., Hopner, M.: The Political Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Interests, Preferences, and Center-Left Party Politics in Corporate Governance Reform. Politics & Society. 34, 463–502 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329206293642.

558.
O’Sullivan, M.: The political economy of comparative corporate governance. Review of International Political Economy. 10, 23–72 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229032000048899.

559.
Cioffi, J.W.: The Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 52, (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/4144483.

560.
Allen, F., Gale, D.: Comparing financial systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000).

561.
Roe, M.J.: Political Preconditions to Separating Ownership from Corporate Control. Stanford Law Review. 53, 539–606 (2000).

562.
Alvarez, I.: Financialization, non-financial corporations and income inequality: the case of France. Socio-Economic Review. 13, 449–475 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv007.

563.
Callaghan, H.: Who cares about financialization? Self-reinforcing feedback, issue salience, and increasing acquiescence to market-enabling takeover rules. Socio-Economic Review. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu037.

564.
Hall, P.A., Soskice, D.W.: Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).

565.
Pontusson, J., Rueda, D., Way, C.: Comparative Political Economy of Wage Distribution: The Role of Partisanship and Labour Market Institutions. British Journal of Political Science. 32, 281–308 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340200011X.

566.
Traxler, F., Kittel, B.: The Bargaining System and Performance: A Comparison of 18 OECD Countries. Comparative Political Studies. 33, 1154–1190 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033009003.

567.
Wallerstein, M.: Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science. 43, (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/2991830.

568.
Rueda, D., Pontusson, J.: Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism. World Politics. 52, 350–383 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100016579.

569.
Crouch, C., Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science: Industrial relations and European state traditions. Clarendon, Oxford (1993).

570.
Baccaro, L., Simoni, M.: Organizational Determinants of Wage Moderation. World Politics. 62, 594–635 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887110000201.

571.
Beck, N., Katz, J.N., Alvarez, R.M., Garrett, G., Lange, P.: Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum. The American Political Science Review. 87, (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2938825.

572.
Mares, I.: Wage Bargaining in the Presence of Social Services and Transfers. World Politics. 57, 99–142 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0011.

573.
Martin, C.J., Swank, D.: Does the Organization of Capital Matter? Employers and Active Labor Market Policy at the National and Firm Levels. American Political Science Review. 98, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041371.

574.
Eichengreen, B., Iversen, T.: Institutions and economic performance: evidence from the labour market. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 15, 121–138 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/15.4.121.

575.
Bermeo, N.: Unemployment in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).

576.
Hessami, Z., Baskaran, T.: Has Globalisation Affected Collective Bargaining? An Empirical Test, 1980-2009. The World Economy. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12239.

577.
Emmenegger, P.: The Politics of Job Security Regulations in Western Europe: From Drift to Layering. Politics & Society. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329214555099.

578.
Gordon, J.C.: Protecting the unemployed: varieties of unionism and the evolution of unemployment benefits and active labor market policy in the rich democracies. Socio-Economic Review. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu029.

579.
Knotz, C., Lindvall, J.: Coalitions and Compensation: The Case of Unemployment Benefit Duration. Comparative Political Studies. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014556209.

580.
Darcillon, T.: How does finance affect labor market institutions? An empirical analysis in 16 OECD countries. Socio-Economic Review. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu038.

581.
Jung, J.: A struggle on two fronts: labour resistance to changing layoff policies at large US companies. Socio-Economic Review. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv015.

582.
Roe, M.J., Vatiero, M.: Corporate Governance and Its Political Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2015). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588760.

583.
Mueller, D.C., Oxford Handbooks Online: The Oxford handbook of capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).

584.
van der Zwan, N.: Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review. 12, 99–129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwt020.

Bibliography for IP2031: Comparative Political Economy BETA